RuneScape talk:Wiki History
We should also put when we accomplished certain mile markers, like 500 articlesAtlandy 17:41, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
This page might be able to help. Tes Fan
22:37, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Joining[edit source]
Writing the dates when people joined is useless. Its not necessary. And its certainly going to make the page load slower if EVERYONE writes it. I think they should be removed. ChristineTalk 19:48, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
- I think people's joining dates are important, but only admins and crats, not normal editors.
This dude is evil
like hellArnie 20:04, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
- I say anyone who either gets sysopped, or has 1,000 edits should have their day of joining be added. If we list everyone's day of joining, that'd another, maybe, 200 lines to add. =/
Chiafriend12
I have 12 friends. 20:49, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
- I say anyone who either gets sysopped, or has 1,000 edits should have their day of joining be added. If we list everyone's day of joining, that'd another, maybe, 200 lines to add. =/
Can I be featured? (I already put myself up there). Cashman286 talk 20:24, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Content[edit source]
There is going to be stuff other than a copy of the user rights log and first edit dates on this page, right? Skill 22:24, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
- As I've said two times on the IRC, "Yes, there's going to be more".
Chiafriend12
I have 12 friends. 01:13, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
- If there's going to be more, then I would think it makes more sense to focus on the parts that can't be found elsewhere already. Skill 01:39, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Deleting[edit source]
Ok, even though I am retired, I just had to comment on this. Why in the world do we need this?! This is completely useless! All of the content is about "important" users that joined and milestones of articles. After all my months of editing, this is the first time I have ever seen this article! This article is never updated, not useful, and is a waste to this wiki. I propose that we delete this article or we have a group of people do a major (and I mean MAJOR) update to this article. --User:Spencemac724 23:58, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
- I think that this is kind of cool; I never knew it existed until now too lol.--Richardtalk 02:33, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- It is a little neat, however it needs a major rework/update and in its current state seems a bit incompatible with the professionalism of the wiki today.-- 02:36, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Again Azaz beat me to what i was going to typo, maybe we should make him a 'crat. Regardless, this article hits me as another great opportunity for Skill's idea of a CotW... ~
kytti khat 15:42, 9 January 2009 (UTC)- Same as Richard, lol 15:45, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Again Azaz beat me to what i was going to typo, maybe we should make him a 'crat. Regardless, this article hits me as another great opportunity for Skill's idea of a CotW... ~
- It is a little neat, however it needs a major rework/update and in its current state seems a bit incompatible with the professionalism of the wiki today.-- 02:36, 30 November 2008 (UTC)