User talk:Extreme133

From the RuneScape Wiki, the wiki for all things RuneScape
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome![edit source]


Hello, Extreme133, and welcome to the RuneScape Wiki!

Thank you for your past contributions and taking an interest in our wiki. If you have any trouble or need help, feel free to ask questions on my talk page or any other editor's talk page. Also, you could look at a help page or you could shout out on the local forums. We hope you like it here and decide to stay!

Here are a few pages to help out new editors such as yourself:

Please sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button (Signature button.png) above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date. Signing your comments is important, as it lets other editors know who has posted which comments.

Again, welcome! Adult chameleon (automatic).png Anurin Talk · Sign! . 00:09, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Life Points update[edit source]

Hello, I'm not sure if you are aware of this, but the hitpoints stat has been updated and called life points, and you now have 10 times as many life points as you had hit points. Also, food now heals ten times as much. Thanks for your contributions, and happy editing! Ajraddatz Talk 19:16, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

Dry Dock behavior might not be a glitch[edit source]

You wrote "my ship got damaged and needs 2 hours of repair only for it to work like nothing happened" in your notes on a change to the port page. Could it be that you didn't check the voyage until 2 hours after it completed (e.g. if you launched the voyage before going to sleep)? When you return to the game after the voyage completes, it seems to take 0-2 minutes for the game to register that the voyage is complete, then you may get the message that dry dock time is required, but you're basically given credit for the time since the voyage would have completed. So if you check the voyage status 2 hours late,  you won't have to wait the 2 hours in dry dock.

I've had this happen to me several times. If this explanation is right it's a reasonable behavior, and the glitch is not that you don't have to spend time in dry dock, it's that the message ought to have read "your ship needed to spend time in dry dock..." not "your ship needs time in dry dock"

Haystacks (talk) 23:52, January 19, 2013 (UTC)

I think there's no need to print an image, just try to note whether a lot of time has passed since the voyage was initially supposed to be finished. If you check your voyage around the expected finishing time and you're able to use your ship even though you were told it had to go to drydock, that would definitely be a glitch...Haystacks (talk) 03:07, January 20, 2013 (UTC)

I'm still curious about this glitch. Was it:
  • (a) You launched a mission lasting e.g. 1:44, you came back after ~2 hours & checked results, the game reported that you needed to spend 2 hours in drydock, but you were able to launch that ship immediately.
  • (b) You launched a mission lasting e.g. 1:44,  you came back after ~4+ hours & checked results, the game reported that you needed to spend 2 hours in drydock, but you were able to launch that ship immediately.
Could you post the answer on my talk page? It really makes a difference in how the glitch should be described in the page. Haystacks (talk) 22:26, January 20, 2013 (UTC)

Super September[edit source]

Please remember to capitalise the first letter of the task explanation cell as well. Small recharge gem.png AnselaJonla Slayer-icon.png 00:03, September 5, 2013 (UTC)

Super September[edit source]

If your haste to update the page removes your ability to spell, either slow down or don't edit it! Small recharge gem.png AnselaJonla Slayer-icon.png 00:12, September 19, 2013 (UTC)

Page creation[edit source]

  1. Make sure the page name is spelled right.
  2. Please use the blank template located at the bottom of Template:Infobox Item (or whichever infobox is more appropriate, assuming it has a blank).
    1. If there is no blank version, strip out the guide texts (the <!-- --> and any text in between).
  3. Please add the appropriate navboxes and templates, even if it is only {{stub}}.
  4. Don't use {{PAGENAME}}. Use {{subst:PAGENAME}} instead, so the pagename is put onto the article instead of remaining as a template.
  5. The first sentence should read something like "The article name is an item won from the Squeal of Fortune." Remember to bold the name.

Thanks for making those pages though. Small recharge gem.png AnselaJonla Slayer-icon.png 00:15, October 4, 2013 (UTC)

Wisdom aura cooldown[edit source]

The old wisdom aura page has an additional explanation between brackets: "you will not be able to activate Wisdom again 24 hours after activating this aura, only 24 hours and 30 minutes afterwards". If I activate an aura at time X, and I can activate it again at time X + 24.5 hours, given that the aura remains active for 30 minutes, then the cooldown period is 24 hours, not 24.5 hours. E.g. Jack of trades (prior to the hidden update) is active for 30 minutes, and has a cooldown of 23.5 hours, allowing you to activate it again exactly 24 hours after you last activated it. So, is the cooldown really 24.5 hours (allowing you to reactivate Wisdom 25 hours after your last activation) and was that additional explanation wrong, or are you counting the activation time as part of the cooldown time? IP83.101.44.209 (talk) 08:27, December 16, 2013 (UTC)

Yes, that was indeed a rather poor explanation... as it doesn't answer my question. I never contested that it was changed to recharging at midnight UTC; I was asking whether you were confident about a cooldown period of 24.5 hours + an activation time of 30 minutes (25h total before you can activate it again), as opposed to a cooldown of 24 hours + activation time of 30 minutes (24.5h total before it can be activated again). The time an aura is active is not part of the "cooldown" time. IP83.101.44.209 (talk) 09:48, December 16, 2013 (UTC)
If the answer you just posted on my talk page is the one you are confident about, then a 24 hour cooldown is the correct answer. There are 24 hours and 30 minutes between 1pm one day and 1:30pm the next day. 30 minutes of this time is the activation time. The other 24 hours are the cooldown time of the aura. The activation time is not part of the cooldown time. The activation time (the full time, not the time the aura has been actually active) plus cooldown time equals the total amount of time between aura activations. IP83.101.44.209 (talk) 15:55, December 16, 2013 (UTC)

Hi[edit source]

The images you uploaded were merged to File:Trade Referee.png and File:Trade Referee chathead.png. Please remember next time to upload the images over existing ones instead of creating new files :). HaidroH rune.pngEagle feather 3.pngCandle (blood red).png 1XqyDNM.png Crystal triskelion fragment 3.pngHazelmere's signet ring.png 07:56, January 11, 2014 (UTC)

Re:Greenfingers[edit source]

If they have their own pages, they shouldn't do. Small recharge gem.png AnselaJonla Slayer-icon.png 18:09, January 27, 2014 (UTC)

Do not change Legendary back. If you do so after receiving this message, then you will be edit-warring. Small recharge gem.png AnselaJonla Slayer-icon.png 18:32, January 27, 2014 (UTC)

New items[edit source]

Can you avoid making pages with nothing more than a blank infobox? It's not anymore helpful than the page not existing. At least fill in some parameters or write a brief sentence please... MolMan 16:52, February 23, 2015 (UTC)

Categories[edit source]

There's no need to add those categories. I'm going to be creating a navbox, which will add it automatically. MolMan 15:35, March 23, 2015 (UTC)

{{PAGENAME}}[edit source]

When you use this on new pages, please include subst: (so you'd be adding {{subst:PAGENAME}}. It's not good to leave the variable in there by itself. MolMan 22:31, March 23, 2015 (UTC)

RE[edit source]

You either need to make an indication that you're going to be using the edit session, do all your work at once, add everything that should be there, or suck it up and not complain when things are edited. MolMan 23:52, March 23, 2015 (UTC)

Deletion template[edit source]

For future reference, it's {{d|reason}} for speedy deletion, or {{rfd|reason}} for pages that need a more formal process. --Iiii I I I 18:36, March 24, 2015 (UTC)

Disassembly XP[edit source] is this right? ʞooɔ 06:45, January 27, 2016 (UTC)

I'm not sure if you're aware, but you can check the XP to the decimal precision: 6mx8wnH.png

Works for 0.1-0.9 xp as well. Go to interface settings and toggle "Make X progress window" --Jlun2 (talk) 15:41, January 27, 2016 (UTC)

compqty[edit source]

I'm not sure if you're aware of your copy paste, but not every item gives 1 component. :P --Jlun2 (talk) 14:28, January 27, 2016 (UTC)

Do you have a list or some memory of those you don't know? --Jlun2 (talk) 14:36, January 27, 2016 (UTC)

Re: research fail[edit source]

no it's not? --Iiii I I I 02:23, April 1, 2016 (UTC)

Holy shit, you're right --Iiii I I I 02:37, April 1, 2016 (UTC)

It's just a joke. So getting the wrong Shandong doesn't matter... On the other hand, Shandong Hongda is entirely about this same, wrong Shandong. Oops... Do you know off the top of your head any good sources? I'll need to find time this month to make an article on the correct subject. MolMan 13:30, April 1, 2016 (UTC)

Transcripts[edit source]

Hey, I'm going to let you finish first, but in the future, please transcribe any texts from game (e.g. from books) in the transcript namespace. In this case, Transcript:The Covenant of Perpetual Conflict. If you want the transcript to appear on the article about the item, you should use:

{{Transcript|The Covenant of Perpetual Conflict}}

Thanks. MolMan 14:18, April 25, 2016 (UTC)

Ya but dw, that's the only real change. All formatting rules are still the same. MolMan 14:24, April 25, 2016 (UTC)
Check the edits I just made. I'll go back to the module some time later and give a more helpful message than that script error. MolMan 14:42, April 25, 2016 (UTC)

Invention training[edit source]

Why did you put in an invisible list version of something that was already in the prose? Small recharge gem.png AnselaJonla Slayer-icon.png 16:36, June 12, 2016 (UTC)

the Wikian title[edit source]

Hello! Following the discussion at RuneScape:The Wikian, you have been granted the Wikian title! Please make arrangements with Gaz Lloyd to receive the title in game. If you could please add your in-game name to RuneScape:The Wikian/Users, it would be most appreciated. Thanks and congratulations! svco4bY.png3Gf5N2F.png 01:17, December 14, 2016 (UTC)

Hey! Just checking back through RuneScape:the Wikian/Users, and you don't appear to have claimed your title yet. Please contact me in-game (accounts Gaz Lloyd or Gaz L) or via RS:DISCORD to arrange a meetup so I can grant it :) Quest.png Gaz Lloyd 7:^]Events!99s 22:23, February 18, 2017 (UTC)

Wikia forking thread[edit source]

Hey Extreme133! I wanted to give you a heads up that there's a thread (Forum:Leaving Wikia) up for discussion right now about moving this wiki (and OSRS wiki) away from Wikia, to a self-hosted, Jagex-supported site. We'd love your input on the proposal (and the new wikis). Thanks! Magic logs detail.pngIsobelJTalk page 21:09, September 30, 2018 (UTC)