User talk:Logialian

From the RuneScape Wiki, the wiki for all things RuneScape
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome![edit source]


Hello, Logialian, and welcome to the RuneScape Wiki!

Here are a few pages to help out new editors such as yourself:

If you have any trouble or need help, feel free to ask questions on my talk page or any other any editor's talk page. We hope you like it here and decide to stay!

Again, welcome! Hunter cape (t).png Sentra246Blue hallowe'en mask.png 06:37, March 5, 2011 (UTC)

:File:Saradomin sword equipped (beta).png[edit source]

It's excellent that you applied transparency to this image, but you also reduced its resolution. I assume this was a mistake; could you correct it? --Andorin (Talk) (Contribs) 10:00, September 10, 2012 (UTC)

You're awesome[edit source]

Keep up the good work. ʞooɔ 07:49, May 5, 2013 (UTC)

That's rather...odd. It's especially strange since I know that guy off the wiki. I'll make sure it doesn't happen again, and in the mean time I'm sorry we didn't manage to enforce RS:DEU at the time. Anyway, are you getting the armour stats from a specific source or just looking them up piece by piece? Need any help? ʞooɔ 08:26, May 11, 2013 (UTC)
That's kind of funny, I actually posted something similar to that on Reddit here when the update came out. I'm just a bit uncomfortable with updating the stats based solely on formulas, especially given the rounding and the way that some items don't quite fit the expected values. I like how he has 3 entire posts about hit chance/block chance when it's a really simple formula for determining all of them. ʞooɔ 09:04, May 11, 2013 (UTC)
"Editing the wiki while at the RuneSpan makes both more enjoyable"
That's how I started here :D MolMan 17:28, May 11, 2013 (UTC)
I'm doing that at the moment as well :p Makes getting 125k points less boring (which means siphoning soul esswraiths for nearly 4m more xp, whee~) --Shockstorm (talk) 17:43, May 11, 2013 (UTC)

RE:‎Probably not a big deal but[edit source]

When you notice something like that (especially if it's on your personal page) you should warn the user first. If the user continues his/her vandalism, then take it to an admin or RS:CVU. Usually telling a user you don't want your page edited does the trick. Suppa chuppa Talk 08:25, May 11, 2013 (UTC)

Example setups[edit source]

Hi, thanks for you work on the Tormented Demon strategies page! It seems you uploaded an image of a suggested action bar setup. Per Forum:No more example set up images, such images fall under the criteria for speedy deletion. Instead we have a nifty template, Template:Action bar, you can use to provide examplary setups. Wink User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 12:04, June 24, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! Did you also see the Horrors? They're HORRIFYINGLY HORRIFYING! User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 07:37, June 25, 2013 (UTC)
Aye, that's the usual response, along with "", "what the--" and "*faints*". User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 07:42, June 25, 2013 (UTC)

All armour[edit source]

Hello, you edited my explanation of the "All" armour class, by saying " This armour distributes its defensive ratings throughout the combat triangle" which is incorrect. All armour redistributes the defensive ratings of ALL YOUR GEAR. PomodorosanTalk 18:27, September 8, 2013 (UTC)

I want people to make a clear different between All and Hybrid. It would be nice to explain its utility without referring to how Hybrid armour can be used. Also, it is mentioned that All armour has the same stats as Hybrid, in the tables below. PomodorosanTalk 22:36, September 9, 2013 (UTC)

your edit on Abyssalbane bolts[edit source]

You typed the following "damage to level 75-80 and they gain a flat 30% accuracy bonus ... Nevertheless, abyssalbane's effective damage is surpassed by royal bolts with a royal crossbow." And I was wondering.. since Abyssal demons aren't weak to bolts does this mean that Abyssalbane bolts could still be better (more dmg/acc) than royal bolts, or was that already taken into account? Thanks in advance ;) . . . Yours, This user admires the Void Knights. Who aim to maintain Gielinor's Equilibrium. Enquidou Talk This user likes to do Quests and genuinely loves the story line; lore is his love! . . 19:49, May 7, 2014 (UTC)

Thank you so much for responding :3
I guess I get it now. Since they're weak to Slash (and my highest slash weapon = BGS, lvl 75) then Abyssalbane bolts may be better (especially with my Royal Crossbow) since they will at least be lvl 75 and could well exceed that, and be even more accurate. Since they're weak to Abyssalbane that would mean their Slash weakness is on par with that.. in fact, Abyssal bane may be better if I was using my Saradomin Sword, which is Crush). If I was using Royal bolts they would be hitting harder if Abyssal demons had a weakness to bolts, but they don't (although basically all other demons do) so Bane is better in that regard still (they use melee so ranged is defended well against). Am I correct in this?
Bane (+RCB) > Slash (with T75 weapon), and Bane (weakness) > Royal bolts (stronger ranged defence).

Correct?? because the mod post doesn't really make that (clear with the 75-80 dmg) :-/ . . . Yours, This user admires the Void Knights. Who aim to maintain Gielinor's Equilibrium. Enquidou Talk This user likes to do Quests and genuinely loves the story line; lore is his love! . . 21:08, May 8, 2014 (UTC)

Oh.. and it's even bugged :( Damn... they should really fix it.. . . . Yours, This user admires the Void Knights. Who aim to maintain Gielinor's Equilibrium. Enquidou Talk This user likes to do Quests and genuinely loves the story line; lore is his love! . . 21:09, May 8, 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, I realized I don't even have an Abyssal demon head and know no-one with it... so I can't even test it. Would've been nice to do so with Demonslayer gear. I posted on those pages, thanks ;) . . . Yours, This user admires the Void Knights. Who aim to maintain Gielinor's Equilibrium. Enquidou Talk This user likes to do Quests and genuinely loves the story line; lore is his love! . . 21:29, May 10, 2014 (UTC)
The damage buff from using bane ammunition has been increased. xD Yaaaay! Let's hope it's somewhat useful now! . . . Yours, This user admires the Void Knights. Who aim to maintain Gielinor's Equilibrium. Enquidou Talk This user likes to do Quests and genuinely loves the story line; lore is his love! . . 10:45, May 19, 2014 (UTC)




THIS MESSAGE! MolMan 17:13, December 6, 2014 (UTC)

Nope. It's offset by 1. MolMan 14:17, December 7, 2014 (UTC)

Multi target spells[edit source]

You added "hitting any other players or monsters in this space" to the Burst spell pages. Although I never really use(d) the ancient spells, I remember hearing (years and years ago) that they were updated to only hit up to 9 (or some other amount) of players in the given area, instead of 'all' of them. Something about players piling up in a 3x3 area in Fight Pits, and then gaining tons of magic experience per cast. Is there still any sort of restriction on the number of targets (within the area) it hits? IP83.101.44.209 (talk) 05:50, February 7, 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. I am curious about the result; finally prove/bust something I heard years ago and haven't seen anything about on wikia. (And yes, I've been too lazy to try and figure it out myself, on account of never using them anyhow.) IP83.101.44.209 (talk) 06:01, February 7, 2015 (UTC)
The rewording/not hinting at either a cap nor unlimited sounds good. I'm not 100% sure monsters can't stand on the same square (there is a case where if a player runs through a monster, so long as that monster doesn't move, other monsters can move to that same square, I believe; but regardless that is unhelpful in testing). The only suggestion I can think of to test it, would be to shortly hijack a wikia clan Fight Pits/Castle Wars/Soul Wars event to test it. IP83.101.44.209 (talk) 07:21, February 7, 2015 (UTC)

Pay-to-play Runecrafting training[edit source]


I noticed that you’ve been editing this page and updating its contents, I just wanted to let you know that I’ve completely rewritten the guide to (I hope) bring it fully up to date and add some experience rates to it. If you see anything in the guide that could be improved more or think there’s other information that would be useful to mention then please feel free to continue to edit the guide, the improvements that you’ve made so far have been really helpful!


Magic logs detail.pngIsobelJTalk page 15:23, August 29, 2015 (UTC)

Monsterfoboxes[edit source]

Wonderful work! I'm really happy you're working on this. For your question about XP values, I would generally trust the script more than the article, but there are indeed cases (particularly with some Slayer monsters) where the script generates the wrong experience value. I've spent a lot of time trying to figure out why this happens, but I don't understand the game mechanic (I don't know if anybody does). I usually go test monsters that are way off, like those jadinkos were. ʞooɔ 09:48, November 9, 2015 (UTC)

Images[edit source]

Nice work with the NXT retakes, keep it up :) Magic logs detail.pngIsobelJTalk page 09:07, August 15, 2016 (UTC)

the Wikian title[edit source]

Hello! Following the discussion at RuneScape:The Wikian, you have been granted the Wikian title! Please make arrangements with Gaz Lloyd to receive the title in game. If you could please add your in-game name to RuneScape:The Wikian/Users, it would be most appreciated. Thanks and congratulations! svco4bY.png3Gf5N2F.png 01:18, December 14, 2016 (UTC)