If you ask me, i still think TzTok-Jad is better,TzTok-Jad hit a 57 on me once when i ran outa prayer, spirt beast only hit 3-7 on me with NO PRAYER AT ALL!Yefpatterson 18:52, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
I removed the following claim from the article: The Spirit Beast appears to be an undead or a "Revenant" version of TzTok-Jad, and is stronger than the normal monster as all Revenants are.
There is no reason to believe so exept that it has four legs and three toes.Stormpride 21:19, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Quest Monster[edit source]
After all, this is just a quest monster. The quest would be Master+ is it'd involve killing something better than TzTok-Jad. Remember though, Monster Examine says that the Spirit Beast has higher max hit. =D
The image is waaaay to big...
Succession box[edit source]
Does this belong here? It isn't an attackable monster, so should it be classified as such? If we do choose to keep it, Lord Hazeel should be placed between the King Black Dragon and the Kalphite Queen because he is level 296. Dtm142 00:36, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- I agree that it is more an npc than a monster..yew grove anyone? Atlandy 15:47, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Monster Examine[edit source]
Could someone use Monster examine spell on it? I already completed that quest and i can't get back. --BeyPokéDig 13:28, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Killing it[edit source]
This is the strongest monster in RuneScape, it's not two different entities.[edit source]
Why is this considered the second strongest monster in RuneScape? This is the strongest monster in RuneScape, it's the same creature as the Corporeal Beast and it's messing up the rankings by taking up two spots. Since the CB is the "true form" of the creature, the Spirit Beast should only be a subsection of the Corporeal Beast, and not be considered a separate entity. The position of all of the other powerful monsters should not have to be brushed under the carpet because of this anomaly. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 18.104.22.168 (talk).
- Make sure to sign comments, even if you don't sign in. Thanks. 17:32, November 21, 2009 (UTC)