Talk:Obsidian pure

From the RuneScape Wiki, the wiki for all things RuneScape
Jump to: navigation, search
This talk page is for discussing the Obsidian pure page.

Untitled[edit source]

Please don't just VFD this. I created it because I think it is strange that there is an article about Dagger Alley and The Dens but not about this. Ancient talisman.png Oil4 Talk 18:35, November 17, 2009 (UTC)

We already have a big ol' Pure page that you could add this info to... ASATO MA SAD GAMAYA 18:37, November 17, 2009 (UTC)
I agree with Sir Revan ‎20px‎AtlandyBeer.png 18:44, November 17, 2009 (UTC)

It is just ridicilous thats there different pages for the most ridicilous items and persons and not ever seperate pages for all kinds of pures.

I mean, different pages for diamond ring, ring of life, ashes, Varrock Palace Secret Guard but not for obby maulers, range/mage hybrids or claw rushers??? Void pure 19:19, November 17, 2009 (UTC)

This is an encyclopedia style website. There should be a page for every item (granularity). The type of pure can be put on the Combat pure page, because that it what it is‎20px‎AtlandyBeer.png 19:22, November 17, 2009 (UTC)
That's because all those items are real items in the game. They have quantitative facts about them, like alchemy value, shop price, xp values, etc. Pures are much more qualitative. There's no real "facts", just what is usually done. kitty.pngPsycho Robot talkSilver bar.png 19:23, November 17, 2009 (UTC)
I think that this should be kept, just like Sailing. Sailing isn't real either. Ancient talisman.png Oil4 Talk 19:24, November 17, 2009 (UTC)
Of course theres alot to say about obby pures, including real facts. Void pure 19:47, November 17, 2009 (UTC)
I think sailing should go too btw ‎20px‎AtlandyBeer.png 19:25, November 17, 2009 (UTC)
Sailing isn't real, and I do think it should go, but in defence of those who support its inclusion, it does have a series of Jagex moderator quotes, which would fall under the realm of quantitative data. I realize there are lots of little tiny articles, their existence does not preclude the possibility that this doesn't deserve its own article. kitty.pngPsycho Robot talkSilver bar.png 19:29, November 17, 2009 (UTC)

Hmm. Vfd it then. I'm neutral. I've seen some good arguments. Ancient talisman.png Oil4 Talk 19:33, November 17, 2009 (UTC)

Should be merged into combat pures.‎20px‎AtlandyBeer.png 19:34, November 17, 2009 (UTC)

Yes, lets just merge it with an article that is waaaaaaaaaaay too long already. I want to write more wikis about different pures but if you want all in the same page, OKAY BUT DO NOT WHINE IF THAT PAGE IS GONNA BE OVER 200 PAGES LONG. Void pure 19:39, November 17, 2009 (UTC)

This can not be explained in a paragraph? ‎20px‎AtlandyBeer.png 19:42, November 17, 2009 (UTC)
Indeed, theres way to much to say about them to put it in just one paragraph.Void pure 19:54, November 17, 2009 (UTC)
How can a page be over 200 pages long? Ancient talisman.png Oil4 Talk 20:00, November 17, 2009 (UTC)
Try to copy the content of a page to a word document and you will find out.Void pure 20:07, November 17, 2009 (UTC)