Hello, Mmerlinn, and welcome to the RuneScape Wiki!
Thank you for taking an interest in our wiki. If you have any trouble or need help, feel free to ask questions on my talk page or any other editor's talk page. Also, you could look at a help page or you could shout out on the local forums. We hope you like it here and decide to stay!
Here are a few pages to help out new editors such as yourself:
Please sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button () above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date. Signing your comments is important, as it lets other editors know who has posted which comments.
Again, welcome! —06:26, May 24, 2010 (UTC)
Re:Woad Leaves Redirect[edit source]
It will be exactly like this:
#REDIRECT [[Target Page Name]]
I think I've only come across one instance, if that, in which I had to use underscores. Generally if they are needed, they are automatically inserted. When in doubt, leave them out (Hey, that rhymes ), and if it doesn't work, then add them in. That's about the best I can do. HaloTalk 19:00, May 29, 2010 (UTC)
RE:Hard space[edit source]
You can add the "
" to that end of your sig, right inbetween
<noinclude> and then you wouldn't have to added that manually or in the custom signature field in your preferences (however you put that in). 03:10, June 28, 2010 (UTC)
RE:200m experience points[edit source]
I changed it because the skill box that you added was for user stats. When you do that, a total shows up at the bottom. Naturally, it adds up the numbers that are listed for each skill and shows the total number of players that have 200m experience in a skill. However, given that many players have 200m experience in more than one skill, the total becomes inaccurate. The "not necessarily" was with respect to that. In response to you cleaning up the section, I'd have to disagree. Your version has everything much more spaced out, and I, personally, prefer the table that was used before. I may not be speaking for everyone, but I personally preferred the lay out of the previous version. In any case, I disagree that the section was "a MESS" as you said it was. Suppa chuppa 06:50, July 18, 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry if I made it seem like I was undoing your edits on no basis. I just have one question: I'm not sure what the problem that you saw with the section was. Was it solely with the way in which the information was presented? Suppa chuppa 07:17, July 18, 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deleting[edit source]
Hey, mind marking your speedy deletions as minor edits? It clogs up Recent Changes, and at least if it's a minor edit it can be hidden from the RC. Thanks21:52, December 25, 2010 (UTC)
Userpage redirects[edit source]
Hi there. Unfortunately, we don't allow the creation of redirects in the
User: namespace. You can see RS:REDIRECT#When not to use redirects for details. Because of this, please don't create any more. Thanks! --Aburnett (Talk) 22:17, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what to tell you, we had an extensive discussion on this and as a result disallowed all redirects in the userspace. You could try using the pipe trick, or bring it up on the yew grove if you think the policy needs changing. --Aburnett (Talk) 22:52, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
- Although you are correct, the provision about not using redirects in the userspace was included to make it clear that redirects amongst one's userpages are not allowed. Because of this, the redirects you are using are not allowed. As for the use of the pipe trick, it appears that I was incorrect. Because you are using a template on your userpage, you are going to need to redesign the template to allow you to specify a link separate from the item used in the guide. --Aburnett (Talk) 00:08, February 28, 2011 (UTC)