Talk:Rune armour set (lg)
Untitled[edit source]
Is it possible to create a tablet that shows the price diffrence between the individual pieces and the whole set? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.204.121.249 (talk).
- Added a section at the bottom showing the price of the pieces vs the price of the whole set. It uses the GEP template, so it should stay up to date without needing editing.
AnselaJonla
12:01, October 10, 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the help![edit source]
Thanks to all people that have helped me improve the "Set cost vs crafting from rune bars" chapter, it looks awesome now!
Sebbes333 (talk) 23:01, November 9, 2013 (UTC)
Make a template?[edit source]
Is it possible to make a template of this? for other armour sets and possibly other items too? and how?
--Sebbes333 (talk) 23:10, November 9, 2013 (UTC)
Item | ![]() |
![]() |
GE Price of item | Profit/loss | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Rune full helm | 2 | 6,532 | 4,651 | -1,881 |
![]() |
Rune platebody | 5 | 16,330 | 21,675 | 5,345 |
![]() |
Rune platelegs | 3 | 9,798 | 18,469 | 8,671 |
![]() |
Rune kiteshield | 3 | 9,798 | 18,608 | 8,810 |
Totals | 13 | 42,458 | Individual items: 63,403 Armour set: 62,169 |
Individual items: 20,945 Item set: 19,711 |
Sorting problem[edit source]
In the list of 'costs vs bars' I changed from this {|class="wikitable"...
to this {|class="wikitable sortable"...
to make it possible to sort the list of items, the problem is that it sorts it wrong, for example if I sort for the amount of bars required I get this
result: 2,3,5,3
the correct result would obviously be: 2,3,3,5
I don't know what to do?
--Sebbes333 (talk) 23:59, November 9, 2013 (UTC)
- It is simply a limitation of the sorting feature; it works fine with plain text, but things like GE prices via templates don't sort properly. 83.101.44.209 05:25, November 10, 2013 (UTC)