User talk:Liquidhelium/Archive 11

From the RuneScape Wiki, the wiki for all things RuneScape
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive
This page or section is an archive.
Please do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to the current talk page or contact an administrator for aid if no talk page exists.
Saradomin (The Battle of Lumbridge).png
Archives

This bot currently does nothing.[edit source]

It's workin rite nao! --Aburnett(Talk) 03:12, September 4, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Internet explorer[edit source]

Internet Explorer barely supports CSS3, web developers have to make workarounds to make things on their website work for it. It killed NetScape... Though I have to say, Internet Explorer has been making many fixes and is becoming better. In any case, just use Firefox :). Mark (talk) 21:33, September 4, 2010 (UTC)

Believe me, you'll be better off with Chrome, Firefox or Safare. Though Microsoft provides me my OS and Xbox Live. Mark (talk) 21:41, September 4, 2010 (UTC)

Bob's asses[edit source]

u broke it --Iiii I I I 22:49, September 4, 2010 (UTC)

What, you don't like my redesigned main page? --Iiii I I I 00:59, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
[1] --Iiii I I I 11:04, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
It's only because of this move, and I'm done now. :D --Iiii I I I 21:52, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

Re: What?!?!?!?![edit source]

I hate your reasoning and I replaced it.Me sorry. I was looking at recent changes, went to diff and edited. I think when I clicked to edit you hadn't saved yet and I replaced it. Concerned Sorreh. ʞooɔ 02:33, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

I think it was my fault, but whatever. Anyway, I liked Sentra's edit summary ʞooɔ 02:35, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, I've noticed that. Beginning to think the proposal was a bad idea. I think I'll go nominate a couple images. ʞooɔ 01:30, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
What shall I say? Yes? ʞooɔ 01:57, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
Lrn2joke Lol ʞooɔ 01:58, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
Yes suh. ʞooɔ 02:01, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

#ifeq[edit source]

Ifeq is hard stuff, it takes someone with an iq of at least 12 to learn it. Are you sure you are ready? XXKBucket detail.pngrwojy 02:56, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

Rs:AR section[edit source]

You don't think it should be left there for users to comment on if they are against it? - [Pharos] 13:04, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

Category Names[edit source]

See User talk:Iiii I I I#Sara Category before you delete categories again. Magic-icon.pngStelercusIlluminated Book of Balance.png 16:00, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

The problem we were having was that users didn't know there was another category for users only. If we have the correct category suggested when they go to add the mainspace category, the problem would likely be avoided. Magic-icon.pngStelercusIlluminated Book of Balance.png 16:04, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
Some users (example) just add the category mark directly. I'm not totally happy with the name, but I don't see any other alternatives that would solve the problem. Magic-icon.pngStelercusIlluminated Book of Balance.png 16:07, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
It would require more code on userbox template, and some of the names would still have to follow my naming convention (for example, Bobian Users would not sound right). I can still do that, if you want. Magic-icon.pngStelercusIlluminated Book of Balance.png 16:10, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
The fact that both you and Iiii had issue with the format implies that many others will as well. Extra code will not be a problem. Magic-icon.pngStelercusIlluminated Book of Balance.png 16:14, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
I wish I knew. Anyway, I'm going to go with the extra code option. Magic-icon.pngStelercusIlluminated Book of Balance.png 16:19, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
I'm about to go to church. I changed the names of the categories in the template, but it will take a while (no clue how long) for them to change on all the userpages. They will appear as redlinks, but they will be in the category none the less. Under the assumption that they will be fixed when I get back, I will delete the old categories (unless somebody else does it first). Magic-icon.pngStelercusIlluminated Book of Balance.png 16:42, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Question[edit source]

... Another person asking that again? Seriously? >.> SardominSign Me! 19:28, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

Yes. This has happened before >.> SardominSign Me! 19:30, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
Oops Misread that ^^" But Yes. We are different people SardominSign Me! 19:31, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
Its fine. You are just making sure. SardominSign Me! 19:33, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Excuse me, Mr. Chia[edit source]

Yes (in recent times: 1 2 3). I don't vote in RfAs/RfBs if I feel as if I don't know the candidate, don't care, feel as if my vote won't contribute to the discussion or outcome, or have nothing to actually say. Dragon medium helm! Whaddaya know?Chiafriend12Better than rune!Loon is best buttlord 20:35, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

2007, I would assume. The process was a lot simpler [and less standardized] back then. Dragon medium helm! Whaddaya know?Chiafriend12Better than rune!Loon is best buttlord 08:20, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

Imposter![edit source]

The bioshock disease is spreading. kitty.pngPsycho Robot talkSilver bar.png 00:02, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

The basis for my signature, and twigy's and someone elses I can't remember whose. Its a vidya game! kitty.pngPsycho Robot talkSilver bar.png 01:38, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
Do you mean mine, Psycho? OMG! [2] N7 Elite (Ready to talk now?) 01:40, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
Yea you! Soon everyone shall be recruited into our ranks. Even liquidhelm! Mua ha ha ha ha ha! kitty.pngPsycho Robot talkSilver bar.png 01:41, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

Re:DAP[edit source]

Simple, 1.Common practice at the time and 2. that wasn't put through consensus at the time (don't know if it's ever been) 4. There is no number 3.--

Helm of neitiznot (charged).png Azaz129 Crystal shield.png Talk Edits Contribs

02:09, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

Oops, I lied, there is a number 3, that thing was also written a mere 5 days before my RfA. Fin.-- 02:21, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
It was also three weeks long and the closest thing to wiki hell I can imagine. I was also a fairly divisive figure before in my earlier admin days.-- 02:30, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
I'm afraid you'll have to ask Psycho about that.-- 02:38, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
Looks good, though perhaps, one minor addition, you see I've been curious to anything that users would like to say in general. For instance a "general comments" page in which users can leave anything else they'd like to say that doesn't fit into the other categories, basically an 'other' page, as I seem to get the feeling some users (especially the newer ones) are unfortunately hesitant to talk to 'crats or give full opinions to the individuals themselves. Just a thought of course.-- 02:56, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
Full steam ahead.-- 21:17, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Deleted contribs[edit source]

Is that really high? I wouldn't think so... --Coolnesse 03:18, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

O_o Now it makes me feel like I want deleted contribs with my others too... --Coolnesse 13:24, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

Re: DAP[edit source]

It's fine with me. I'm a bit busy with classes, but I should be around. Quest map icon.png Laser Dragon Task map icon.png 03:58, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

RAGE[edit source]

FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU- --Iiii I I I 16:27, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

Why? --Iiii I I I 17:35, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

Re:RFD[edit source]

Firstly do not call for deletion, but merging. Your arguments should be the same, but at the end you say Merge to Lucien instead of Delete. Also I would cite RuneScape:Requests for deletion/Dragon ore, since it was deleted under similar pretenses. kitty.pngPsycho Robot talkSilver bar.png 17:35, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Wait, what?[edit source]

It varies with mah mood. My RS name hasn't been ZamorakO_o for a few months, and I've seen some better logic in other Gods. svco4bY.png3Gf5N2F.png 17:40, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

Saradomin just seems to be to much of a "good" person, or in other words, a goody tew shoes, to be for real. svco4bY.png3Gf5N2F.png 17:43, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

Re:User:Lil Diriz 77[edit source]

Thanks for notifying me, but I had not even known of that thread until now. If the closing implementations of that thread haven't been added to a policy yet, it should be done now. Then again, I've read the policies once, and I don't plan on reading them often to check for such updates. Meh.

I'll go remove the redirect now. Sorry for the trouble. Quest point cape.pngLil Diriz 77 Talk Summoning-icon.png 21:18, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

^ I realize now that what I just said above could be used against me in the future Lol Let me word it better. I do care about policies and what they contain, but I can't be blamed when I am not notified that a policy is changed/added. I am a normal human being, and checking RS:POLICIES often is not part of my regular schedule. Maybe in the future it would be a good idea to notify users in the SiteNotice when a policy is changed/added? This way, people would make less mistakes and admins would spend less time telling people they broke a policy. Quest point cape.pngLil Diriz 77 Talk Summoning-icon.png 21:30, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Forum Header[edit source]

If I changed it, then all instances of the header using the current method would have to be changed, and all the admins would have to learn a new way of doing things yet again. However, I made it the way it is for the sake of flexibility. Simple parameters (see the UOL lesson on templates) should be reserved for parameters that must exist at all times, otherwise the template can potentially become more complex. It also makes it easier to add onto the template later if we are not using excessive simple parameters. Sorry. Magic-icon.pngStelercusIlluminated Book of Balance.png 21:26, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

I noticed you undid the edit by a bot changing the forumheader template. Use common sense. Even though the proposal only stated that future discussions need to be archived via the method in the proposal, that does not mean that all discussions before the date the proposal was implemented must not use the new method. I understand why you have some issues with the method of stickying things within the template, though there was clear consensus that the new method of archiving the discussions is superior (if not in every single way, to the extent that I can't see why anyone would disagree). If somebody changes the way the thread was archived to the new way while fixing a few other things on the page, they are not doing any damage to anything. I'm not sure why you are so concerned about it. Magic-icon.pngStelercusIlluminated Book of Balance.png 23:18, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
Sorry for sounding so aggressive in the above comment. Anyway, you forgot to do the archive thing right (and I say "right" because it was determined it must be that way via consensus) in the thread you recently closed. Magic-icon.pngStelercusIlluminated Book of Balance.png 23:09, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
Even if it was not the result of forgetfulness (and I was trying to assume you were not intentionally disregarding consensus), it still needs to be done the way the community requires it. What's wrong with it, anyway? Magic-icon.pngStelercusIlluminated Book of Balance.png 23:19, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
Yes. As an admin, you are expected to follow consensus. Magic-icon.pngStelercusIlluminated Book of Balance.png 23:24, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
I thought you would call me out on the admin part. I considered saying "You, especially as an admin, are expected to follow consensus". First of all, RS:BB dies where consensus begins. You can't use it to get around anything determined by consensus. As for RS:UCS, I can't see how refusing to follow consensus because you refuse to change a habit is common sense. Please change the way you archived the discussion. Magic-icon.pngStelercusIlluminated Book of Balance.png 23:30, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
Look at why the proposal was passed. First, it stops the "this thread has not been edited in x number of days..." warning from appearing once the discussion is archived. That alone makes the change not useless. Second, it made the archive template internal, which can make for cleaner changes later if we need to make them. At the time, it also stopped needless extra space from appearing, though this was later fixed. Anyway, you must archive discussions the way that was proposed and approved via consensus. There is no policy to get you around this. Magic-icon.pngStelercusIlluminated Book of Balance.png 23:36, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
I'm not arguing this anymore, because you're being irrational (I'm sorry I had to say that). There was consensus to make the change, and you must follow that consensus. If you have a problem with it, go back to the Yew Grove and try to change it. Until that time, you must follow consensus. Magic-icon.pngStelercusIlluminated Book of Balance.png 23:43, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

I also suggest you look at this exchange between Azaz and Bonzii. It's quite a bit like the current situation.

Magic-icon.pngStelercusIlluminated Book of Balance.png 00:24, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Zip-e-do-da, zip-e-de-day 00:30, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Yep, I am pretty much done. However, don't get mad at me for saying this was annoying. If you wanted it to stop, you could have accepted all this earlier (and I honestly believe you believed what you just signed this whole time). Magic-icon.pngStelercusIlluminated Book of Balance.png 00:32, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Signing area[edit source]

Don't be sad, I was gonna have the page deleted as it bores me now and has gone unedited for 2 month, if you want to can delete it now. Full Slayer Helmet! Evil1888 Talk A's L Dragon Platebody! 21:37, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

Defining bureaucrats project[edit source]

So let me get this straight... A 'crat did defining admins and an admin is now defining 'crats... what's next? Helpers defining rollback and IPs defining staff??? Full Slayer Helmet! Evil1888 Talk A's L Dragon Platebody! 21:54, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

Defining b'cats[edit source]

Well I'm not really sure what moderating it will involve. Though I would think I would still like to. Perhaps you could tell me what it involves? Matt (t) 22:05, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

Me? Knowledge of b'cats? Hmm...sorry, I don't think I'm your guy. Matt (t) 22:14, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

Thumbs Up.gif[edit source]

--Aburnett(Talk) 00:26, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

FatNooblet's UserPage[edit source]

Pssst! You only undid one of the IP's edits, there was 2. svco4bY.png3Gf5N2F.png 00:27, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

A DAB of UOTMustard[edit source]

Honestly I can't think of anything to say about crats that isn't also applicable to admins. I don't think the additional tools that crats adds any additional expectations. If something comes to me, I'll let you know and see if it can work for something. Also I shall have to decline the UOTM nomination. Not for any reason to do with you, I just don't really approve of the whole UOTM project, and would rather not be involved with it. kitty.pngPsycho Robot talkSilver bar.png 01:27, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

I don't think the expectations of bureaucrats as they pertain to AEAE and neutrality are any different than those for a sysop. In my mind, the only difference between a bureaucrat and a sysop is the extra tools that a bureaucrat gets. And in this wiki, the crat doesn't get to use those extra tools at a whim. The main thing is user rights, and they can't do that unless someone passes an RFA or signs the rollback thing. Revisiondelete is only used in cases of personal information and pornographic content, which is cut and dry. There's no real judgment call to be done there. So I don't see anything that can be said about a crat that wasn't said about an admin in the sysop definition project. kitty.pngPsycho Robot talkSilver bar.png 23:06, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
I disagree with that. If a crat's opinion is taken more seriously than an admin's it is because they do not post that much. That is not an aspect of being a crat, that is a problem with our current set of crats. And I also disagree that an admin can say strong oppose/support but a crat cannot. That, to me, seems a stark violation of AEAE. kitty.pngPsycho Robot talkSilver bar.png 23:11, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

RE:[edit source]

Strange..it replaced a break tag with the wikimarkup for bold..I have absolutely know idea why that happened OMG! Andrew talk 01:52, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Konami code[edit source]

Yes, it could definitely be changed to only work or not work on certain namespaces. --Quarenon  Talk 03:17, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Looking back[edit source]

Yeah...that has changed a little. HaloTalk 04:35, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

konami code[edit source]

I have just reread the original thread and I see there was NO consensus to implement it. While many of the opposers had certain objections that were shown to be not a concern (a concern for damage to the wiki), that alone should not have allowed the code to be implemented. It would be proper for you to simply disable it on this basis.--Degenret01 05:01, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

wtf[edit source]

Why did you delete my page?  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dr Murd0ck (talk) on 10:01, September 7, 2010 (UTC).

Gee, helpful[edit source]

"I deteled it because players don't deserve articles. --LiquidheliumTalk 10:05, September 7, 2010 (UTC)", first off, L2spell; second, you mentioned the same policy I did >.<. Full Slayer Helmet! Evil1888 Talk A's L Dragon Platebody! 10:09, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

Uhh[edit source]

Hey, I just wanted to know if your pissed at me.   Swizz Talk   Events!   15:45, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

Re:DAP[edit source]

Well, the entire point of the previous DAP was to make sure the community had its say, while I'm sure I could write up something, I have the impression that it would go against the aim of encouraging discourse by as many wikians as possible. Also, don't be surprised if you have to hunt people down to moderate the sections, including those you may disagree with, that's the only way I managed to get the first one off the ground.--

Helm of neitiznot (charged).png Azaz129 Crystal shield.png Talk Edits Contribs

20:33, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Konami code[edit source]

I honestly don't really care either way. I still think that there was rough consensus was favor of implementing it, but I wont be offended if you overturn it. --Aburnett(Talk) 22:33, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

Consensus is not based on the number of supports and opposes but on the weight of arguments. Opposing something because its pointless is totally stupid. If its pointless then they just don't make use of it. There is no negative consequence to the konami code, only positive. kitty.pngPsycho Robot talkSilver bar.png 23:08, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
I added my 2c to the discussion. You'll have to excuse the re-hashing of my closing statement, I'm drained from school -.- --Aburnett(Talk) 23:10, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
As I said. Exhaustion Angry --Aburnett(Talk) 23:12, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
btw are you new here? Lol --Aburnett(Talk) 23:24, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

For some people that just need to see it in a new light.


143 Glitch[edit source]

I swear. It happened. Please undelete it! I SWEAR it HAPPENED! Agreon 01:30, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Alright, thanks. I feel better having at least a section.

:No reason.   Swizz Talk   Events!   06:55, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

RfD's[edit source]

Sorry I was busy with other stuff and forgot about it. I think the two Iestin articles are viable for a merge, but not a full deletion. If someone reads the book and sees the name Iestin, they might come and search it. They should be taken somewhere, even if that page does nothing but say he is never seen in the game. Something you could do is merge it with the book in which they are mentioned, but I think its better to just merge them together. You may think that this is parallel to the likes of Underwater City and Lucien's daughter, but I don't think it is. underwater city was never mentioned by name anywhere, Guthix was just vaguely discussing city that was underwater. Likewise, Lucien's daughter is never mentioned or talked about, just brought up in an insult. However Iestin was explicity menitoned by name in a book. There is informationa bout him even if there is not much. I think the case is very strong that the two Iestins are the same person which is why I believe they should be merged instead of deleted. As for the gravy boat article, I still don't think a deletion is in order, but rather a redirect to the thanksgiving event. If someone seraches that term, they shoudl be taken somewhere, or they'll just recreate the article. kitty.pngPsycho Robot talkSilver bar.png 22:13, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Jolly good, sir. kitty.pngPsycho Robot talkSilver bar.png 23:53, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

You, 'normal'?[edit source]

I'm sure no one was suggesting that. Lol Full Slayer Helmet! Evil1888 Talk A's L Dragon Platebody! 00:33, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

I certainly wasn't. kitty.pngPsycho Robot talkSilver bar.png 00:38, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
Am I normal? D: --Iiii I I I 00:48, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Hilite[edit source]

yesh mashter --Iiii I I I 14:46, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

Change what logo? --Iiii I I I 20:46, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
I feel like an administrator again with my green hilite. OMG! --Iiii I I I 00:09, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
Would the Yew Grove be the place to discuss changes to MediaWiki:Recentchangestext? --Iiii I I I 00:16, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
my first yg lolol --Iiii I I I 00:25, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
Forum:Plural vs. Singular Player references in articles is earlier --Iiii I I I 00:40, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
ur such a nib --Iiii I I I 01:28, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
tl;dr --Iiii I I I 01:55, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
[email protected]?!? --Iiii I I I 01:58, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
Two spelling mistakes. BLASPHEMY! --Iiii I I I 02:01, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
Fine. -.- --Iiii I I I 02:13, September 11, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Mass rollback script[edit source]

Hi, I fixed a bug in the site's AJAX refresh script that may have prevented the mass rollback script from working properly. The link should be working now; it should appear underneath the avatar on a user's Special:Contributions page. Let me know if you can see it after refreshing your browser cache. --Quarenon  Talk 00:05, September 10, 2010 (UTC)

Defining IP Addresses[edit source]

With the current trend of defining groups of people Wink , I would like to try and define IP Addresses. I already have a list of topics set up, here. You might want to have a look and suggest improvements. I will draw up the page like the DAP and your project later. I think it would be best if I wait until we work out what Bureaucrats are. Cheers, 222 talk 07:48, September 10, 2010 (UTC)

So what would you prefer? Running it alongside? Or waiting 'til DBP is over? There are benefits for both methods, running it alongside might give both parties extra input, but it might also cause conflictions, which would make waiting until one is over better. 222 talk 09:33, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
IP's are too anonymous. I will be going ahead on this, but I still need an answer to the time, alongside DBP or after? 222 talk 01:30, September 12, 2010 (UTC)
I really think this would be more your personal preference more than any timeline issues. I just want to know whether you'd rather have this happen after you finish DBP or while it's running. I'll talk to Azaz about the other stuff. 222 talk 02:16, September 12, 2010 (UTC)
Thank you. I'l decide when I'm ready. 222 talk 02:18, September 12, 2010 (UTC)

DBP[edit source]

I'll do Perception and AEAE (again) if you want. I have a bit of free time that I could write something up sometime this weekend or so. HaloTalk 15:56, September 10, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Nonconformist Sysops[edit source]

As much as I like consistency, I'm not interested in forcing people to do what I want (and I'm not saying this is what you're doing). As for disliking the color (yes, I spelled it the American way, just for you Lol) green, what's not to like? I wear it in game all the time and it's the color (ugh, spelling) of my bedroom in real life. Surprisingly, I only own one green T-shirt, and I hate it. Magic-icon.pngStelercusIlluminated Book of Balance.png 21:58, September 10, 2010 (UTC)

colour colour colour colour colour colour colour colour colour colour colour colour colour colour colour colour colour colour colour colour colour colour colour colour colour colour colour colour colour colour colour colour colour colour colour colour btw im nawt a stalkr kthxbai ajr 14:46, September 11, 2010 (UTC)

Or I can bless your talk page with more green! That's about as good as cake, imo. Magic-icon.pngStelercusIlluminated Book of Balance.png 02:36, September 12, 2010 (UTC)

WORT WORT WORT[edit source]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96kQZHkcTn8 --Iiii I I I 18:54, September 11, 2010 (UTC)

Blarg? --Iiii I I I 18:58, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
wut was dis for nub --Iiii I I I 00:40, September 12, 2010 (UTC)

You nub[edit source]

Signatures must link to the user's userpage. The name does not need to be the user's exact account name, but it must be a name by which the user is widely known. Without this provision, signatures do not provide the useful ability to search on a page for a comment from a certain user.
RS:SIG

Full Slayer Helmet! Evil1888 Talk A's L Dragon Platebody! 02:56, September 12, 2010 (UTC)

Hey, you don't know him as green? eCopM0F.png Full Slayer Helmet! Evil1888 Talk A's L Dragon Platebody! 03:01, September 12, 2010 (UTC)
I'm known as #22CC00 now, boy. kitty.pngPsycho Robot talkSilver bar.png 03:05, September 12, 2010 (UTC)
What about rabbitz' sig violated RS:Sig? I don't see how it did. kitty.pngPsycho Robot talkSilver bar.png 03:46, September 12, 2010 (UTC)
It still links to his page. I think in this case, UCS is applicable. kitty.pngPsycho Robot talkSilver bar.png 03:49, September 12, 2010 (UTC)
The sig says nothing about ctrl+F. It says searchable; meaning that if you were to look down the page you would know my posts. ajr 03:52, September 12, 2010 (UTC)
With all the insane sigs that are out there, you really think his is unacceptable? What about wojoj's or 7i's? Gf searching for "i" in a forum thread. kitty.pngPsycho Robot talkSilver bar.png 03:55, September 12, 2010 (UTC)
So is "jrad" kitty.pngPsycho Robot talkSilver bar.png 03:58, September 12, 2010 (UTC)
The source of the page tells all! Full Slayer Helmet! Evil1888 Talk A's L Dragon Platebody! 04:03, September 12, 2010 (UTC)
But if "jrabbitz" is his sig, then he will be known as "jrabbitz" and people will ctrl+f that. Regardless, support for ctr+fing isn't part of the sig policy, and shouldn't be enforced, especially if it means stopping someone from doing what they want with their sig. If you think it should, you could create a yew grove thread for it, however I really think its a minor issue that isn't worth the weight you're attributing to it. If searching ajr won't work, I think people will just go to jrad without any issues. kitty.pngPsycho Robot talkSilver bar.png 04:06, September 12, 2010 (UTC)
It is policy, see RS:PRIAR kitty.pngPsycho Robot talkSilver bar.png 04:12, September 12, 2010 (UTC)

Dungeoneering article[edit source]

Excellent piece of writing, summarizes every single reason of why dungeoneering is not a skill that I've thought of and several points they I haven't. Atheist723 05:13, September 12, 2010 (UTC)

Re:11,000th edit[edit source]

1,000 edits in two weeks. :O --Iiii I I I 20:01, September 12, 2010 (UTC)

Re:UTP[edit source]

Well, it doesn't forbid it, however, I strongly urge you to use strict discretion. As we really don't need controversy over some vitriolic rhetoric anyone's put up. Also this.--

Helm of neitiznot (charged).png Azaz129 Crystal shield.png Talk Edits Contribs

23:59, September 12, 2010 (UTC)

This[edit source]

I think that it would make sense to only use the red portion of this RGB value, which is equal to a mere 34. Now whatever the hell that was makes even less sense. ShinyUnown T | C | E 02:01, September 13, 2010 (UTC)

If you thought degen was mad before, you haven't seen anything yet. Associating him, even by metaphor, with the election of GWB is serious flamebait. If I understand your metaphor correctly, you are comparing him to Jeb Bush, right? He will take extreme offense to that, given his passionate hatred of GWB and Jeb Bush's large role in getting him elected. And I realise you're probably not intending it to be offensive, but I guarantee you that he will find it so. I realise you're tryign to make a point, and I don't want to censor you, in the interest of peace, i request that you censor yourself >_> kitty.pngPsycho Robot talkSilver bar.png 22:14, September 13, 2010 (UTC)
Huzzah! I always liked the name jeb. But I'll have to get a cowboy hat, skinny jeans, and a leather vest to fit the part completely. Yee haw. kitty.pngPsycho Robot talkSilver bar.png 23:17, September 13, 2010 (UTC)
I'm an optical scanning device used to miscount votes all over the nation and Jeb Bush to miscount votes just in Florida! kitty.pngPsycho Robot talkSilver bar.png 23:23, September 13, 2010 (UTC)
I know. Just pressing your buttons. Mua ha ha ha ha. kitty.pngPsycho Robot talkSilver bar.png 23:30, September 13, 2010 (UTC)

User:Liquidhelium/Fahrenheit 22CC00[edit source]

Look, there's 3i+1. He's often in my dreams.

WTH? O_o --Iiii I I I 22:51, September 13, 2010 (UTC)

o --Iiii I I I 23:36, September 13, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Templates toolbar script[edit source]

Thanks, I'll look into that. svco4bY.png3Gf5N2F.png 02:55, September 14, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Deletion request[edit source]

Wow, that's a blast from the past. Thanks for letting me know. --Aburnett(Talk) 21:55, September 14, 2010 (UTC)