RuneScape talk:Requests for adminship/Cool Spy0
Tarikochi and Earthere, stop what is obviously a revert war and discuss it. O.o JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot 19:19, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- He should not separate the "votes" and the discussion, as RSWiki is not a democracy. Also, the only thing I seem to note is that he's reordering on basis that he does not like the criticism at the top, but this is based on a discussion and in the order it is placed.
Tarikochi 19:22, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- I'm separating "Discussion" and "IRC" per RS:NOT#OFFSITE.
earth(t)
- Based on RS:NOT#OFFSITE: "References to outside chat are acceptable as long as the reference is not to a wiki-related discussion that was held."
- It is only talking about holding the discussion off-site, not the incidents that occurred on it.
Tarikochi 19:26, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Skill added that line the day after Cool Spy0 was nominated, incidentally. But an sysop-canidate shouldn't be held liable for things said off-site. We should come to an agreement instead of reverting each other's edits, because arguing is accomplishing nothing. =/
earth(t)
- The edit was made to specify what RS:NOT#OFFSITE means.
- We could easily promote a well-known hacker and scammer in RuneScape as a RSWiki admin as long as that person has been helpful in contributions if we cannot take things off-site liable. Besides, an RfA is an effective test of personality also, regardless of this "split personality" thing Vimescarrot mentioned.
- It is better just to leave it alone, in order, to follow that RuneScape is not a democracy.
Tarikochi 19:37, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Skill added that line the day after Cool Spy0 was nominated, incidentally. But an sysop-canidate shouldn't be held liable for things said off-site. We should come to an agreement instead of reverting each other's edits, because arguing is accomplishing nothing. =/
- I'm separating "Discussion" and "IRC" per RS:NOT#OFFSITE.
{{language}}
About this nomination...[edit source]
Wow. What the fucking hell happened? earth(t)
- This is the wiki, not IRC. Please don't use such language. Butterman62
03:36, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- You're aloud to use the word fuck in discussion as long you aren't being a total dick. --Whiplash 03:41, 27 November 2007 (UTC)