User talk:Isobel

From the RuneScape Wiki, the wiki for all things RuneScape
Jump to navigation Jump to search
May 2013 - May 2014
May 2014 - May 2015
May 2015 - May 2016
May 2016 - May 2017
May 2017 - May 2018
May 2018 - May 2019
May 2019 - May 2020
May 2020 - May 2021

Re: Wikian Title Nomination[edit source]

Hey Isobel, thank you for the nomination! I would love to be nominated for the Wikian Title :D Ashdale lodestone icon.png Woolnutt Ashdale lodestone icon.png 10:56, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Wikian Nomination[edit source]

Isobel, I would be humbled to be nominated. Thank you for considering me for the title. Blade (talk) 04:38, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

RE: Wikian Title[edit source]

Thanks for the consideration I would love to be nominated for the Wikian title!Lucky coin.pngDr SuperSetCoins 10000.png 20:07, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Wikian Nomination[edit source]

Hello! I would be honored! So yes please :) Regendruppel (talk) 13:00, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

RE: Wikian Title[edit source]

Hey Isobel! Wow, while that wasn't my goal when I got more involved in the Wiki, yes I would be honored to be nominated RAf (talk) 03:28, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Wikian Nomination[edit source]

Yeah sure, I would like to be nominated for the title ^^ Bncym (talk) 20:53, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Waydar[edit source]

IsobelJ: Can you tel me what was wrong with the info I added to Waydar and how the information can be properly added to this entry? And congradulations on your nomination! 01:33, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

I now see what you did and appreciate it very much! 02:19, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Re:Brimhaven[edit source]

Sure. Fswe1 (talk) 15:50, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

All right, yeah, the leader bit should be rephrased. As for the street; didn't know it'd been removed, but I guess the name is still canon, then, unless it's been explicitly contradicted somewhere (which I doubt). Well spotted. Fswe1 (talk) 11:58, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Re:Lightomatic[edit source]

Are you going through all of my contribs? :P It's from the lighthouse manual, which is linked on the page. I'm not sure what I could add as a source other than quoting pretty much the entire text, though. Fswe1 (talk) 11:17, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Looks like my edits, but not my IP address, since I was using someone else's ipad to add those bits whilst on holiday. One thing I've learnt: don't edit using anything that isn't a PC...
As for the longer message you'd left earlier (and I'd missed), I would like to politely request that you step off your pedestal. I am perfectly well aware of the policy on speculation and so on, and I disagree that the demonikin and lightomatic articles were in violation thereof. Could they have been worded better? Absolutely. ('Quick edits' aren't my thing anymore, it seems...) Did I interpret Scarface Pete's leader role perhaps too liberally? Yeah, probably. But please grant me the dignity of not having to go through a fairly tenuous warning-esque message about speculation. Just tell/ask me in a more friendly manner or use the talk page, or something.
Similarly, I know how citing works and any failure to do so stems entirely from laziness on my part. By all means, do poke me to remind me to add references, but not in this almost haughty manner. The edits I recall your asking me about are the Aspidistra plant (yep, needed a source, well spotted), for example, and the zogre one. You reverted both edits for lack of source. First of all, you could've asked me. Second of all, you could've added {{fact}} or used the respective talk apge. Third of all, the zogre one in particular said "according to Juna;" is it really so much of a bother to quickly check Juna's dialogue page that you opted to just nix the entire addition instead? Again, I concede my laziness in not adding the references (there might be more examples...), but your reaction seems to be more focussed on telling me off than on getting the information right on the respective pages.
As for OSW copying: I messed up a part of Haunted Mine, not having checked the paragraphs to copy carefully enough apparently, and fixed it after Salix alerted me. To my knowledge, that's the only significant oops I made in this respect. No need for that belligerent tone. The only effect that has on me (who is semi-active on the wiki at best, if that) is to conclude, 'Well, sod 'em,' and stop editing altogether.
Summing up: I'm far from perfect and gladly have any and all mistakes etc. pointed out to me, but I'm not a complete degenerate so please don't treat me as though I were one, all right? Now, as far as I'm concerned, water under the bridge, no offence taken, and so on and so forth. I hope this settles it, then. Smile You needn't reply if you don't want to, either. Fswe1 (talk) 07:57, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

OSF[edit source]

Hello, I would like to be added to the reward section. Yes I know bad me for not seeing a message from April LOL. I'm also open to adding more edits if they're needed for rewards or just in things i come across ingame. My rs3 user is the same as my name here

Vembessel (talk) 14:26, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

RE: Wikian Title[edit source]

Hey Isobel, thanks for consideration, I would be honored to be nominated :) Mato77 (talk) 13:37, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Lumbridge chathead[edit source]

Hey there. I saw you reverted my edit of the Lumbridge Guard chathead, but I can't figure out why? All I did was remove the box, nothing else. Ppizzo278 (talk) 20:24, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

RE: Wikian Title[edit source]

Hey, yes I would like to be nominated, thank you for your consideration! :) DoomMetal (talk) 14:19, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Re: Wikian Title Nomination[edit source]

Feel free to nominate again. Much appreciated Dux bell0rum (talk) 12:11, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Deleted images[edit source]

How do we judge necessity of images such as the one deleted here: That was a valid in-game interface image, and at least I have received great use of such images. For instance, often there are patch notes stating that such interface has received some graphical update, and these images can be used to easily check what the interface used to look like. Sure, the average user looking how to use these items probably won't find these images very necessary, but outright deleting them isn't the correct way in my opinion. Do we have some guidelines on the matter? The general granularity guideline would suggest that deleting information is wrong, even if you personally don't find that information particularly useful. Thingummywut (talk) 17:07, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

The Wikian Title Nomination[edit source]

I would love to have the title, But only if you think I have done enough! =^.^= MikeEmmett (talk) 08:39, 13 January 2022 (UTC)