RuneScape:Requests for deletion/Battle for the Stone of Jas

From the RuneScape Wiki, the wiki for all things RuneScape
Jump to: navigation, search
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. The result was No consensus.

Battle for the Stone of Jas

This page is unnecessary, there was no battle for this page to be continue as the only "battle" was within the the final stage, Seren, Zaros, vs Sliske, us vs his wights and him later on This page counts our fight with Nomad in the beginning, but it wasn't a battle, it was a two person fight. This page really doesn't need to be up, as the Sixth Age already gives us a small information about it. It is a waste of space.

Delete - As nominator Quest.png Adventurerrr Talk Quest.png

Comment To respond to most in here, The assassination of Guthix had more than one battle, and it was against several groups. This page, being a summary of the quest actually points out one battle. A two person fight is a battle, but most pages just like this records a big one, and puts in army that supported them in battle. If this is meant to be kept in the end then I suppose we can name change it. But this page only has one major battle, that is us fighting with Two gods, 7 legendary wights, vs Sliske and his army. The beginning was just a fight for point. Even if it is counted as a battle for some people it isn't one that deserves notice as a page. Over all if this page is kept, then it should be name changed to Race for the stone of Jas, Or something like that. Quest.png Adventurerrr Talk Quest.png 22:02, March 5, 2018 (UTC)

Keep, possibly rename - It details a significant event in the Sixth Age. And yer logic can easily be applied to any page regarding a significant battle - the Assassination of Guthix page, fer example, contains the fight between the player and Kree'arra (a 2-person fight, which was part of the larger battle), and can easily be covered by Sixth Age. Is it a waste of space? What I've done Ciphrius Kane Talk 14:27, February 22, 2018 (UTC)

Keep - We need that kind of information spread across multiple pages to keep the readers entertained on various pages. You can rewrite or add information, there's no need to delete, really, as you said, Sixth Age give us a small information, not all of it. Maximus Gugu of ArmadylQuick chat button.png: Your Friendly Neighborhood Artist. 15:34, February 22, 2018 (UTC)

Keep - I agree with Ciph and Maxi. The Sixth Age page gives very little information about it. This expansion on the page makes it not a waste of space. Maybe the page is a stub. But that just means we should work to build the page up and not just delete it. pWkk5s5.pngConstitution.png 15:45, February 22, 2018 (UTC)

Keep - Per others above. Farming-icon.png Salix of Prifddinas (Talk) Prifddinas lodestone icon.png 15:51, February 22, 2018 (UTC)

Keep - A 2 person fight qualifies as a battle in my opinion. Seeing as how the Sixth Age article only gives the reader a small amount of information about the subject; this article should definitely stay as the source for more in-depth information. I also feel that granularity applies here as this event is indeed a notable one. Pernix cowl detail.png MAGE-KIL-R (Talk)Zaros symbol.png 00:39, February 23, 2018 (UTC)

Delete - This page is literally a summary of Sliske's Endgame, made further useless by the branching nature of the quest, making the whole page wildly vague. Not useful in any way, shape, or form, and won't even be easily found by players because anyone looking for the story of Sliske's Endgame will GO to the Sliske's Endgame page. Amascut symbol.svg Amascut Ia Morte 13:09, March 5, 2018 (UTC)

Closed - No consensus. --LiquidTalk 18:44, March 9, 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. No further edits should be made to this page.