Talk:Hazelmere's signet ring

From the RuneScape Wiki, the wiki for all things RuneScape
Jump to: navigation, search
This talk page is for discussing the Hazelmere's signet ring page.

Confirm tier?[edit source]

Can anyone confirm what tier luck this gives? I'd assume 4 given the difficulty of obtaining it, but logic doesn't always apply...Plus, the luck page doesn't mention it. I'd assume someone's gotten it already, given the GE price has gone up? --Jimwormmaster (talk) 08:32, May 8, 2017 (UTC)

It's pretty difficulty to confirm something about thing, that no one haven't even obtained yet. Also, G.e's price going up doesn't mean, that the ring has been obtained. Mattila22 (talk) 08:51, May 8, 2017 (UTC)
No one has obtained it yet, that's not necessary for the GE price to update. The luck level has also not been confirmed, but it's rumoured to be T5.Qtto (talk) 09:24, May 8, 2017 (UTC)
Don't delete someone else's comments. Farming-icon.png Salix of Prifddinas (Talk) Prifddinas lodestone icon.png 09:27, May 8, 2017 (UTC)
Ah, I thought in order for the GE price to update, someone had to actually buy/sell it, but then again, the guide price never really made that much sense to me. --Jimwormmaster (talk) 19:34, May 9, 2017 (UTC)

Source for Hazelmere's Ownership[edit source],422,8,65917024 Must be logged in as a VIP member, as it is in the VIP forums. "Mod Timbo - Spill the beans on everything hazelmeres lost signet. Starting from when the idea popped in your head to where we are currently.

Mod Timbo: I've always enjoyed the idea of getting a hold of some of the items from famous NPCs that either work with, work against or are from our history. Hazelmere is one of those people and I loved the idea that he had a ring that had some mystical properties over luck that he ended up losing one day and turns up in the world. As for where we are currently, we're continuously monitoring the data surrounding the ring and making changes based on data to get to where we want the ring to be entering the game. None have still dropped, as of writing, but we will continue to monitor and make changes until we're happy with the drop rate." Elf of Seren (talk) 16:48, August 20, 2017 (UTC)

We've been over this before What I've done Ciphrius Kane Talk 17:32, August 20, 2017 (UTC)
Many members on Reddit disagree with your opinion, and believe that it should be included.

Follow this thread if you want. Elf of Seren (talk) 17:34, August 20, 2017 (UTC)

I've added in that Timbo liked the idea, but "I liked the idea that he owned the ring" does not mean "he definitely did own the ring" What I've done Ciphrius Kane Talk 17:47, August 20, 2017 (UTC)
The phrasing that Timbo uses is a little confusing and open to interpretation. My interpretation of it is that the idea for the ring stems from Hazelmere owning the ring and then losing it one day. From an outside POV, that's how it sounds to me. Rather than edit warring over this it might perhaps be a better idea to ask Timbo a straight question about if it is indeed canon that Hazelmere owned the ring, or just asking for clarification of what he said in the forum post. People are going to have differing interpretations of this and rather than dispute it we should seek validation jayden 17:59, August 20, 2017 (UTC)
Funnily enough, I was thinking the same thing. I'm signing up for twitter now What I've done Ciphrius Kane Talk 18:00, August 20, 2017 (UTC)
I tweeted him in June after the first revision with no answer. I welcome someone get a straight answer from him, because it's dumb arguing over semantics.Elf of Seren (talk) 18:02, August 20, 2017 (UTC)

LOTD Relic[edit source]

How does HSR behave if someone has the LOTD relic power enabled? Does the double drop effect still trigger? WiggleCat (talk) 14:24, 15 April 2020 (UTC)