RuneScape talk:Clan Chat

From the RuneScape Wiki, the wiki for all things RuneScape
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This talk page is for discussing the RuneScape:Clan Chat page.

Clan Chat?[edit source]

For a while, people have been discussing on the possibility of having a clan chat. Now, after looking through past discussions, I have come to the conclusion that it would be near impossible to agree on one clan chat, because everyone wants their clan chat to be the official wiki one. Rendova even went through the trouble of creating a wikia account, "rs wikia" made just for clan chat, and people still couldn't agree. So, I think the best solution would be to have multiple clan chats. The clans chats would follow certain rules (feel free to add some), and there would be a list of the bottom of the page. Thoughts? Sysop crown.svgTes FanSysop crown.svg 17:29, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

I've added some meat to the page, but I don't really use clan chat much. Someone with better knowledge of the system might be able to advise... Pointy 18:01, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Tesfan, I don't think that's a good solution, because no one would ever be at the same chat. It would be like one or two people would be at every chat. I think it would be best if we just all had one. Butterman62Ice Barrage icon.png 21:24, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
The problem is, even when we said that "Rs wikia" would be the official one, people still would flock to different chats and what not. Sysop crown.svgTes FanSysop crown.svg 21:32, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Well, perhaps we could have a straw poll or something to decide the chat, and make that the offical runescape wiki chat, and post that up on the top of the screen, where all the important stuff is put. Butterman62Ice Barrage icon.png 22:01, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
I don't think multiple clan chats would work for the reason provided by Butterman. I think we just need to decide on one single clan chat to use. But to figure out which is best, we have to look at each of them. Find the pros and cons, weigh them out, and decide which is best suited. First, though, let's weigh out the pros and cons of dedicated hosts.


  • Names will usually be easier to remember and recognize.
  • Since there isn't any single person operating it (in the case of me and Rs Wikia, I'm happy just pretending I don't own that account. I disassociate myself from it almost entirely)
  • Everyone of higher authority is seen as equal, since no one person is in charge. In the clan chats of players such as Uloveme, Green358(or whatever numbers), and other "celebrities", you often find people arguing with admins saying stuff like "You aren't X, so you can't tell me what to do in his chat". However, in dedicated chats like Ad Busters and Elvemage (since he's banned and his admins are thus nulled), people accept admins as a collective leadership, not just cocky minions.
  • In undedicated chats, people often come and go with the host, so usually people are only in the clan chat when the host is online. I'm sure we've all seen this, since it's so common. We want people to always feel welcome in the chat, not just when the host is around.
  • Ranks can be assigned according to position on the wiki.
  • Friends unassociated with the wiki walking into the chat will never be an issue.


  • The only con I can think of is that there isn't a final authority to settle disputes between admins.

If you want to weigh the pros and cons of undedicated clan chats, just flip the numbers for dedicated around. Anyway, now we look at the various people who have offered to let RSW use their CCs.

Ilyas259 (undedicated host)

  • Respect As a person he's respected by the vast majority of the wiki.
  • Experience He knows what he's doing. That's always nice :D
  • Name It took me a week to get his name committed to memory. It might not be worth it for a visitor or a new member of RSW.

R S Wiki (unknown dedication)

  • Time Whoever made this is new enough that I know absolutely nothing about him(her?) except that he exists. So this means no reputation, no experience with the wiki, and, ultimately, unpredictability.
  • Name His name would take a few guesses by a curious someone who might want to see if we have a CC, but its purpose is a lot more obvious than Ilyas's, as well as being a lot easier to remember.

Rs Wikia (dedicated)

  • Name One of the best parts of it is the awesomely simple and obvious name. Too bad Rs Wiki was taken when I made this :|
  • Ownership I'm detached from it, so it's as if nobody owns it. I don't even have a rank on it, since I hold no positions on RSW. And the only time I ever log in on it is to update the friend list and ranks.
  • Openness I originally made it so that you would have to be added to enter, for the sake of keeping baddies such as Total Rune from playing in it while the cats are away. But if this were to become "official" and get a spot on the main page, or elsewhere, then that could change.

I added this name suggestion today for you to discuss Guthix cloak.pngInvincibility |Talk| |Edit Count| Magic.png 00:56, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

RScape Wiki (dedicated)

  • Name: Fits the wiki clan chat better than with a space between the r and s that is currently being used.
  • Experience: I don't want rate my own experience, but I do know how to do a majority of the tasks involving editing on this wiki. I am a trustworthy and reliable person and I would be happy to use this as the official clan chat. I have made quite a few edits, but I am not an admin and do not have rollback powers. Invincibility's Edit Count

I know more people had offered their CCs to the wiki, but these are the only 3 I can remember. Anyone got the names of the others? Rendova 00:54, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

If we had to have 1 dedicated channel, I would prefer RS wikia, as having a user run it somewhat implies that that user is the "leader". Also, I think that anyone should be able to come in, so people don't flood people with friend list requests, and so that they can just enter. Sysop crown.svgTes FanSysop crown.svg 01:08, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

My chat is only for rs wiki. Also, for people who don't frequent the forums: Administrators are general and can kick, rollback are captain other users are no rank. Lootshare is off, and anyone can join. Also, if you really don't trust me, I could give the account to an administrator, as I don't play on this account anyway. R S Wiki 01:39, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
None of us would allow you to give the account away, so we'd have a problem there. Rendova 02:31, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Since everyone seems to want the clan chats open, I've set Rs Wikia to allow anyone in and to talk. Rendova 22:16, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Tesfan, yes, having a user run it kinda makes that user look like the leader. Should we have Angela make one then or something? Otherwise, we have a straw poll or something? Butterman62Ice Barrage icon.png 03:30, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
'Aight, first off, Angela who? I hope you don't mean User:Angela.. she works for Wikia, and has nothing to do with RuneScape.
Secondly, why don't we keep using the IRC chat? It's easy to get to, anyone can join whenever, it's pretty easily customizable to our needs... if you want LootShare that badly, just group up when you need it. IRC is far better than the Clan Chat system, despite not actually being a part of RuneScape, but I see no good reason to move to Clan Chat. Oddlyoko talk 03:36, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Well, some people don't like constantly opening up a window to talk to fellow wiki members. But, yeah, I guess we could stay like that. Butterman62Ice Barrage icon.png 03:39, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Several options to help with that: 1) Tabbed windows in certain browsers. 2) mIRC or other chat clients. 3) If using (2), or without tabs, use ALT-TAB. Oddlyoko talk 03:43, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
IRC likes to lag me, so I try to stay away from it unless I'm not on rs. And I never could figure out how to get irc apps to work >.< Rendova 19:27, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
That stinks... I still think IRC is the most viable option - the best point being that it's always up, even if the 'owner' isn't. CCs are rather unwieldy in that regard. Besides, you can always ask someone else around here for help setting up something like mIRC. Oddlyoko talk 22:38, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Players[edit source]

I had always thought that Ilyas259 hosted the Clan Chat every time. Who are these other players? We never used them. White partyhat old.png C Teng talk 02:58, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

I am your father... but seriously. Ily was, and I presume still is, hugely dedicated to his chat being rsw's cc. The way things up there worked out was everyone wanted a clan chat, everyone wanted it to be theirs (why? idk.), and nobody was willing to take "no" for an answer. It worked the same way unsuccessful marriages do. The "other people" up there were just the next most likely to be chosen. Rendova 19:57, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

:|[edit source]

There is 6 "suggested" clans. That is 5 to many FredeTalk 16:35, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, we are most likely officially changing it to just R S Wiki. White partyhat old.png C Teng talk 00:52, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Forumadmins are admins as well?[edit source]

Are forumadmins given the captain rank as well?

InstantWinstonDragon 2h sword old.pngold edits | new edits

02:05, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

They're currently given the lieutenant rank. Should this be changed? White partyhat old.png C Teng talk 02:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

I think they should be captains, because the clan chat is primarily a community thing, and forum admins mostly deal with community matters which means they could be just as mature as an administrator if someone in the chat was being disruptive.

InstantWinstonDragon 2h sword old.pngold edits | new edits

22:17, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

i cant join R S Wikia[edit source]

Lol my rank is too low to enter -.- Buzz (Talk#P ) 18:09, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Believe it or not...[edit source]

Believe it or not, I'm an admin, so why am I ranked a recruit? €MØŠwô®L[) 04:17, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Oh, sorry, accident. I'll fix it as soon as this problem is fixed. White partyhat old.png C Teng talk 22:41, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

hehe[edit source]

I'm rokua6 in both runescape wiki and runescape but use Poke longer (lvl 109 in members and 104 in free) as one of the members because thats my main account and i would like him to be here :D  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rokua6 (talk) on 22:07, 30 January 2009 (UTC).

Ranks[edit source]

This section is a bit out of date? FredeTalk 17:15, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

List of Ranked Clan Chat Users[edit source]

Besides the obvious ranked clan chat members like admins, we need to have a list of regular wiki users that are ranked in the clan chat on the project page, with their Runescape usernames! Additionally, there needs to be a way to put your name down on a list somewhere to apply to get a rank in the clan chat! Support and comment below: Guthix cloak.pngInvincibility |Talk| |Edit Count| Magic.png 01:51, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Here is a list of current Sergeants:

These players were voted to have Sergeant powers by the Clan Chat. White partyhat old.png C Teng talk 19:30, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Uhhhh... Proof they got votes? Christine 19:31, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Well, no... we started doing this while we were discussing how we should rank people. More kicking powers were needed due to a lot of spam on the Clan Chat, so we started giving out a few kicking powers. But I definitely agree that we need a better way to decide to rank them. A "Requests for Sergeantship" page was once suggested. Or I could take screenshots of the voting, but the bad thing about that is, people that are offline won't be able to vote. White partyhat old.png C Teng talk 19:47, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Exactly, I suggest a page here. It isn't that I disagree that those people should have ranks, it just needs to be documented from now on. Christine 19:50, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

RS:NOT#OFFSITE was right, I just what what you said wrong. We cannot promote based on CC attendance. Karlis (talk) (contribs) 19:52, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

There is a discussion on this at Forum:RfC and RfI. White partyhat old.png C Teng talk 19:54, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks C Teng! I totally agree with the RFKP that was suggested by someone on Karil's discussion, however no one seems to be continuing that discussion any more, so I put what I thought here. I hope that the wiki will soon come to a conclusion on this controversial topic! If you have any thoughts on how to implement some sort of request for kicking powers, or any other views on the subject I would love to here them, because the discussion on Karil's chat is limited! :-) I may not be a well known user of the wiki, but I have been in the CC and some people get a little carried away with their kicking powers. I hope that a comprehensive set of rules can be developed and put on the main page. There seems to be rules spread all throught discussions, and I haven't seen an agreement on the religion and politics issue yet. Guthix cloak.pngInvincibility |Talk| |Edit Count| Magic.png 03:36, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

uh... i dont know what to call this[edit source]

i bet we will be forever in disagrement with the rules no matter what we will probily always bicker about the rule that the clan should have just my opion i may be wrong but few things are perfect -- hatchet.png

17:38, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Ranks[edit source]

How do you get a rank in the clan chat? --Milestone cape (50).pngAmeobea10Talk Contribs #Virtus mask.png 00:10, 20 March 2009 (UTC) P.S. I'm not watching this page, so send replies to this to my talk page.

Ranking me[edit source]

Hey, I'd just like to say PLEASE DONT RANK ME!! My rs name is Utor Vir , and the account is currently being hacked . And a friend has told me he saw me near the KBD, and when people talked to "me", "I" replyed "**** off *****".  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Theg721 (talk) on 16:18, 3 April 2009 (UTC).

WP:IAR[edit source]

Be careful. What you've got on this page are some very definite rules. Hard rules are not conducive to running a clan chat smoothly; not only does it mean ranks feel restricted by them, people will also use them as justification to be assholes by breaking the spirit of the rule if not the letter of the rule (This is all covered in WP:IAR, I'm sure). Ideally, someone needs to reword the rules to make them more guideline-ish. JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot 10:39, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

WP:GAME covers much of what I'm thinking. I can think of a few regulars who do this. JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot 10:40, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Mmm, I see what you mean. I'd favour a rewording from "rules" to "guidelines (to be taken with a pinch of salt)", and changes to the rules themselves where necessary. Quest.png Gaz Lloyd 7:^]Events!99s 22:37, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

New rules[edit source]

The rules as they are now are all well and good in principle, but are lacking something in practice. I suggest a rewrite. So I'm going to rewrite them. Tell me what you think:

  • All users must follow Jagex’s 13 Rules, as usual. However, we might have to “tweak” rule 11 – Obviously, we will have to mention, refer to, tell people to look, etc., the Wiki many times. Justifying this by saying it's not "advertising" is useless - Jagex won't agree when we get reported, and our opinion is irrelevant on that.
  • Don't be a dick. Don't start arguments for no reason. Don't spam. Don't be deliberately disruptive. This rule is kept deliberately vague, as most people know when they aren't being productive. However, there are some examples which are not necessarily so obvious to everyone.
    • Don't sing. We aren't on the same emotional level, and what's more, we can't hear it. So it won't affect us in the same way, and will achieve nothing other than annoying people for being disruptive.
    • Don't levelup-spam. We may want to know you get 99 Fishing, but not if you tell us with seven lines of zeros. "Woot!" Is just as good as "w000000000000000000000000000000000000t".
    • Comment on other people's opinions, by all means, but don't argue, and don't insult. Opinions are opinions, and by definition, can't be wrong. It's generally best to keep religious, political and other controversial material to private chat. You may be able to hold a mature conversation about them, but there's no guarantee everyone else can.
    • Don't give anyone special treatment. This applies to ranks and non-ranks alike. Ranks aren't gods; non-ranks aren't peons. We're all equal.

When these rules are broken, there are not necessarily any hard and fast rules on how to deal with them. If you're being disruptive, you will probably get a warning or two, then be kicked. But ranks are ranked because their judgement is deemed trsutworthy enough to know when to kick and when to give second chances. Don't just tell them we can't kick you without a warning. They may be justified in kicking you for that, as it's a prime example of having the wrong attitude. Just use your head and make it a fun place to be!

JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot 19:56, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

I fully and totally agree with this. I see a lot of these examples of spam, disruptiveness, and other things that is happening in the CC. I feel like this rewrite could help better the current principles and rules that we have and will help overall keep the rule-breaking to a near minimum. Rollback crown.svg Spencer (Talk | Edits | Contribs) 20:04, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
I think the rules above are a good template. in a nutshell: do act like a moron, and you will not be kicked. ‎Easter egg.pngAtlandy 20:26, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Agreed. Rollback crown.svg Spencer (Talk | Edits | Contribs) 20:28, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Assuming there are no disagreements, I'll replace the old rules with the new ones when I wake up tomorrow. If someone does object after I've changed them, we can revert it while we discuss exactly why. JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot 20:30, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

I totaly agree with new rules but still there needs to be a warning before any kick. -- Defence Waterkunai1 Talk # fluffy bunniesArmadyl symbol.png 20:43, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Even to someone who comes in every hour, on the hour, just to spam? JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot 20:44, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
True. I think they should get 1-2 warnings the first time they break a rule, then if they are kicked and they come back afterwards, they can be kicked without warning if they continue to break rules. Rollback crown.svg Spencer (Talk | Edits | Contribs) 20:46, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
There are many extenuating circumstances for both sides - kicking instantly, and giving warnings. I think these are all obvious enough in themselves to rely on a ranks' judgement; they're trusted to be ranked for that reason, right? JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot 20:47, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

right! but it has to be an obius spammer not just any person. PS:can we archive this im lagging. -- Defence Waterkunai1 Talk # fluffy bunniesArmadyl symbol.png 20:50, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

I agree with these rules, especially the singing, it can be quite irritating at times ;-). Karil's crossbow.png Xi_Karilz_Ix Fire cape.png 20:54, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

The rules are the main page are fine. The ones on this page should be guidelines and not hard and fast rules. I see a lot of personal preferences in these (on the talk page). While we are all equal, we are not all alike. Six To Go!Hatchenator TalkContribsGreat Transportation 21:07, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Could you be more specific? JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot 21:12, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
"Don't Sing/Don't Announce Level Up", you may as well say, don't talk about your day or don't say what slayer assignment you have. The Chat Channel is a communication forum for everyone. Just because you choose not to enjoy some conversations, doesn't mean they should be restricted. The Chat Channel should be a place where we get to know each other better, which can only ease the interactions on the wiki arena. I have left chat several times because I didn't care for the conversation, which is always a choice available. Six To Go!Hatchenator TalkContribsGreat Transportation 21:28, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Never gonna give you up
Never gonna let you down
Never gonna tell a lie
And desert you
This isn't a conversation. Equally,
is nothing more than spam. I didn't say "Don't announce level up"; in fact, I encouraged "woot". If you *discuss* the 99, fine. "That's a relief! Took ages!" or whatever. I'd encourage it. It's better than the alternative. Mindless wooping does not a conversation make. JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot 00:24, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

I'm fine with all of them except the "level up/spamming" one. If someone gets a partyhat from the partyroom, I don't care if they spam a few lines. Just as it doesn't go on for ages. I believe the CC should be one of the less serious sides of the Wiki, everything is so serious it seems. It makes me depressed in a way. The clan chat should be there to vent some of those emotions. I like saying fluffy bunnies cause it makes me happy. =) Prayer.png Jedi Talk HS Log Tracker Summoning.png 00:40, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I'm fine with all of them the level up/spamming one. Reasons per jedi, except the fluffy bunnies. o.O Santa hat.png Powers38 おはようヾ(´・ω・`) 00:45, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Per Jedi :-). Karil's crossbow.png Xi_Karilz_Ix Fire cape.png 02:25, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

I do hate levelup spam. But since they're only guidelines anyway, we could theoretically remove the whole thing and it shouldn't make a difference. So we're okay with it if I remove the levelup spam section? I'll do it tonight if no-one objects... JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot 09:50, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Per Jedi. I like that you note in the end it is up to ranked members of the CC to monitor the chat. Many kicks are judgment calls, and so we depend on the ranked members to be fair and responsible. Horsehead Talk 14:05, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Impressive. You have my support for those rules. Guthix crozier.png Eternalseed  Guthix's Book of Balance.png 15:27, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Sounds good. I also hate it when people spam the chat whenever they gain a level. A simple "Yay 80 Mining" is good enough.  Tien  15:39, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Phew...I'm not the only one, then! JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot 17:59, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Well I think it is one thing to say w00t or something for a level up message that people can always foresee, but I'm talking about really rare drops and stuff like that that is a lot more exciting. Yes, a level up w00t should never be more then 2 lines but if someone just got their first fire cape or recieved a huge drop like I metioned earlier, they should be able to w00t for a couple lines at least. Don't take the fun out of the CC. -_- Prayer.png Jedi Talk HS Log Tracker Summoning.png 18:04, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

OpinionVimes I think that "wooting" may be accepted if all the ranked persons in clan chat agreed (it has to be a good reason).

so who likes this idea? -- Defence Waterkunai1 Talk # fluffy bunniesArmadyl symbol.png 18:11, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Well, I'm not sure anyone would ever say "I just got 99, would anyone mind if I spammed your convo for a bit?" Jedi, does it really not bother you to have your screen space wasted by repeated messages? =\ JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot 22:03, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Also, can't they just woot in public/private chat? JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot 22:08, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
It's a coincidence you say that vimes, cause I have in fact been asked if I would allow a user to spam in the chat. As it was just them and I I said fine, lol, but your new rules or guidelines seems very fine to me =) 22:29, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Commenting - since this user asked before and a rank said it's okay, this would clearly not be a kickable offence, because that rank made that judgement call. In essence I'm trying to put the power in the hands of the ranks, not the rules... JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot 22:34, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

One more rule?[edit source]

This is just one I want general opinion on. It worked well in avoiding depressing and ultimately unenjoyable conversations in another chat that I know. It's "No discussing Zezima." This extend to include people like...I don't know them, I'm sure you do. What do you think of it? JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot 22:31, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Vimes whats "No discussing Zezima." ? , how about that all ranked persons at that time at clan chat discuss if ??? can woot or no.

-- Defence Waterkunai1 Talk # fluffy bunniesArmadyl symbol.png 23:49, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Don't talk about him, don't mention him, don't discuss whatever achievements he, or any other highly-ranked player, have made. The rule has two purposes:
  1. It stops really, really, really boring discussions.
  2. Such conversations always, always, and up with comments like "lol he's a no-life nerd" and "he definitely cheated to get his xp" and "I saw zezima! He's my friend!" and so on and so on. It's just unproductive. Mindless - and inaccurate - flaming, an interesting conversation does not make. JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot 00:03, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

OK but what about my idea?

-- Defence Waterkunai1 Talk # fluffy bunniesArmadyl symbol.png 00:07, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you meant... JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot 00:19, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
Ok let me get this straight, we can't talk about Zezima, but we can talk about Yogosun, Gertjaars, King Duffy, etc, correct? You just don't want anything to do with Zezima? I really don't see a problem with talking about any "famous" player in RuneScape. Yes, it can get annoying if someone starts spamming, "I <3 ZEZIMA!!! OMFG I met him! WOOOOOOOOOO!!!!", but just because some people start random and just plain stupid conversations about him doesn't mean you have to completely ban any discussion about him. I mean, some people might actually have a nice and polite conversation about him, saying things like, "I wonder how Zezima is coming along with him leveling his Summoning.", or "I wonder how many skills he has that have a max of 200 mil exp?" or quotes of that nature. I say if we hear someone randomly outbursting things about Zezima on how they "love him" or they've "met him", we should just kindly and politely ask them to stop and if they continue, hand them a kick. We don't have to stop this particular topic from the CC just because of a few players who act like total Zezima stalkers. Rollback crown.svg Spencer (Talk | Edits | Contribs) 00:23, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
This extend to include people like...I don't know them, I'm sure you do.</quote> This includes players like...those you mentioned, that I've never heard of. I've seen scores of player-based discussions like this, and not one ended nicely. JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot 00:25, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
In my opinion this proposed "no mentioning Zezima" rule is bull***t. That's completely unfair. Prayer.png Jedi Talk HS Log Tracker Summoning.png 02:39, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Another addition[edit source]

  • Never claim to win an argument - whether you've won it or not. It serves only to antagonise.

JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot 00:17, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Good idea this may stop flaming. -- Defence Waterkunai1 Talk # fluffy bunniesArmadyl symbol.png 00:21, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Agreed with this proposal too. Rollback crown.svg Spencer (Talk | Edits | Contribs) 00:23, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Can we stop adding lame rules and just tell people to use common sense and don't act like idiots? Prayer.png Jedi Talk HS Log Tracker Summoning.png 02:40, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

As per Jedi. Karis Talk to me 10:47, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Is our clan chat unpopular?[edit source]

Is it just me or is it everytime I enter R S wikia clan chat there is only around 10 people in the channel? For those of you who are in clan chat, what do you do? --Disk of returning.png Blackhole252 Disk of returning.png 20:23, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

It never seems unpopular to me. White partyhat old.png C Teng talk 11:08, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
It doesn't seem unpopular to me either. A plus to having a small amount of people is that it is easier to have a conversation with the others. ~MuzTalk 11:13, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Nope, me neither. I'm often more active in discussions in the CC when there's less people in it than when there's more; its a lot easier to have a proper conversation with someone. Quest.png Gaz Lloyd 7:^]Events!99s 19:48, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
It doesn't seem unpopular to me either: It is very popular with the people in it. And it's a good size to have and follow conversations. Horsehead Talk 04:04, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
It seems popular to me, and we don't want too many people like stated above. It's just that at about 2-3am Pacific time it is empty, but I don't see a problem there. Most of the times it has a good number of people in it. Prayer.png Jedi Talk HS Log Tracker Summoning.png 18:02, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Only ten? o.O JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot 22:41, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

errr... The clan chat isnt for getting popularity or it is?-- Defence Waterkunai1 Talk # fluffy bunniesArmadyl symbol.png 15:31, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Merge[edit source]

Evil yanks said this should be merged with RuneScape:Off-site, so I'm going to start the discussion.

I oppose - This page is too big for that, and Template:Main works fine on RS:OS. White partyhat old.png C Teng talk 00:43, January 18, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - Maybe put the {{main}} article there, then put this page into a subpage of RuneScape:Off-site? scoot4.pngscooties 00:52, January 18, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose merge, neutral on move to subpage - Too big to merge per myself here; I don't see the huge need to move it to a subpage, but I wouldn't be bothered if it was, as long as the redirects are updated. Quest.png Gaz Lloyd 7:^]Events!99s 15:57, January 18, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose merge - There is a nice amount of information here that would become cumbersome if merged into the off-site article. I think it's fine where it is. Air rune.png Tollerach hates SoF Fire rune.png 09:04, February 3, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose merge, meh about subpage - I don't really mind whether it is moved onto a sub-page or not, though I agree that the merge would make the off-site page too big. Unicorn horn dust.png Evil Yanks talk 05:59, February 25, 2010 (UTC)

[email protected]@@ We're all guna dieeee!!!!! AWEOBucket detail.pngrwojy 06:01, February 25, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose merge - Per all. --Coolnesse 15:08, February 26, 2010 (UTC)

List[edit source]

Shouldn't there be a list of ranked users? --Nup(T) 09:50, January 27, 2010 (UTC)

Nevermind I found it. --Nup(T) 11:29, February 1, 2010 (UTC)

Update...[edit source]

Updated the "Ranks" section in regards to the recent addition of the Corporal rank, as well as the re-opening of Requests for a sergeant rank. To my knowledge all of the current information is up-to-date and accurate, but rewording or additions may be needed. Red partyhat detail.png Pen Draig Talk King Black Dragon.png 01:35, August 16, 2011 (UTC)

Confused[edit source]

Hey, I am really confused on how to actually sign up and be able to join the C.C.. It seems very restricted for a site that openly allows edifications. I mean, how inviting is a completely restricted C.C.? It isn't. 19:04, December 18, 2012 (UTC)

You login and contact someone able to invite - probably by joining the cc as a guest first. Quest.png Gaz Lloyd 7:^]Events!99s 23:18, December 18, 2012 (UTC)

Front page advertisement.[edit source]

Having this clan chat advertise itself on the front page leaves a sour taste in my mouth. The whole point of the wiki is so everyone can contribute and everyone is welcome, and while I agree that a RSWiki clan is a good idea, I would rather not see it advertised on the front page, as it is not strictly runescape content.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Eva Pilot1 (talk).

It's a clan about the wiki with other wiki members... It's really just another chat medium that has a couple extra benefits and no one is being asked to join. There's nothing wrong with it and besides, everyone is welcome there too. MolMan 02:28, March 3, 2013 (UTC)

Old School Runescape[edit source]

Do we have a clan chat for Old School Runescape? Fort33dople (talk) 03:41, June 25, 2016 (UTC) [Edit] Fort33dople (talk) 03:43, June 25, 2016 (UTC)

Yes [1] Magic logs detail.pngIsobelTalk page 08:55, June 25, 2016 (UTC)