Thank you![edit source]
If you do so, you will be allowed to have a userpage and a signature, and you can become a part of the community. You will also have the ability to move pages and upload pictures, and be able to edit some protected pages after being here for four or more days.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask on my talk page or any other editor's talk page or the User help page. You could also look at a help page, talk to us on IRC, or join our local [[Special:Chat|Chat room]].
Please do not be such an active contributor without having an account. While it is not actually required for you to have an account, it would be nice. Also, having an account is awesomesauce. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. MolMan 21:59, March 19, 2013 (UTC)
RE: reverting my edit for "vandalism"[edit source]
This was not vandalism. May I suggest that you abide to RS:AGF next time, because I have 119 dungeoneering and had it since August 2012 and I know from those years of dungeoneering in many occult and warped floors that Seekers earned their name for "Trollgazer" by being a false positive of a Soulgazer. Regards, – Ozank Cx 12:30, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
- I don't appreciate your slander of my above response on Coelacanth's talk page. Unless you have blatant proof that I am a troll, please don't make such accusations again. – Ozank Cx 20:35, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
I will tell you now that under the policy for talk page deletion, that post is not viable to be removed. Please don't remove it again.
While 'trollgazer' is dumb, it is a legitimate nickname, though I don't think putting it in the infobox is the best of ideas. You can continue to edit as you please, but if the editing about the single word ont he seeker's page continues, I will protect the page from editing. Coelacanth0794 Talk 20:26, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
- Please do not do that again. It is not eligible to be removed under RS:DDD, which is listed above 14:18, November 21, 2013 (UTC)