User talk:Ciphrius Kane
This is my talk page, and it be mine.
Re: Archives header[edit source]
Richards farming shop 12 October 2018[edit source]
I have no idea where I'm writing but I hope you see this. I don't see any way to send you a PM in this wiki. Anyway thanks for merging the maps but the old version still shows up on the page. Murskmursk (talk) 19:31, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
In response to your response under the topic of Isobel's nomination[edit source]
'tis indeed most splendiferous. I accept th' nomination.
Me main concern stems mainly from th' breaks I've taken since 2010 'n hence been lackluster in me editin' in comparison t' other individuals.
I be, however, glad that th' criterion has been clarified thusly.
Question: Am I allowed t' decide which account in RuneScape th' title goes t', should th' nomination be successful?
- Hi! Thanks for removing the stub template. I searched and searched for any more info to be added, and nothing came up. Thank you in advance! Firecracker (talk) 17:02, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Re: Speculation[edit source]
Thank you for removing the edits to the cottaintail knight and carrot lance pages as I did see they were confirmed to be from treasure hunter and planned to check back on that when I could and fix it if needed. However, I wanted to mention it was probably greater speculation to assume the items would be from treasure hunter in the first place as there was no mention of such a treasure hunter promotion on the official newspost or any other official source. As such, it was much less rooted in speculation to assume the items would be the "some special Easter armour" mentioned in the BTS post than from treasure hunter without any official indication that such an event was coming to treasure hunter- my edit had an official source, the original page creation for the claim did not and I can't fathom how such a conclusion was come to without acknowledging it was pure speculation. Could've just fixed it with out the unneccessary snark there in the comment, and maybe talked to the original page's creator about unnecessary speculation instead (at a stretch).
Berserker redirect info[edit source]
Hey there, you removed my edit on the berserker page with the note "see discord". However, I DO NOT use discord. So could you please explain me why you chose to remove it? Bloody111 (talk) 12:25, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
You reverted my edit [], because of this definition: "A stub is an article which does not cover all information available about the topic."
However, the same policy (RS:STUB) also has the definition "Stubs are RuneScape Wiki articles that have insufficient information. Stubs are generally one paragraph or less which give little or no information." The policy lists a few guidelines for what is not a stub. Those guidelines include a filled out infobox, more than one image, information about location and information about any related quest or activity.
The article Eva (Breaking the Storm) has a filled out infobox, 2 images, gives information about her location and about her involvement in the Breaking the Storm event. The page contains not every available information about her (just like 99% of all articles on this wiki do not contain every information about their topic), however, the article does not have "insufficient information" (actual stub for comparison: Jellyfish (player-owned port))
I don't know why RS:STUB contains the sentence "A stub is an article which does not cover all information available about the topic.", but if we take that sentence literally, we can add the template to absolutely every article on the wiki.
18:55, 24 June 2019 (UTC)