User talk:Zanovar
Please sign on talk pages[edit source]
Please sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button () above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date. Signing your comments is important, as it lets other editors know who has posted which comments.
Again, welcome! — AnselaJonla
22:01, January 30, 2013 (UTC)
Zaros[edit source]
Hi, thanks for the url correction ;)
- Only one thing, you deleted the manipulation part, but in the live stream they did say that, if you want to see it, this link brings you right there at the correct minute. Bye! . . . Yours,
Enquidou Talk
. . 12:46, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
- I made a correction again - please listen to the live stream when you attempt to re-edit, thanks ;) . . . Yours,
Enquidou Talk
. . 12:58, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
- More than welcome ;) Can't wait for the expanding lore!! What about you? ;) . . . Yours,
Enquidou Talk
. . 13:16, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
- Me too, it's a difficult subject to discuss about cause we don't know much about Zaros, but I hope their future quest (The World Wake) will change that :). Also looking forward to more lore livestreams. I am particularly interested in all kinds of references to Zaros, I also like the Daemonheim-lore with all the portal-magic stuff and the Rift. What kind of lore do you like? :D
- (I also like Zamorak for a little bit, but pure evil just doesn't amuse me much :P) Zanovar (talk) 13:33, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
- Well, yes, exactly that, but more in general the god lore. Especially about Guthix. I used to be 'a follower', but I was increasingly more disappointed. It (Guthix) seemed to have more like "Status-quo" mentality than a balance/harmony idea. But that's a side step, I love to know more about the relations between the gods, and them with the races, and relations between races. There's so many different angles you could look at, in this game, and that makes it special to me :P That's sort of a unique selling point of RS. People sometimes call RS WoWscape now-a-days because they head more into that side with the combat visuals etc... but the story line, quests, lore, etc... that's so much more dense and deep. I love that :3 I would just like it for them to make the map bigger.. a lot! Not necessarily with newer areas (like the Eastern-lands (what about Northern/Southern lands???) or the Elf city), but rather to make it bigger how you blow up a balloon, for example: Taverly and Burthrope look so messy now. They used to be distinct places. Now it's so much closer together that the stands for the different skills look so silly. Way too cramped. Okay, I'll stop before I keep on rattling :P Have a good day ;) . . . Yours,
Enquidou Talk
. . 15:29, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
- Well, yes, exactly that, but more in general the god lore. Especially about Guthix. I used to be 'a follower', but I was increasingly more disappointed. It (Guthix) seemed to have more like "Status-quo" mentality than a balance/harmony idea. But that's a side step, I love to know more about the relations between the gods, and them with the races, and relations between races. There's so many different angles you could look at, in this game, and that makes it special to me :P That's sort of a unique selling point of RS. People sometimes call RS WoWscape now-a-days because they head more into that side with the combat visuals etc... but the story line, quests, lore, etc... that's so much more dense and deep. I love that :3 I would just like it for them to make the map bigger.. a lot! Not necessarily with newer areas (like the Eastern-lands (what about Northern/Southern lands???) or the Elf city), but rather to make it bigger how you blow up a balloon, for example: Taverly and Burthrope look so messy now. They used to be distinct places. Now it's so much closer together that the stands for the different skills look so silly. Way too cramped. Okay, I'll stop before I keep on rattling :P Have a good day ;) . . . Yours,
- (I also like Zamorak for a little bit, but pure evil just doesn't amuse me much :P) Zanovar (talk) 13:33, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
- More than welcome ;) Can't wait for the expanding lore!! What about you? ;) . . . Yours,
- I made a correction again - please listen to the live stream when you attempt to re-edit, thanks ;) . . . Yours,
Speculation[edit source]
Explain to me why you feel the need to add speculation to pages, even when they have a note telling you not to do such? AnselaJonla
11:35, February 19, 2013 (UTC)