Talk:Raksha, the Shadow Colossus

From the RuneScape Wiki, the wiki for all things RuneScape
Jump to: navigation, search
This talk page is for discussing the Raksha, the Shadow Colossus page.

Suggestion: Move to Raksha[edit source]

I propose moving this page to Raksha (or creating a redirect to this page) and moving the page currently there (which describes a lore page item) to something like [[Raksha (item)]]. I expect that a lot more people are and will be coming here to read details on the creature rather than the lore item, especially once it is released as new boss (which seems all but certain now). Soana (talk) 21:17, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

I agree. The only question is what to rename the book article to. Is there precedent for this sort of thing? NeutralinoTalk?This is a pale wisp. 21:34, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
It looks like a lot of Archaeology-related pages that have the same title as another page have the suffix (Archaeology), e.g. Red candle (Archaeology). This suggests that Raksha (Archaeology) might be a good name for the article on the item. Soana (talk) 22:14, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Good find. I'll move the pages now.NeutralinoTalk?This is a pale wisp. 22:31, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Oh dear. I can't move this page to "Raksha" because that page still exists as a redirect to Raksha (Archaeology). Not sure what to do now...NeutralinoTalk?This is a pale wisp. 22:38, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
You could delete Raksha, THEN move this page.Jampolo 23:36, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
I considered doing that, but I don't know how to delete pages as I've never done so before.NeutralinoTalk?This is a pale wisp. 02:24, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Monolith[edit source]

Where did this come from? Was it mentioned in a stream?Jampolo 00:39, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Yeah, you can see it here. On release I'm sure they'll be easier ways to cite it but I guess this video link works for now. ɳex undique 01:12, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Correct affinity?[edit source]

Looking at the monster examine for Raksha shows the melee/range/magic affinity to be 55/55/65 which is different from the wiki currently showing 55/65/55. How was the affinity determined and should it be updated, or is there something wrong with the monster examine spell? (I used monster examine without any prayers/potions/effects/armor/weapons active or equipped, so my examine shouldn't have been influenced by anything) Vindictam (talk) 17:41, 23 January 2021 (UTC)