RuneScape:Featured images/archive-replacement

From the RuneScape Wiki, the wiki for all things RuneScape
Jump to: navigation, search
  Archive directory   Delisting archive   Replacement archive   Obsolete archive   20   21   22   23    
Archive
This page or section is an archive.
Please do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to the current project page or contact an administrator for aid if no talk page exists.

Nominations for replacement

Zanik

[[File:Zanikart.png|right|200px]] Original image: File:Zanik chathead.png

  • Support - As nominator. I think that the second image is more colorful and more visually appealing. I think RuneScape offers several better images compared to their floating chat heads. Air rune.png Tollerach hates SoF Fire rune.png 01:13, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Oppose - I prefer the images here to be ingame, capturing the perfect shot can be hard. When it is just given by Jagex, it doesn't follow the criteria The image is taken from RuneScape game client. ~MuzTalk 02:42, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Visit the RuneScape homepage - its on the top of the page there. Why do we need to put it on our main page too? The old image is fine. Quest.png Gaz Lloyd 7:^]Events!99s 11:35, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Closed - X mark.svg Nomination is unsuccessful.   az talk   15:43, 15 April 2009 (UTC)



Avatar of Creation(2)

[[File:CREATION AVATAR.png|right|175px]] Original image: Image:Battle for the Avatar of Creation.png
Description: A calm picture of the Avatar of Creation at Soul Wars.
Reason: Re-uploaded a whole new picture as someone said that the old one is too cluttered.

  • Support as nominator: Replaced the image for a more 'calm' look on the Creation Avatar Requiem1160 15:08, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Oppose replacement: with the same angle can be ok. --Dindirindin 16:21, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment: It took along time to get the avatar in the camera focus, and in the other picture he's dieing/attacking - this was taken in a Tie World where no one is allowed near the opposing team's avatar
  • Comment: This is why the other image description is battle for the avatar of creation, because is a battle, not a image of the avatar.--Dindirindin 18:25, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment - This image is not used in mainspace. Please ensure this image is used in an article.   az talk   09:27, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment Added this picture to an article. Requiem1160 11:27, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment - This is a great pic and I bet it took some time to capture, but the other pic is also very nice, so I'm neutral. Air rune.png Tollerach hates SoF Fire rune.png 23:09, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Closed - X mark.svg Nomination is unsuccessful.   az talk   15:26, 5 May 2009 (UTC)



Dragon Forge

DragonForge3.png

Original image: File:DragonForge2.png
Previous nomination: RuneScape:Featured images/archive6#Dragon Forge/Archive 6
Reason: Anti-Aliased, No player in the way and shows alot more due it being bigger.

  • Support Replacement - as Nominator. Nephilim RetiredGuthix stole.png 21:40, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Strong support - Per Req kitty.pngPsycho Robot talkSilver bar.png 04:56, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Strong support - Per nom. Ancient talisman.png Oil4 Talk 17:10, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Strong support - Per Req Makxtrl Talk 17:17, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Support - No player makes it better. ~MuzTalk 17:24, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Closed - Yes check.svg Nomination for replacement is successful. C.ChiamTalk 12:13, 28 August 2009 (UTC)



Paterdomus

Replacement image

Original image: File:Paterdomus Basement.png
Description: The mausoleum of the Paterdomus temple.
Reason: It's bigger, anti-aliased, and has no player in it.

  • Support - As nominator. --Iiii I I I 21:50, October 21, 2009 (UTC)
    • Forgot to say it was replacing File:Paterdomus Basement.png. --Iiii I I I 21:53, October 21, 2009 (UTC)
  • Support - It looks nicer, I think the lighting is better. kitty.pngPsycho Robot talkSilver bar.png 21:57, October 21, 2009 (UTC)
  • Support - Per psycho, and I like the angle and the beautiful cobble stone isn't over pixelated. On another note, did anyone ever notice the top of the pillars look like crushed skittles or m&ms?--Porp1 23:55, October 21, 2009 (UTC)
  • Support - No player, and has AA. ~MuzTalk 00:09, October 22, 2009 (UTC)
  • Weak oppose - The original was slightly brighter. Improve the brightness to match the current image.   az talk   09:00, October 22, 2009 (UTC)
    • That killed the atmosphere of the image. Adult chameleon (automatic).png Anurin Talk · Sign! . 11:25, October 22, 2009 (UTC)
  • Support - Better detail (AA) and lighting. Adult chameleon (automatic).png Anurin Talk · Sign! . 11:25, October 22, 2009 (UTC)
  • Weak Support - Better now, although the lighting is a little dark  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chessmaster (talk) on 18:19, October 22, 2009 (UTC).
  • Support - Amazing picture, a really dramatic shot. ↁƗҼŚ ỈƦẲ  19:40, October 22, 2009 (UTC)
  • Support - Looks better than the old one. Ancient talisman.png Oil4 Talk 07:44, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
  • Support - While it may be a bit too dark, it looks more natural then the previous one. Unicorn horn dust.png Evil Yanks talk 07:46, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
  • Support - No player in the way, larger, shows the whole room with AA quality. Quest point cape.pngLil Diriz 77 Talk Summoning-icon.png 17:13, October 24, 2009 (UTC)
  • Closed - Yes check.svg Successful. kitty.pngPsycho Robot talkSilver bar.png 00:28, October 28, 2009 (UTC)



TzHaar City

Replacement image

Previous image: File:Molten.png
Description: A lava-filled region beneath Karamja Volcano.
Reason: Bigger and has no player.

  • Support - As nominator. --Iiii I I I 21:50, October 21, 2009 (UTC)
    • Forgot to say it was replacing File:Molten.png. --Iiii I I I 21:53, October 21, 2009 (UTC)
  • Support - The colours look more vivid, and no player makes it better. kitty.pngPsycho Robot talkSilver bar.png 21:57, October 21, 2009 (UTC)
  • Support - I was going to comment (I actually already did, but withdrew my vote) that the floor isn't good, but then I noticed that it is nominated for replacement, not featured; with that, I support. --Porp1 23:58, October 21, 2009 (UTC)
  • Support - No player in image. ~MuzTalk 00:09, October 22, 2009 (UTC)
  • Support - No player = Epic picture  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chessmaster (talk) on 18:19, October 22, 2009 (UTC).
  • Support - As per all Lol. Good move nominating this one. ↁƗҼŚ ỈƦẲ  19:42, October 22, 2009 (UTC)
  • Support - Per Dies Irae. Ancient talisman.png Oil4 Talk 07:45, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
  • Support - Per everybody LolManyman (talk) 21:16, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
  • Weak Support - I like how the other image shows a higher number of Tzhaar, But this one doesn't have a player so it gets my vote, just.  -Dr Merz  22:17, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
    • This one has seven and a half TzHaar, the other one only has five. --Iiii I I I 22:30, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
  • Support - More vivid colors, no player standing in the way. Per all. Quest point cape.pngLil Diriz 77 Talk Summoning-icon.png 17:13, October 24, 2009 (UTC)
  • Closed - Yes check.svg Successful. kitty.pngPsycho Robot talkSilver bar.png 00:29, October 28, 2009 (UTC)



Avatar of Creation(3)

[[File:CREATION AVATAR.png|250x250px|right]]

Battle for the Avatar of Creation.png

Description: The avatar at peace.
Reason: The previous has health bars, player, and the angle makes it look like it is falling backwards, while this one shows it standing upright.
Previous nomination: #Avatar of Creation(2)

  • Support As nominator -- sig1.png Spam me w/ lolcatsPottery statuette detail.png Is <insert name here> awesome? I don't know, let me check... 02:55, November 21, 2009 (UTC)
  • Weak Support Cool. He's at peace now. . . but in my opinion it would be better with a transparent background, but that's just me--216.175.117.212 06:18, November 21, 2009 (UTC)
  • Slight Support It looks much better now, but he looks too cut off, but still pretty good!----Verr 16:59, November 21, 2009 (UTC)
  • Weak Support -It's better than the last one, but as MG said. . . he looks sliced off. Astral rune.png Jhanely Soul rune.png
  • Comment - This image must be replaced due to the fact that the old image is orphaned, and a decision was made on https://runescape.wiki/wiki/RuneScape:Featured_images/archive0#Avatar_of_Creation to replace it. -- sig1.png Spam me w/ lolcatsPottery statuette detail.png Is <insert name here> awesome? I don't know, let me check... 01:02, November 23, 2009 (UTC)
    Porp, no decision was made to replace it. If you see the link provided above, the nomination for replacement was unsuccessful. C.ChiamTalk 02:04, November 23, 2009 (UTC)
    Based on my understanding of the image policy, the currently featured image should be de-listed immediately because it is no longer used in the mainspace... right? kitty.pngPsycho Robot talkSilver bar.png 02:07, November 23, 2009 (UTC)
    This is kind of an unforeseen circumstance, it should simply be readded to an article rather than delisted because of something like this. C.ChiamTalk 02:10, November 23, 2009 (UTC)
    Caleb, here is a quote: "Closed - Image has been nominated for replacement. [Az] 09:22, 27 April 2009 (UTC)"; it says that it is for replacement. Furthermore, the old one is orphaned; here is a list of pages that it links to:
    RuneScape:Featured images
    RuneScape:Featured images/archive1
    RuneScape:Featured images/archive0
    Forum:New Main Page and pagetitle"
    It does not state a valid page that is linked to, therefore, it does not qualify to remain a featured image. -- sig1.png Spam me w/ lolcatsPottery statuette detail.png Is <insert name here> awesome? I don't know, let me check... 02:09, November 23, 2009 (UTC)
    Yes, I had already checked that out, thank you very much... I'm not sure what you are trying to tell me with the quote, all it says is that the image has been nominated for replacement. I don't think that you are viewing the correct nomination, you should be looking at RuneScape:Featured images/archive0#Avatar of Creation - Replacement, which was the unsuccessful nomination for replacement. It was previously linked to in an article, so to rectify the situation, we simply need to link to it in an article. C.ChiamTalk 02:14, November 23, 2009 (UTC)
    After observing the link for a while, I noticed somethng: there was only one vote, other than the nominator, and the rest were comments, so this one has a good chance of replacing that other image (yes I am aware that this is irrelevant, I'm changing the subject) -- sig1.png Spam me w/ lolcatsPottery statuette detail.png Is <insert name here> awesome? I don't know, let me check... 02:20, November 23, 2009 (UTC)
  • Delist both - I don't feel I need to say much. Both are not the greatest images in the world. Unicorn horn dust.png Evil Yanks talk 03:56, November 24, 2009 (UTC)
    Only one of them is currently a featured image, btw. C.ChiamTalk 04:06, November 24, 2009 (UTC)
    I wasn't thinking when I wrote that. I meant don't make either a featured article. Unicorn horn dust.png Evil Yanks talk 04:11, November 24, 2009 (UTC)
    Lol, featured image, not article. C.ChiamTalk 04:23, November 24, 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment - I have a transparent version of [[:File:CREATION AVATAR.png]]. Should I upload it? --Iiii I I I 22:45, November 25, 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment - I honestly like the one with a background more, but ok, I guess -- sig1.png Spam me w/ lolcatsPottery statuette detail.png Is <insert name here> awesome? I don't know, let me check... 22:53, November 25, 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment - Lol, when I first saw the transparent avatar, I first though of uncle Sam, saying "I want YOU to play soul wars" -- sig1.png Spam me w/ lolcatsPottery statuette detail.png Is <insert name here> awesome? I don't know, let me check... 00:09, November 26, 2009 (UTC)
    [1] --Iiii I I I 00:12, November 26, 2009 (UTC)
  • Change to Support -It looks much better to me now. Less grassy, but now I am used to seeing the avatar with a background. o.o Astral rune.png Jhanely Soul rune.png
  • Comment - The image has been changed during the nomination. The new image should be re-nominated. This is to avoid any confusions during the nomination process.   az talk   04:00, November 27, 2009 (UTC)
  • Slight Oppose - I absolutely love the old one. The old one is much more natural, with the people fighting and the Avatar dodging/turning, while the new one simply shows a weird monster staring at a camera ready to take it's picture. The first one would be great for Infobox Monster, but the second one is the one worth featured image. Quest point cape.pngLil Diriz 77 Talk Summoning-icon.png 23:45, November 27, 2009 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Per what Diriz said. It shows the chaotic nature of the minigame. Ancient talisman.png Oil4 Talk 22:14, November 28, 2009 (UTC)
  • Notice of banana - I don't feel as if consensus has been achieved, so I'm letting it run another week. kitty.pngPsycho Robot talkSilver bar.png 22:18, November 28, 2009 (UTC)
  • Neutral - I'm a little confused with all of the changes, but now I think I like the old one, per Lil diriz, because the new one looks a bit odd, and... the old one is more normal. Astral rune.png Jhanely Soul rune.png 00:17, November 29, 2009 (UTC)
  • Closed - X mark.svg Nomination is unsuccessful; lack of consensus. C.ChiamTalk 14:40, December 5, 2009 (UTC)



Water altar

[[File:Water altar.png|250x250px|right|Replacement image]] Reason: The angle is better to me, and it's more balanced.
Previous image: File:Water Altar inside.png
Previous nomination: RuneScape:Featured images/archive3#Water altar

  • Support - As nominator. --Iiii I I I 00:31, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
  • Support - Anything supported by the the robot earns an instant support by me. --Fruit.Smoothie 04:18, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
    Was there a new "Worship the Robot" prayer included in the recently added Ancient Curses? OMG! lol. Quest point cape.pngLil Diriz 77 Talk Summoning-icon.png 05:32, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
    Nope, but there should be one. 05:55, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
  • Weak Oppose - The fog in the background annoys me.  Zaros symbol.png    « Iceman »      12:35, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
  • Oppose - I think the past version has a little bit more detail, and shows just the altar, not the sky. ~MuzTalk 21:43, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
  • Oppose - The perfectly straight horizon which splits blue and white seems unnatural. Per above. Quest point cape.pngLil Diriz 77 Talk Summoning-icon.png 05:32, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Per Lil Diriz. Miasmic Blitz icon.png Hapi007 Talk! Sign! . 14:09, December 24, 2009 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Good point on the unnaturally straight split between sky and sea. Kinda creepy... Black cavalier.png Zenihdrol Tribal top (blue).png 14:21, December 24, 2009 (UTC)
  • Weak Oppose- the altar looks good, but the fog horizon is an eye catcher and distracts the viwer from the actual water altar. Runecrafting-icon.png Stormsaw1 Talk Sign HighscoresRunecrafting-icon.png 19:39, December 26, 2009 (UTC)
  • Oppose - The angle of the current version is much better also per Stormsaw Swiz Talk Review Me 16:57, December 27, 2009 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Per Ssswizmig Makxtrl Talk 01:30, December 28, 2009 (UTC)
  • support - You know what? everybody is opposing, and I'll try to lighten this up a little. TROLL ME!!!! -- sig1.png Spam me w/ lolcatsPottery statuette detail.png Is <insert name here> awesome? I don't know, let me check... 04:10, December 28, 2009 (UTC)
    How is that a good reason to support? The only thing it does is make this image and this nomination look stupid. Ancient talisman.png Oil4 Talk 18:03, December 28, 2009 (UTC)
  • Oppose - It's good, but the other one's better. Ancient talisman.png Oil4 Talk 18:03, December 28, 2009 (UTC)
  • Closed - X mark.svg Nomination for replacement is unsuccessful. C.ChiamTalk 02:58, December 31, 2009 (UTC)



Count Draynor's Coffin

File:Count-draynor.png|250x250px|right

Count Draynor's coffin.png

Description: The entrance to Count Draynor's gloomy hall.
Reason: Simply put, it's spooky! I love the lighting in this picture, the coffin and the actual atmosphere

  • Support - As nominator. Death 4210 23:27, January 8, 2010 (UTC)
  • Comment - I've restarted the nomination and archived the old one, seeing as we already have an image of Count Draynor's Coffin, and this would be a nomination for replacement. C.ChiamTalk 07:37, January 12, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support as 'new' FIMG - I like the new image, but I don't think that it is better than the old one. I think both should be FIMGs. Ancient talisman.png Oil4 Talk 21:56, January 12, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - I really like the old one. The new hallway one is just not to the point, black edges make it look really lame :|. Astral rune.png Jhanely Soul rune.png02:20, January 13, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - The old one was better. No need to have 2 images of the same thing. Unicorn horn dust.png Evil Yanks talk 02:27, January 13, 2010 (UTC)
  • Notice of intent - Deadline for nomination extended by a week to 26 January 2010. C.ChiamTalk 07:59, January 19, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - It's ugly, too far away and off-center. The old one has a better angle and show a lot more details. Sorry, but no.--Yojeez 22:43, January 19, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - This one really sucks, the old one really got to the main point of the image. Small leap emote icon.png « Gloria » One-leg balance emote icon.png 15:15, January 20, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose-Like everyone else said, the old one is better. It shows more of the room. The new one just concentrates on the coffin. Dragon helm.pngSupergrunt8Dragon 2h sword old.png 23:12, January 20, 2010 (UTC)
  • Actually, the old one is the image that concentrates on the coffin. The new one is the one that shows more of the room. C.ChiamTalk 11:03, January 21, 2010 (UTC)
  • Second to that, I only featured the image *for* the room, NOT the coffin. The coffin is extra, and I don't see why we can't have both. The coffin might be detailed, alright I agree with you, but the room has the amazing carpet, the candles, wall textures, etc. ~ Death_4210
  • Comment - Yes but they are under the same name, Death, and people may choose what they wish. You are kind of bribing people to pick your image. "The coffin is extra, and I don't see why we can't have both. The coffin might be detailed, alright I agree with you, but the room has the amazing carpet, the candles, wall textures, etc." I mean no harm to start an argument. Small leap emote icon.png « Gloria » One-leg balance emote icon.png 15:03, January 21, 2010 (UTC)
    • How is that 'bribing'? Ancient talisman.png Oil4 Talk 14:42, January 22, 2010 (UTC)
    • Sorry, I should have used 'convincing', however if you read the quotes it's a little off :/. But I can put those away now >_o. Small leap emote icon.png « Gloria » One-leg balance emote icon.png 23:57, January 22, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - I don't like the centering, the black border, and the other image is just better looking. Air rune.png Tollerach hates SoF Fire rune.png 20:30, January 21, 2010 (UTC)
  • Closed - X mark.svg Nomination is unsuccessful. C.ChiamTalk 12:20, January 26, 2010 (UTC)



Dragon (Unstable Foundations)

[[File:Unstable Foundations dragon.png|250x250px|right|New image]]

Old image

Reason: It's larger and the edges are a bit smoother.

  • Support - As nominator. --Iiii I I I 17:25, January 15, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Too dark in the back, try to do 1 more try in this image ;) Heal Group icon.pngShadow guy15 TCEHeal Group icon.png 23:50, January 15, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - (I don't know why this is at the bottom of this post, if you can move it, please help >_<)Ahem, It looks much better, it doesn't matter if it's dark, that's what makes it looks mysterious... or at least to me O_o. I think it's much better. And the edges are smoother :], as said. Astral rune.png Jhanely Soul rune.png 17:25, January 16, 2010 (UTC)
  • No, my individual post was way at the bottom. Astral rune.png Jhanely Soul rune.png 03:49, January 17, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support- This one looks a lot better, though I do miss his tail. --Ring of kinship detail.png CaistlynTalk Contribs 14:53, January 18, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - The one for replacement is much better. Though it excludes some things, like 1 back leg, and tail, it still looks much better. Small leap emote icon.png « Gloria » One-leg balance emote icon.png 06:21, January 19, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - I really miss the tail and leg. It just makes it look... Different. Ancient talisman.png Oil4 Talk 22:00, January 19, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - A common tutorial dragon, not so great to be featured. Rune scimitar.png BAHJY1 talk Rune scimitar.png 17:04, January 20, 2010 (UTC)
  • This is not for featuring (Due to it already as) this for replacing Twig Talk 772kZGs.png 23:15, January 20, 2010 (UTC)
  • How is this dragon common? There is only one tutorial dragon. --Iiii I I I 15:00, January 22, 2010 (UTC)
  • Notice of intent - Deadline for nomination extended by a week to 29 January 2009. C.ChiamTalk 06:52, January 23, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - The older image is slightly more detailed, and has the tail as well. Construction-icon.png Matt is Me / Harmonising / Lvl 3 skils3 Talk Cooking cape (t).png 07:05, January 24, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - I prefer the other, as it is slightly brighter and has a tail... --
    Water Wave icon.png
    Captain Sciz
    TalkEditsHiscores File:Runecrafter hat.png|link=
    22:35, January 25, 2010 (UTC)
  • Closed - X mark.svg Nomination is unsuccessful. C.ChiamTalk 10:06, January 31, 2010 (UTC)



Beefy Bill

[[File:New Beefy Bill's wagon.png|250x250px|right|New Image for replacement]]

Old Image Nonimated

Reason: Looks better to me. I mean it has almost viewing the front and the right side of the wagon. :D

  • Support - as nominator |0ComeKillLah, Meh|Talk to me!| 09:12, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - I like when images are centered most of the time. The old one is way better, and isn't so dark.Bill looks better in the old image in my opinion. :| Small leap emote icon.png « Gloria » One-leg balance emote icon.png 04:35, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - The fog isn't as obvious and I like the slanted angle of the cart. Unicorn horn dust.png Evil Yanks talk 23:38, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
  • Comment - For whatever admin closes this if it is successful, the new image is already in the old images history. Because of this, it would probably be easier to revert File:Beefy Bill's wagon.png to the new image and delete [[:File:New Beefy Bill's wagon.png]] outright. Unicorn horn dust.png Evil Yanks talk 23:38, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose The new one is too dark and I don't like the angle. User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 18:47, February 16, 2010 (UTC)
Top is the new one. If you hover over the images it says which is which. Unicorn horn dust.png Evil Yanks talk 00:09, February 14, 2010 (UTC)
Thanks! I changed it.
  • Come on guys. Please... :(

|0ComeKillLah, Meh|Talk to me!| 02:14, February 16, 2010 (UTC)

Don't beg +_+ Astral rune.png Jhanely Soul rune.png 14:44, February 16, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose- Per Opposers. Astral rune.png Jhanely Soul rune.png 14:44, February 16, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose-- Bill's posture looks better in the old one. Runecrafting-icon.png Stormsaw1 Talk Sign HighscoresRunecrafting-icon.png 00:32, February 18, 2010 (UTC)
  • Closed - X mark.svg Nomination for replacement is unsuccessful. C.ChiamTalk 12:23, February 18, 2010 (UTC)



Ancient Cavern

[[File:Featuredimagecandidate ancientcavern.png|right|200px]] Original image: File:Ancient cavern hd.png

  • Support - As nominator. I think the old image is cluttered and small, as well as not being very detailed. The new image is bigger, more colorful, and generally more much more vibrant while still showing off the actual cavern itself. Cap and goggles.pngTEbuddy 17:28, March 7, 2010 (UTC)
  • Strong oppose - It is a huge image, there is a player, the waterfall behind the player looks like some glass pillars, the logs is cut off, the log looks like a big floating piece of excrement, the pond the log is in is polygonical, the stalagmites under player are triangular, and the polygon pond's waterfall is unnaturally straight. sig1.png Spam me w/ lolcatsPottery statuette detail.png Is <insert name here> awesome? I don't know, let me check... 17:36, March 7, 2010 (UTC)
Criticizing a picture in Runescape for being unnaturally straight or polygonal is like criticizing water for being wet. Those setbacks are because of the game engine, if you take a look at the old image it is plagued with them. Cap and goggles.pngTEbuddy 18:29, March 7, 2010 (UTC)
I am not criticizing the engine, I am criticizing the nomination to one of the best images of the game. I am pointing out why this shouldn't be a featured image, since there are better images. sig1.png Spam me w/ lolcatsPottery statuette detail.png Is <insert name here> awesome? I don't know, let me check... 20:06, March 7, 2010 (UTC)
Please clear this up for me. You are calling parts of the image too straight (like the water splash), which are generated by the game. If I cannot control those things, like the creator of the original image, then how can someone fix them? Every featured image has this problem. So I understand if you do not prefer the image, but using a reason that the game engine creates while at the same time ignoring the faults of the first image confuses me. Cap and goggles.pngTEbuddy 00:34, March 8, 2010 (UTC)
How about a different camera angle. Nephilim RetiredGuthix stole.png 19:07, March 8, 2010 (UTC)
  • Weak support - The old image is a bit messy due the fact the player in it fights (yes, Porp1, the previous image has two players XD), but the good thing is that it shows the higly dangerous monsters of the dungeon. And Porp1 is right, the things are cut-off pretty weird. If you could make a nice image without a player, with some monsters and a nice scenery like this one, I'll fully support you. ;)18:03, March 7, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - the ancient cavern is the most beautifull place on rs- however, the player ruins it- as kuradal did. Third age robe top.png 3rd age farcaster Third age druidic robe top.png 19:22, March 7, 2010 (UTC)
  • Weak support - The old image is better, as someone removed the player, and it was reverted due to the fact it was an Featured image. However, it shows of the cavern perfectly. The only think I'd criticise is the player, although there's not much of a problem. It enhances Runescape's beauty, the waterfall is gorgeous. [[Woodcutting cape.png]]Exsibilation]] Santa hat.png
  • Notice of intent - Deadline for nomination extended by a week to 21 March 2010. C.ChiamTalk 05:57, March 15, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - The light blues and greys on the left side don't go well with the dark blues and greys on the right side. Unicorn horn dust.png Evil Yanks talk 05:20, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
  • Neutral - The player ruined it. (The original image is much better.) bad_fetustalk 15:08, March 20, 2010 (UTC)
  • Closed - X mark.svg Nomination for replacement is unsuccessful. C.ChiamTalk 08:11, March 21, 2010 (UTC)



Fishing Guild

File:Fishing_guild(2).Png|250x250px|right

Image deleted because it was unused in the mainspace. C.ChiamTalk 10:50, March 31, 2010 (UTC)

Description: Players fishing at the Fishing Guild.
Reason:Graphic Update, i got the exactly the same angle as old one, look nicer with a new one
Current image: File:Fishing guild.png + Nomination

  • Support as a Nominator - Project Myface Parsonsda Talk | Sign Here | Project Myface Project Myface 19:48, March 24, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - This image isn't used on the Mainspace. In addition to that, it doesn't contain the same colours and activeness of the other one. --
    Water Wave icon.png
    Captain Sciz
    TalkEditsHiscores File:Runecrafter hat.png|link=
    19:55, March 24, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - What is there to feature? Seems like an overall boring image with some nasty fog up top. Cap and goggles.pngTEbuddy 08:25, March 25, 2010 (UTC)
  • Weak Oppose - I kinda like the image, but the fog at the top ruins it. bad_fetustalk 15:40, March 25, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Why shouldn't historical images be featured? Btw, I don't think this is a valid nomination because the image is not used in an article. Anyway, the old one's better because it shows what people do while fishing; not only fishing, but also walking their ibis and being poisoned, for example. This is pretty dull and uninteresting. And then the fog... Sorry, but the only thing I like in the image is the water, plus the fishing spots. User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 16:30, March 25, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Old image was much brighter, the colours really stood out. The nominated photo is lacking that aspect of the old photo. Unicorn horn dust.png Evil Yanks talk 04:37, March 27, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - The old image is very lively, which makes it great. This one just isn't that lively. Ancient talisman.png Oil4 Talk 13:30, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
  • Closed - X mark.svg Nomination for replacement is unsuccessful. C.ChiamTalk 10:50, March 31, 2010 (UTC)



Tormented Demon

[[File:Torm Demon.PNG|right|250x250px|New image]] Has been deleted. Replaces current FIMG file. C.ChiamTalk 01:45, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Old image

Description: An incredibly powerful tortured demon magically bound to Lucien.
Reason: Not very much detailed, fire with no transparency, small image. The new image is above the old one.
Original nomination: RuneScape:Featured_images/archive3#Tormented_Demon

  • Support - As nominator. Felipebrs 00:39, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
  • Comment - In the history of the file has a better image uploaded by me. Felipebrs 00:46, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
  • Comment - If you want to replace the current Tormented demon image with yours, you can start a nomination for replacement instead of just delisting it. --Iiii I I I 00:48, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
  • Comment - Oh, how? Im new at here... Felipebrs 00:55, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
  • Comment - Same as you did here - nominate this for replacement under the corresponding heading, but remember to remove the <!-- --> ad the edges. Make sure to upload your new suggested image as a seperate file and nominate it. That's the basic work. User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 05:56, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
And uhm... Í could to it for you, on behalf of you. So that the nominator's vote is actually your vote and I can still support/oppose as myself, if that's OK. Is it aloud, actually? User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 13:10, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
  • Comment - Went ahead and moved it under the correct heading. C.ChiamTalk 13:39, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
Yah, well, the new image must be uploaded, the original nomination isn't needed and the reason must be adjusted. Now, if you... Lol User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 15:05, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
  • Comment - Ty guys, look at: RuneScape:Featured_images/archive-replacement#Tormented_Demon Felipebrs 16:55, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
  • Comment - Red link. Ok, I placed old and new file in this nomination. Now we can vote! User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 17:06, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Yours is way better. bad_fetustalk 16:47, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - The new image is bigger, brighter, has a much better angle and the fire look a lot better. I'd nominate it if I'd have seen it! Great image. User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 17:06, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Per Fswe. --Ring of kinship detail.png CaistlynTalk Contribs 19:45, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Much more detail. --Iiii I I I 19:59, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Per all. --Coolnesse 20:07, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
  • Yesh! (Support) - Per all.  Ranged-icon.png Zap0i TalkRune scimitar.png  20:48, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
  • Super Duper Support - I love the light colors! Full Slayer Helmet! Evil1888 Talk A's L Dragon Platebody! 22:59, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
  • Strong Support - The image is nice! Lacks a desciption though.Recent uploads SpineTalkGuest book 00:33, May 28, 2010 (UTC)
  • Strong support - Very nice image LordDarkPhantom 13:39, May 29, 2010 (UTC)
  • Strong Support - Better colors, clearer, more detailed, overall a way better image. Mining cape.png The Last Pun Talk Aberrant Spectre Champion.png 14:27, May 29, 2010 (UTC)
  • Strong Support - Looks way better, per all. HaloTalk 15:43, May 29, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Love them vibrant colors ;). Dairy cow chathead.pngCamianaTalk Bucket detail.png 03:59, May 30, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - It kinda looks like it missed the graphics update, and I don't really like how it looks. Sorry :( ajr 21:19, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
  • Closed - Yes check.svg Nomination for replacement is successful. C.ChiamTalk 01:41, June 3, 2010 (UTC)


Enchanted Valley

Enchanted valley.png
EnchValleyWF.png

Description: The mysterious valley of the centaurs.
Reason: This image is shows more of the valley and is more interesting than just a waterfall.

  • Support - As nominator. Ring of kinship detail.png CaistlynTalk Contribs 14:56, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Per Camoninja12. And... My image! :) Felipebrs 15:12, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - I like the waterfall more than two centaurs, a wood dryad, a stag, a rock and some trees. Of course, they do look great. Perhaps we could feature both? User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 16:43, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
  • Extremely strong oppose - Why the hell would I support two ugly centaurs replacing an awesome waterfall image? bad_fetustalk 18:07, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
Two ugly centaurs and a stag. XD User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 18:27, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
Two ugly centaurs and an ugly stag. bad_fetustalk 19:28, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
rofl User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 04:56, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose replacement, Support new FIMG - <--- Basically, Don't replace what isn't broken, instead, replicate it. Make them both FIMGs. I love them both =) RSN: Warthog Rhys Talk Completionist's cape... Coming soon. 18:42, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
Changed to strong oppose for both - Im sorry, but the new image that includes the centaurs is horrible, the fog is horrific and just totally puts the nails in the coffin for me, sorry RSN: Warthog Rhys Talk Completionist's cape... Coming soon. 07:10, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Looks like someone slapped the centaur on the ass and made him bleed. --Iiii I I I 19:40, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
I lol'd. bad_fetustalk 19:40, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
Ditto Coelacanth0794 00:23, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
Idem ^_^ Lol User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 05:53, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose replacement, Support new FIMG - Per Gradius, lmao at the smelly one.  Ranged-icon.png Zap0i TalkRune scimitar.png  23:26, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
  • Strong Support - The new Image represents alot more then the old one, and the waterfall is good image but it is mostly unrelated to the article and so should be replaced as it does not conform to the FIMG ideals, must make a statement about the article and just a waterfall does not do that Fury 133 Talk New Zealand serv.svg 02:40, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
Changed to Oppose - The image is no longer the same and is just worse then the Waterfall and so I am changing my vote Fury 133 Talk New Zealand serv.svg 04:16, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - You've sawed off the waterfall and the white thing *rabbit* on the right is showing it's arse. -- BUKKITZ WEEL SMITE YOU!!!Murd3rlogistTalk Contribs Sign here 04:02, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - There are two ugly centaurs and a beautiful watefall? What's the point.Quest point cape.png Shrodder1 Quest point cape.png 08:03, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - For a moment, I thought you wanted to replace the ugly green picture with the beautiful waterfall. Farming cape (t).png Lil cloud 9 Talk 20:25, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose replacement, Support new FIMG - Per above. HaloTalk 00:10, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Per the cloud monster Coelacanth0794 16:31, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
  • Comment - Hm, the image seems to have changed. Farming cape (t).png Lil cloud 9 Talk 05:50, June 7, 2010 (UTC)
Hm, I wonder why that happened. --Ring of kinship detail.png CaistlynTalk Contribs 18:39, June 7, 2010 (UTC)
  • Comment - Image fixed. --Ring of kinship detail.png CaistlynTalk Contribs 13:52, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
  • Closed X mark.svg Replacement unsuccessful. A new nomination must be done for a different image. VZBTKVLBucket detail.pngrwojy 11:31, June 10, 2010 (UTC)



Avatar of Destruction

Current image
Avatar_of_Destructioncompressed.png

Reason: Better colours

  • Support - As nominator. LordDarkPhantom 15:19, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - They barely have any difference anyways. bad_fetustalk 15:21, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
Just slight colour difference. LordDarkPhantom 16:01, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Which one is AA lol? --Coolnesse 16:38, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
  • Really doesn't care - I don't see the slightest difference. User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 18:42, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - the colors weren't inherently changed, just enhanced a bit. kitty.pngPsycho Robot talkSilver bar.png 18:46, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

Support - Even though there's barely any difference. HaloTalk 18:47, July 31, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - Ummm...shouldn't the file just be reuploaded? I don't believe this needs a nomination for replacement? (Excuse me if I'm wrong.) HaloTalk 17:16, August 1, 2010 (UTC)

Comment - Aggred... Felipe B Rs contribs talk 19:10, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
The rules are kind of unclear at the moment. Uploading a new version of a featured image isn't allowed unless its nominated for replacement, however I don't think whoever made that rule intended it to be applied in this situation. kitty.pngPsycho Robot talkSilver bar.png 19:12, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
I wouldn't mind just uploading it, but I don't want any trobble. LordDarkPhantom 08:53, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - It does have a little bit better colours. Hunter cape (t).png Sentra246Blue hallowe'en mask.png 09:03, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
  • Neutral - I feel like I'm looking at one of those pictures where it says to spot the difference between the 2, but can't really find a difference. O_o Farming cape (t).png Lil cloud 9 Talk 11:21, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Per all.  Ranged-icon.png Zap0i TalkRune scimitar.png  16:27, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Slight improvement. It is most likely not going to last long, as i already have a AA'd and bigger image... JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 04:06, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
  • Closed - Yes check.svg Nomination for replacement is successful. C.ChiamTalk 07:59, August 7, 2010 (UTC)



Al Kharid Oasis

[[File:Oasis.png|thumb|right|261px|New image]] Image was not used in the mainspace

Current image

Reason: Centered, no camel in the front, no fog in the background, better colors(previous one was grey-ish)

  • Support - As nom. JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 01:55, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - The previous image followed the rule of thirds (off center is good). The camel gives it a much better sense of place. Riblet15 03:42, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
Commment - The new image also got some rule of thirds things.[2] And i know the thirds aren't exact thirds, but they aren't at the current image either[3] JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 12:39, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
You really don't need to respond to every single thing I say, but more accurate lines are [4] and [5]. The general rule of thirds is to try and keep the subject (in the original, the camel/things off to the left, in the new one...uh, the center lake?) outside of the center box, not necessarily along the lines. Riblet15 18:26, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - The new image is quite good, but it has some cut-off things to the right, which the original one doesn't have. Also....... CAMELS FTW! User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 06:03, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
  • Neutral - They are both terrible. bad_fetustalk 08:01, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Per all. 222 talk 08:24, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Per nom. --Coolnesse 11:28, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - per Fswe and Riblet LordDarkPhantom 13:46, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
Woohoo, I'm "perred"! XD User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 13:50, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
  • Comment Did you read the thing i answered below riblet's post? and to Fswe1: gefeliciteerd Smile. JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 14:59, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
Bedankt, lol. User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 15:20, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Per Riblet. HaloTalk 17:57, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Per Fswe.  Ranged-icon.png Zap0i TalkRune scimitar.png  20:58, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Per Riblet Farming cape (t).png Lil cloud 9 Talk 23:45, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - The new one looks nice without the white sky in the background. ajr 03:26, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
  • Closed - Nomination for replacement is unsuccessful. C.ChiamTalk 13:04, August 14, 2010 (UTC)



Avatar of Destruction

Current image

Reason: 4x bigger and Anti Aliasing, less pixelated, more lighting detail, and the eyes have more realistic colors.

  • Strong support - As nom. JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 13:13, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
  • Comment - Can someone resize the suggested image please? JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 13:13, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
  • Strong support - Spectacular image, bravo! I just love the mouth of the upper face, like it's some black hole made of lava, w00t! =D User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 15:22, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
  • Extreme strong support - Per nom. Everything of the new image is better than the old image(4X bigger: 2x wider and 2x taller). The old image even has some background in his neck, Lol Melee JudytjetalkMyface 19:55, August 7, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - per nom LordDarkPhantom 09:51, August 8, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Per above. bad_fetustalk 12:05, August 8, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - I would not have supported the original image to featured with the modern quality of images, but the suggested version is very detailed. Riblet15 01:55, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Per above. HaloTalk 20:42, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Now with more beastliness! Quest point cape.pngLil Diriz 77 Talk Summoning-icon.png 04:45, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Per nom. Much nicer across the board. I think the angle could be better, but still very good. Quest MasterTexan H B K Quest Master 13:20, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Maybe it's just me, but am I the only one who notices the unsightly "tooth" in the mouth of the Avatar? C.ChiamTalk 07:34, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
How can such a small thing make you oppose, while the detail, size and much more is so much better? Also, if the angle is changed a bit, the hole under his right arm(left for viewers) would also disappear, which also puts more depth in it. Maybe some pro photoshopper can remove it or something(if thats allowed for FIMGs JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 19:58, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Sure, why not. Farming cape (t).png Lil cloud 9 Talk 07:36, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Per all. Also, Chiam I noticed the "tooth" as well. 222 talk 09:07, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - The tooth may be unsightly, but the detail trumps the current version. Magic-icon.pngStelercusIlluminated Book of Balance.png 14:54, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - This image is much more detailed and clearer, though I must agree with others on the "tooth". Mining cape.png The Last Pun Talk Aberrant Spectre Champion.png 02:34, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
  • Comment - I have tried taking another shot of the avatar without the "tooth", but that's impossible, as if the tooth is not in the image, his left eye is not on it, and i can tell ya that it doesn't make the image better. I edited the "tooth" out from the current nominated version, and smoothened the edges, cleaned up some AA artefacts, and finally i have trans'd the background next to his right leg. I'm sorry to nominate another destruct avatar for replacement, but i will only do that because of the comments on the tooth(so i also cleaned it up while i was editing it anyway). (actually i lol'd when i saw i missed trans too, just like the prev. version had a spike in his neck. Lol. JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 13:15, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
  • Comment to mods - Pleaseplzplzplz don't upload the image, as i really would like to have the credits for my work, and upload it myself. I'll upload it as soon as i wake up 2moro, and the nom was succesful. JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 13:15, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
Can I ask you what difference that makes? bad_fetustalk 06:44, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
Read RS:OWN. You don't have ownership over "your" file. ʞooɔ 06:47, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
  • Closed - Yes check.svg Nomination for replacement is successful. C.ChiamTalk 07:13, August 14, 2010 (UTC)

K'ril Tsutsaroth (2)

New image
Current image

Reason: Better colours, both legs visible, fixed wing transparency and sigly rotated.

  • Support - As nominator. Felipe B Rs contribs talk 18:56, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Better angle {{Assinaturas/dead evil84}} 21:03, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Per nominator. Recent uploads SpineTalkGuest book 19:18, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - I like the colors. HaloTalk 19:27, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
  • Weak(per Texan) Support - Per nom. Maybe the wings need smooth trans, as it still looks like snow trough it. (I could do that) JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 19:48, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Vivid OMG!!! I like it much better than the old one. Quest point cape.pngLil Diriz 77 Talk Summoning-icon.png 04:48, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
  • Weak Support - The colors are much better, although the angle is worse. bad_fetustalk 09:05, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Defiantly a better picture.Hunter cape (t).png Sentra246Blue hallowe'en mask.png 10:45, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - per nom LordDarkPhantom 10:50, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support- Better transparency and better angle. Quest point cape.png Shrodder1 Quest point cape.png 13:11, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
  • Weak Oppose - If you showed me both images, I'm not sure I'd know which one's supposed to be the improved version (except for the leg positions). Angle's only gotten worse, and the more transparent wing gives a wider contrast from the body and head of the monster. Quest MasterTexan H B K Quest Master 13:27, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
I agree the angle has become a bit worse, as the right(for viewers) weapon is only one line. Still the feet are better. Changed opinion from Support to Weak support. JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 19:31, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
Seems like I'm the only one opposed to it, but it doesn't even seem like it's any better, much less warranting a replacement. In this case, it seems like the wing transparency actually devalues the image as it clashes with the rest of the monster. In the older image the wing is similar in color to the rest of it. As you mention, you can't even see his right weapon. Quest MasterTexan H B K Quest Master 09:39, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - A much better angle, but the colours are too bright. A pity of the leftern scimitar, but at least the tail doesn't stick through the wing. -.- User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 06:52, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - You can see more of the left side now. Farming cape (t).png Lil cloud 9 Talk 07:38, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Better angle. Magic-icon.pngStelercusIlluminated Book of Balance.png 14:56, August 12, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Brighter, better angle, and the wing transparency is much better. Mining cape.png The Last Pun Talk Aberrant Spectre Champion.png 02:38, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - tbh, new one is terrible. --Coolnesse 08:04, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Just looks a lot better overall. Knuckleball talk Fishing 04:37, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Per knuckleball^^^ Coelacanth0794 17:51, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - The original image is a bit larger. --LiquidTalk 15:22, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
  • Closed - Yes check.svg Nomination for replacement is successful. --LiquidTalk 15:22, August 17, 2010 (UTC)



Altar of Zaros

Reason: Bigger, so more detail, less pixelated(most likely prev one was 2XAA, and this one is 4XAA), and it is easier to see Zaros owns now.

Current version

[[File:Zaros altar.png|thumb|New version]]

Lolz at 13:37 time above ^ JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 15:26, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Image is slightly brighter Recent uploads SpineTalkGuest book 16:20, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
  • Weak support - Brighter. Hunter cape (t).png Sentra246Blue hallowe'en mask.png 01:52, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
    • Comment - Did you notice it is 4x bigger, and 2x more Anti Aliasing? that results in bout 8x more detail in the image... JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 03:38, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
      • You putting way too much in store for size. Remember that it is going to be resized and, as it is AA, it dpes does not make mind blowing difference. LordDarkPhantom 06:50, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
        • I didn't notice it because the size doesn't really mater as it won't be full size anyway. Hunter cape (t).png Sentra246Blue hallowe'en mask.png 07:11, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
          • The size actually does matter, as when you click to enlarge, you want it to... enlarge, not stay the same size(which is currently the case for the image). If the image is bigger AND has AA, it also has more detail when enlarged. That does also count, although it is gonna be resized on the main page. JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 15:27, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
            • You misunderstand - I make not making comparisons, I am just saying that making it 4x larger does not make it 4x better. When you click on it to make it larger, it only goes large enough to fit the page size and for me this image is even beyond that. It really does NOT need to be THAT large so that is my reason for my comment. IMO, it should be 2x the size it is in the article and not much more; infact, for me, it is even more annoying to have to wait ages for an image larger than you want to view it. LordDarkPhantom 17:43, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Per above. HaloTalk 04:29, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Better angle (Halo its not a bullet point) Twig Talk 772kZGs.png 05:51, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
    • How 'bout you just leave my crap alone? HaloTalk 05:58, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Per all. (Don't edit Halo's work) --Coolnesse 07:53, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
    • Don't edit Halo's userpage under normal circumstances. Re-read the policy before quoting it. C.ChiamTalk 08:21, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Chicken wings. User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 11:38, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - The angle is slightly worse though. bad_fetustalk 13:13, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Is better. Quest point cape.pngLil Diriz 77 Talk Summoning-icon.png 07:03, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
  • Strong support - Per all =D. Great image  Ranged-icon.png Zap0i TalkRune scimitar.png  02:24, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
  • Closed - Yes check.svg Nomination for replacement is successful. C.ChiamTalk 05:28, August 21, 2010 (UTC)



Avatar of Destruction

Current image


Reason: Forgot some background between his legs, filled up the notorious "tooth", removed some AA artefacts, smoothened a bit.


  • Support - As nom. 15:38, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
I know, there is the destruct avatar again, but you were so "annoyed" by the tooth, i decided to get rid of it, and then also some other bad things too. JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 15:38, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - per nom LordDarkPhantom 15:50, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Per nom. The accursed tooth is gone! Mining cape.png The Last Pun Talk Aberrant Spectre Champion.png 20:03, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Do we really need another one, considering the past one just got done and this is only a minor change. HaloTalk 04:36, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Agreeing with Halo, but if you went through the effort to do it again, no reason to not accept this I suppose? :s Quest MasterTexan H B K Quest Master 10:49, August 15, 2010 (UTC)

Reconsidered per Chess

  • Neutral - I'll support if you bring the tooth back. It looks so cool! User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 11:30, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
So that means support for the edges and removed background, oppose for the cleaned tooth? JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 00:56, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
  • Strong Oppose - Wait, so the original image actually had the tooth, and you removed it by means of editing? That makes it fan art. bad_fetustalk 13:00, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
I did edit it out, but the tooth is a bad thing about the image, and it is impossible to have both a good angle and not the "tooth", so i edited it out. I said "Maybe some pro photoshopper can remove it or something" the prev nomination, and nobody protested, so that's why i did it. Btw, it also has no AA artefacts and no background between his legs. Maybe you could still support for that, if you think it is fan art. I still think this is no fan art as only a VERY small part of it has been edited away, as it is ugly.(File:Ghost (monster).png is also fan art then, as the trans wasn't in it at the time of the screenshot. it was added later.) And can't you allow it for one time, because you don't see anything about it if you don't know it is edited. JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 16:43, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
File:Ghost (monster).png is not fan art, because it looks exactly the same with the in-game image. However, this image, is different from the way it should be. Just be bold and fix the transparency, without removing the tooth. Also, as far as I can remember, altering images is against the rules. bad_fetustalk 08:38, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - The previous just won a nomination. The appliance of removing something from it shouldn't be done in my opinion. I don't see anything wrong with leaving the "unsightly" tooth there. Adding transparency is allowing the main article in the image to be focused on, this tooth wasn't something that needed to be taken away. I do not oppose because I would think it could be fan art, but because of what has been stated and what purpose does it truthfully serves. I also think that the tooth made him more believable than his more "gummy" (he doesn't bite, he'll just gum you to death) grin in aforementioned file. On another note, the Avatar appears to have lost some colour in the edit. Ryan PM 05:14, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
Did you just say it is allowed to remove background, and smoothen edges with FIMGS? JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 13:39, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
If one is aiming to have an image of Monster X, then the background around Monster X must be removed. The background around Monster X is not Monster X, and thus, is irrelevant to the image. Smoothing images' edges is fine because it does not remove relevant content from the image, it only make the edges look nicer than usual jagged pixels. Removing a whole tooth from a monster's mouth gives the monster a false image, something it is not. Quest point cape.pngLil Diriz 77 Talk Summoning-icon.png 18:13, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
Then i've now already uploaded the no background, smooth edge version, with tooth, and there should be consensus about removing the tooth. JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 07:31, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Without the tooth, the mouth looks odd. RuneScape imagery should not be altered to what it isn't in-game. The tooth belongs. Quest point cape.pngLil Diriz 77 Talk Summoning-icon.png 07:22, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
  • Comment - This replacement should be redone because the voters were voting for smooth edges and fixed trans, and not just the tooth. This is why you shouldn't upload halfway during a nomination. LordDarkPhantom 17:46, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
The image was not uploading correctly, and then i thought of that too, so didn't re-upload to fix it. If it did upload correctly for you, please revert for now, so the discussion doesn't have to be started over Again JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 00:56, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
Why should I do this when you have nominated it, and then you uploaded during a nomination? Whenever I see a nom I always zoom in to see the image and it is updated correctly when you see that. The voters near the top don't even know that the ONLY thing they are voting for is the tooth since you went ahead and did all the other things such as: "Forgot some background between his legs, filled up the notorious "tooth", removed some AA artefacts, smoothened a bit." This should make them re-vote as there vote no longer counts since they though they were voting for more changes. I have two suggestions: restart the nomination or put <del> over the votes cast BEFORE you uploaded the changes, stating a reason, and ask the voters to re-vote.
This is not about the future voters as you seem to think it is, but the voters who voted before the change. LordDarkPhantom 07:04, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
I reverted it, so this discussion doesn't have to be started over again... JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 14:25, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
  • Strong oppose - Per Chess. --Coolnesse 03:11, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
  • Slight support - Slight improvement although it shouldn't be edited to remove a part of monster that should be there or has not been glitched. If there was a weird gap/transparent part of the head (yes I have seen this before) then filling it doesn't seem wrong. LordDarkPhantom 07:04, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
You mean images like: [1], [2], [3]? JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 14:25, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
  • Strong oppose - Per chess. 222 talk 07:16, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
  • Neutral - Per Chess, you made some improvements, but the tooth is part of the monster and should be kept. Mining cape.png The Last Pun Talk Aberrant Spectre Champion.png 15:12, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
  • Closed - X mark.svg Nomination is unsuccessful. C.ChiamTalk 05:44, August 21, 2010 (UTC)

Al Kharid

Current image.

Reason: Slightly more vivid, deserty colours

Image can be found here. Open both of them full size in a new tab.


  • Support - As nominator. LordDarkPhantom 13:31, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
  • Strong Support - Much more vivid colors. HaloTalk 13:34, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Looks nice, but I have to ask, did you simply change up the colouring of the current image? =\ It seems so, they look almost exactly the same. Quest point cape.pngLil Diriz 77 Talk Summoning-icon.png 18:10, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
Yes, that's what I did. LordDarkPhantom 13:48, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Meh. bad_fetustalk 08:53, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Per all. --Coolnesse 03:08, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Per Chess =D 222 talk 10:06, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - How is a desert vivid? User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 10:53, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
Are you aware that this is a replacement nomination? >_< bad_fetustalk 12:37, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
  • Closed - X mark.svg The replacement image does not meet the requirements to be a featured image. It is not used in mainspace, nor is it uploaded onto the wiki. --LiquidTalk 01:15, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
    • Yes check.svg Nomination successful, the replacement does not need to be on wiki yet. Correction on behalf of Luquidhelm.
      LordDarkPhantom 13:47, August 24, 2010 (UTC)


Stone circle

Current version

Reason: Better angle, no player, not cut off
Image: [6]

  • Support - As nominator. LordDarkPhantom 13:54, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose 1 - Player has been replaced by impling. Take shots again plz without the impling. As this is a FIMG, and it is about taverley, there shouldn't be such thing ruining the image. I agree the angle has improved. -Strong oppose 2: Impling too, and angle is worse than #1.- Comment: I think the pic should be taken from the same height as #1, but from the southwest. The herbcape guy should also face the camera, as he is the leader. JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 15:16, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
Try to remember that this is replacement: if this version is better than the current version, it should be replaced. I shall make some adjustments after this is over since I have already started the nomination. LordDarkPhantom 15:19, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
Also, I think that the impling adds to the natural feel of the place, but next time I'll remove that as well. LordDarkPhantom 15:21, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
What did i say wrong? I just said i think the angle has improved, but could be improved a bit more,(actually, forget about that shot from the s-w, this is best) and that the impling should be removed. That's all. Until then i think the previous version is better, because humen look more like druids than implings. The player somewhat blends in the crowd of druids, and the impling draws all attention. JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 15:45, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
Fair comments, sorry I just thought you had made a mix up LordDarkPhantom 15:50, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
  • Neutral - On both. They are better than the previous images, but I would like to see the impling go if possible. HaloTalk 04:32, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
  • Comment - LordDarkPhantom, both images are of the same subject. Please select one of them as the nominated replacement image, thanks. C.ChiamTalk 08:11, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
    • Well both of them were taken from different angles since I didn't know which one to take. I'll remove one of them however. Thanks, LordDarkPhantom 09:43, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - I'm pro-impling in this case, I really like the trees slowly vanishing aswell. And the implying doesn't draw anywhere as much attention as the player. Quest MasterTexan H B K Quest Master 10:53, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - I don't like it. Horrible AA artefacts, fog, bad angle and everyone's backs. Impling is cute though. ^^ User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 11:41, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
Wheres the AA artefacts? AA artefacts are little bits of background staying in the image after having trans added, because of the AA. Examples: [7][8]. JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 21:20, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
  • Strong Support - The angle is way better. bad_fetustalk 13:14, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Much better than the current image =D! Per all. Quest point cape.pngLil Diriz 77 Talk Summoning-icon.png 07:17, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
  • Neutral - This image has better detail and angle, but a bit in the front could be chopped off and there is fog in the background. --Coolnesse 03:04, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
  • Notice of intent - Deadline of nomination extended by a week to 28 August 2010. C.ChiamTalk 05:35, August 21, 2010 (UTC)
  • Slight support - Per all, but the impling is annoying. 222 talk 06:24, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
  • Weak support - Per Brains. Matt (t) 06:29, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
  • Comment - You know, we could just remove that impling... --Aburnett(Talk) 01:29, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
No we can't. Then it wouldn't be an original image anymore, and no longer eligible to be featured as FIMG. --LiquidTalk 01:34, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
Rofl, you forgot to remove its shadow. bad_fetustalk 10:00, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - One word 'FOG' Fury 133 Talk New Zealand serv.svg 06:16, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Much better angle, and I like that you can't see the nearby wall. Sir Punchula 02:33, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Per fury. --LiquidTalk 23:11, August 27, 2010 (UTC)
  • Closed - X mark.svg No consensus. --LiquidTalk 23:11, August 27, 2010 (UTC)

Aviansie

Aviansie.png

http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100828111135/sharephoto/images/thumb/6/6d/Aviansies.png/245px-Aviansies.png

Reason: Accurate colours, better angle/transparency.

Replacement image

  • Support - As nominator. LordDarkPhantom 11:26, August 28, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Slightly better angle. Hunter cape (t).png Sentra246Blue hallowe'en mask.png 11:31, August 28, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support- Better colours Because I'm a Master. Dead evil84 Talk[Myface]Because I like mysteries. 12:36, August 28, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support- Per all. Felipe B Rs contribs talk 13:01, August 28, 2010 (UTC)
  • Comment - What is the original image? sig1.png Spam me w/ lolcatsPottery statuette detail.png Is <insert name here> awesome? I don't know, let me check... 13:14, August 28, 2010 (UTC)
    • The current image is on the right and I have provided a link to the replacement image above. LordDarkPhantom 17:42, August 28, 2010 (UTC)
  • Weakish oppose - In my opinion, the current one's colours are better, and it is prettier. (compare the heads) I agree on the angle though. User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 14:33, August 28, 2010 (UTC)
    • I agree that the colours are worse, however they are accurate and display what the monster actually is ingame and I think it should remain like that. I mean look at the great difference in colour; greyish to dark green. LordDarkPhantom 17:42, August 28, 2010 (UTC)
      • Hm, yes, but I think the greenish colours are better. And the current image has a lot more detail. The wings look like wings, but "your" wings have basically the same colour, with no indications of feathers and stuff. Oops, I saw it in the dark. >.< User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 08:06, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
  • Neutral - Neither of them look all that appealing to me. HaloTalk 17:51, August 28, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Woot --Coolnesse 17:51, August 28, 2010 (UTC)
  • Strongly Oppose - the photo looks quite sharp and colors are not appealing at all. Wings on the beast look 2-Dimentional. Kirbsee 20:54, August 28, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Better colors. And the original is the one you see there, look at the replacement image link. ~MuzTalk 13:54, August 28, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Per Kirbsee.  Ranged-icon.png Zap0i TalkRune scimitar.png  02:55, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Although I'll probably nominate it for delisting after this ends since it looks terrible now. However, we should have the correct version of the image. bad_fetustalk 14:13, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
  • Slight oppose - They're both ugly. But the current one is less ugly. And it should be delisted as Chess said. 222 talk 07:07, September 4, 2010 (UTC)
  • Notice of intent - Nomination extended for a week to September 11, 2010. --LiquidTalk 15:20, September 4, 2010 (UTC)
  • Weak support - Although the new one looks remarkably better, I feel that the angle is awkward. sig1.png Spam me w/ lolcatsPottery statuette detail.png Is <insert name here> awesome? I don't know, let me check... 15:50, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Better colors. @porp: i agree, but doesn't the old one have an awkward angle too? JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 23:26, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
  • Closed - Yes check.svg Nomination for replacement is successful. --LiquidTalk 00:20, September 11, 2010 (UTC)

Blood Runs Deep

old

[[File:FremmyfleetsailsBRD.png|250x250px|right|New]]

Description:The Fremennik Boats sail to war, that battle will soon be over
Reason: Simple really, look at the feeling of the image, it looks so real, a epic shoot of the Fremennik going to War. i edited abit to remove the npc from the back, i just cant sum up how this feels, but ull understand what im saying when u look at the image. the old immage angle has less feeling, less water detail and to bright for feeling.

  • Support - As nominator. Project Myface Parsonsda Talk | Sign Here | Project Myface Project Myface 11:42, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
  • Comment - What about File:Fremennik_Invasion.png? Mark (talk) 12:03, September 6, 2010 (UTC) -I moved it, thanks --Project Myface Parsonsda Talk | Sign Here | Project Myface Project Myface 12:10, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
  • Delist old - They both failz. --Coolnesse 13:32, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
  • Comment - The new image is better, but neither are all that great. HaloTalk 14:33, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
  • Neutral - I love both images, but yours is a bit better as you explained why. However, it is smaller without AA. User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 15:11, September 6, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - The old image has a better angle, as well as better colors. The new one is a bit too dark. --LiquidTalk 23:51, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

Strong Oppose - New image is too dark, plus, you said that you edited it. There is no way I'm supporting having an edited image on the wiki, let alone making it a fimg. bad_fetustalk 17:48, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

  • Weak support, and Weak delist both - I like the angle, colors etc of the new one, but they don't really have the wow-factor FIMGs need. @ chess: This was removing the distracting bits of the image. We want the image to focus on the front boat and some less ugly other boats, not the foggy ones. This is just like adding transparency, but this is without transparency. This is allowed here(i think). JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 23:23, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
  • NOTE: This is a nomination for replacement, not delisting. Please only comment on the replacement. If anyone wants to delist this, he or she is free to start a nomination for delisting once this closes. --LiquidTalk 00:11, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
Normally you are able to choose to remove both images during the replacement nomination. --Coolnesse 02:01, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
  • Strong Oppose - The original image is in general more interesting. The newer one is unattractively smaller and darker, and instead of feeling like you're going to war with them it's like they've left you to drown with their backs turned in the middle of the ocean. Riblet15 02:09, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Very good point Riblet. 222 talk 11:13, September 10, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Per Riblet, though I like the new picture if in full size (thumbnails make your image look too dark).  Ranged-icon.png Zap0i TalkRune scimitar.png  03:27, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - The old picture has a better angle. |0ComeKillLah, Meh|Talk to me!| 09:42, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
  • Closed - X mark.svg Nomination is unsuccessful. ʞooɔ 00:36, September 14, 2010 (UTC)

Enchanted valley

current

[[File:Enchanted Valley Waterfall(temp).png|thumb|250x250px|right|new]]

Reason: straighter. The current version makes me feel a bit dizzy because of the angle.

  • Support - As nominator, in the category "cleaning up featured images". JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 17:49, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - First of all, the current angle is fine. It looks like it's a helicopter or other aerial view, which is quite nice and much better than the standing on the banks view in the new image. Second, the original image has more transparent water, which looks much better than the light blue opaque water in the new image. --LiquidTalk 18:04, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
Ye, i dunno whats going on with my water detail... i had it turned on(as you can see in the lake)... {{{Plz}}} JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 18:06, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
  • Strong oppose - Again, the water detail is much worse. Farming cape (t).png Lil cloud 9 Talk 18:26, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Per nom, and trees are better visible and it is brighter.Melee JudytjetalkMyface 19:17, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - The water looks like a sheet of paper stretched taut against the edge of a table.  Tien  23:01, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - The angle might be slightly better, but the waterfall just looks so much worse that it negates any other improvements. kitty.pngPsycho Robot talkSilver bar.png 23:07, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
  • Strong oppose - You want to replace a translucent waterfall with a pale blue sheet draped over a cliff? 222 talk 06:06, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - You can't see the transparency of the water in the new pic. Hunter cape (t).png Sentra246Blue hallowe'en mask.png 06:11, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
This request for closure is complete A user has requested closure for Featured images/archive-replacement. Request complete. The reason given was: Stopping this nomination and starting a new nomination with the water transparent would be more useful imo, as i know the final consensus already:Oppose.

JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 11:31, October 18, 2010 (UTC)

  • Neutral - (desalniettemin stem ik! - I vote nonetheless!) The angle is better, the water, well, guess yourself. User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 13:04, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Per 222.  Ranged-icon.png Zap0i TalkRune scimitar.png  14:37, October 18, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - Per reasons above. bad_fetustalk 13:42, October 19, 2010 (UTC)

  • Closed - X mark.svg Nominator withdrawal. ʞooɔ 20:31, October 19, 2010 (UTC)

Fountain of Heroes

current

[[File:Fountain of Heroes(temp).png|thumb|250x250px|right|new]]

Reason: No player, more glow. Also has something of "what is at the end of the path at the right-top corner?"

Oppose - Terrible angle, and this image is one of those rare images that having a player improves the image. bad_fetustalk 18:00, October 17, 2010 (UTC)

  • Oppose - The water's color in the new image looks worse. --LiquidTalk 18:02, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
  • Strong oppose - The water definitely doesn't look as crisp. Farming cape (t).png Lil cloud 9 Talk 18:22, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
  • support - per nom, and the glow makes it more mysticalMelee JudytjetalkMyface 19:48, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Did you stuff up your options or something? This image has crappy water like the new waterfall one. 222 talk 06:20, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Brighter and more glowing. Hunter cape (t).png Sentra246Blue hallowe'en mask.png 06:21, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
This request for closure is complete A user has requested closure for Featured images/archive-replacement. Request complete. The reason given was: Stopping this nomination and starting a new nomination with the water transparent would be more useful imo, as i know the final consensus already.

JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 11:24, October 18, 2010 (UTC)

Wut? you aren't supposed to have the water transparent, the point of image isn't to show the water. bad_fetustalk 16:10, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - (yet once again I vote!) Per Chess. The new image has terrible water detail and it's too small, in other words, it needs more background, aka, too much has been cut off. User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 13:09, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Per all of the opposers. The image improved in one aspect (no player), but in the other aspects, it got worse.  Ranged-icon.png Zap0i TalkRune scimitar.png  14:42, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
  • Closed- X mark.svg Nominator withdrawal. ʞooɔ 20:30, October 19, 2010 (UTC)

Falador Park

current

Reason: no fog, you can see hazelmere(poor guySniff) better, strcape guy is currently not very visible either, and Turael is better. The others are as good as before. Only improvements imo. edit: also does not have such a huge gap in the center

  • Support - As nominator, in the category "cleaning up featured images". JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 17:55, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - I don't like the bay window in the back. --LiquidTalk 18:10, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - It's really the same thing, but I don't like the backdrop as much. Farming cape (t).png Lil cloud 9 Talk 18:28, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Better water detail and shadows.Melee JudytjetalkMyface 19:28, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - The original image has better shadows in my opinion. It also possesses a more dream-like quality.  Tien  23:04, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
  • Neutral - I would support, but the window... 222 talk 06:17, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Sharper, clearer and more defined also a bit brighter, also i like the window. Hunter cape (t).png Sentra246Blue hallowe'en mask.png 06:19, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
  • Weak oppose - IMO, the only things you've improved are the water detail and the angle on Turael. User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 13:07, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
Are you saying "there are only improvements, but they are small so i oppose"? hmm, strange...{{{Plz}}} JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 14:04, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
No. I'm saying: "There are some small improvements, but the rest has remained the same or become worse." User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 07:24, October 20, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - The old image has an eerie feeling to it.  Ranged-icon.png Zap0i TalkRune scimitar.png  14:40, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
Isn't it supposed to honor the heroes instead of look spooky? JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 20:51, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
No, we aren't putting the image on the mainpage to honour the heroes. ~~

Oppose - Water looks much worse, and I hate the glass at the back. bad_fetustalk 13:40, October 19, 2010 (UTC)

  • Closed - X mark.svg Nomination is unsuccessful. --LiquidTalk 02:58, October 24, 2010 (UTC)

Enchanted valley

current

[[File:Enchanted Valley Waterfall(temp).png|thumb|250x250px|right|new]]

Reason: straighter. The current version makes me feel a bit dizzy because of the angle. Also has better water than previous nomination

  • Support - As nominator JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 20:39, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Same reason as last time minus the water detail reason. I think it's neat how the current image provides an aerial view. It's like you're looking down from a helicopter or something, instead of standing dully on the bank of the river. --LiquidTalk 23:11, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - The water in the current pic looks clearer and the new one has lines in the water. Hunter cape (t).png Sentra246Blue hallowe'en mask.png 05:43, October 20, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Per helm, but helicopters don't exist in RS, noob! 222 talk 05:46, October 20, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Per helm. bad_fetustalk 16:43, October 20, 2010 (UTC)
  • Weak support - The water still sucks, otherwise, it's improved. User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 13:46, October 21, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - per nom LordDarkPhantom 14:07, October 23, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - The ground looks more flat in a frontal view. Sorry, but I don't think a frontal view is going to make it.  Ranged-icon.png Zap0i TalkRune scimitar.png  23:47, October 23, 2010 (UTC)
    • Change to neutral - Neutral because of what I said before and the fog. Otherwise, I like the new image more.  Ranged-icon.png Zap0i TalkRune scimitar.png  23:57, October 23, 2010 (UTC)
"I like the new image more" huh? you are neutral, but still like the new image more? i really don't understand that... JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 14:53, October 25, 2010 (UTC)
He said "otherwise". If it wasn't for "what I said before and the fog", then he would like the image more. That's what I think, anyway LordDarkPhantom 14:57, October 25, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - The image is history itself. --クールネシトーク 12:00, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
  • Closed - X mark.svg Nomination for replacement is unsuccessful. C.ChiamTalk 07:02, October 26, 2010 (UTC)

Fountain of Heroes

current

[[File:Fountain of Heroes(temp).png|thumb|250x250px|right|new]]

Reason: No player, more glow. Also has something of "what is at the end of the path at the right-top corner?" . Also has better water than previous nomination

  • Support - As nominator JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 20:39, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - The new image doesn't frame the cavern very nicely. With the original, it's very clear that the fountain is in a small cavern. With the new image, three of the four sides are cut away, leaving the false impression that the fountain is in a very large cavern. --LiquidTalk 23:12, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Per Helm, also, this is one of the few images where a player actually improves the image. 222 talk 05:32, October 20, 2010 (UTC)
You stole what I said in the previous nomination :( bad_fetustalk 16:40, October 20, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - The fountain is on a bit of an angle. The first picture isn't great though. Hunter cape (t).png Sentra246Blue hallowe'en mask.png 05:45, October 20, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - Terrible angle. bad_fetustalk 16:40, October 20, 2010 (UTC)'

  • Oppose - Is that a miniature Corporeal Beast coming from the top right corner??? O_o Otherwise, per Liquidargon. User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 13:48, October 21, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Get some dynamic lighting and change angle and it would be perfect (also make sure you aren't in the way like the "current" is. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ikin (talk).
  • Oppose - per Helm LordDarkPhantom 14:07, October 23, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Per all.  Ranged-icon.png Zap0i TalkRune scimitar.png  23:55, October 23, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Per all. --クールネシトーク 12:04, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
  • Closed - X mark.svg Nomination for replacement is unsuccessful. C.ChiamTalk 07:04, October 26, 2010 (UTC)

Grim Reaper

current
new

Reason: Newer, nice blade, nice bone colour (he should but on a bit of weight) overall, more colourful...well black....and brighter. :)

  • Support - As nominator --Project Myface Parsonsda Talk | Sign Here | Project Myface Project Myface 18:04, October 20, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - The robes look much better in the old version. The new version's robes doesn't look remotely interesting. --LiquidTalk 22:05, October 20, 2010 (UTC)
  • Slight oppose - Current img has better angle. LordDarkPhantom 22:33, October 20, 2010 (UTC)
  • Weak oppose - I must admit it is larger, so better, but the previous one has more dead-ish colors. The fact the suggested one is brighter only reduces impressiveness imo. JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 23:00, October 20, 2010 (UTC)
  • Neutral - The new Grim looks cooler, except for the hood. Oh, and darken the new image up! It's too blue! User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 13:44, October 21, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - If its new it HAS TO be updated, and the angle isn't bad at all ScionCrush 22:35, October 21, 2010 (UTC)
No, it doesn't... Obsolete images could look better than updated images. User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 13:14, October 22, 2010 (UTC)
And it is not obsolete. The grim reaper is still with his death rune in his office, but has changed his dress and wep for the event. JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 13:51, October 23, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - Per helm bad_fetustalk 13:21, October 22, 2010 (UTC)

  • Oppose - Looks like he's going to slide off his chair.  Ranged-icon.png Zap0i TalkRune scimitar.png  23:40, October 23, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Per all. --クールネシトーク 12:00, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
  • Closed - X mark.svg Nomination is unsuccessful. --LiquidTalk 22:05, October 27, 2010 (UTC)

Brimhaven Dungeon

Brimhaven dungeon entrance.png

Reason: Correct lighting, no player.

Replacement: [9]

And per paleness of current image JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 16:06, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
Or Delist, as it is not a very fimgy image JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 13:55, October 23, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - I think the player looking into the dungeon is the most interesting portion of this image. Without it, it's like: "Ohhhh it's a mass of brown steps! Yay!". --LiquidTalk 16:03, October 17, 2010 (UTC)

  • Weak oppose - Per the helm. --Coolnesse 16:13, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
  • Just delist - The current version has that ugly player in it, and the replacement version is too small. Plus, even if those flaws were fixed, the place is still boring. bad_fetustalk 16:16, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
  • ^ I agree, actually. --LiquidTalk 16:18, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
  • Delist or oppose - As per Helmet and Chess. User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 16:22, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - I think it looks much better without the player. Farming cape (t).png Lil cloud 9 Talk 18:24, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Per nom.Melee JudytjetalkMyface 20:09, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
  • Weak oppose - The first picture is better but has that player in the middle of it. Hunter cape (t).png Sentra246Blue hallowe'en mask.png 06:16, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support/Delist TBH, I'd rather have it delisted.  Ranged-icon.png Zap0i TalkRune scimitar.png  14:35, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
  • Delist - Not very interesting in the first place. Suppa chuppa Talk 21:20, October 21, 2010 (UTC)
  • Notice of intent - Nomination extended until October 31, 2010. --LiquidTalk 02:57, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
  • Delist - Per all. 222 talk 08:14, October 29, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Much better. Matt (t) 02:03, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
  • Closed - X mark.svg Nomination is unsuccessful; lack of consensus. C.ChiamTalk 10:40, November 1, 2010 (UTC)

Maggie's Camp

[[File:Camp maggie.PNG|thumb|250x250px|right|current]][[File:Aggie hut(temp).png|thumb|250x250px|right|new]] Reason: No player, AA, new location(near Draynor instead of Ardougne), less fog in the back.

  • Support - As nominator, in the category "cleaning up featured images". JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 18:03, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - I like the trail in the back. --LiquidTalk 18:09, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Since Maggie got relocated to Draynor, it makes perfectly good sense to update our featured image of her camp to show its new surroundings, right? In any case, I support this image replacement proposal. [10] N7 Elite (Ready to talk now?) 18:13, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Per nom, more up-to-date and maggie is on the image, and not on the current version.Melee JudytjetalkMyface 19:56, October 17, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - Terrible angle. Btw, replacing this does not mean removing the current version of the image since it is historical. Thus, comments about the image being updated makes no sense. bad_fetustalk 20:11, October 17, 2010 (UTC)

It does. Some people want the most up-to-date things on the main page, for a better reputation of "fastest updaters of images" JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 21:09, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
That also doesn't make any sense. We could put a rsc image on the mainpage, but nobody'd think that we haven't did anything here since rs2 was released. bad_fetustalk 16:08, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
Because then it is clear we intentionally placed a rsc image there, because this wiki started after rsc existed. For this case we did NOT intentionally place a historical image there, and we DO have a more up-to-date version, so it gives a better reputation. If i would go to the main page and i saw the image, i would think "i heard they update images very fast evrywhere, but apparently they don't". I really think we should have the best of the best on the main page, and that is also the newest version imo. JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 21:44, October 18, 2010 (UTC)

Weak support - Brighter, no player and the cauldron in better but it has a slightly worse angle. Hunter cape (t).png Sentra246Blue hallowe'en mask.png 06:26, October 18, 2010 (UTC) Oppose - I don't really care about the player, but the angle is a lot worse. And I can only see Wendy's back. Also, there is more fog and not less. My greatest reason is that it is a little too bright and the colours aren't sharp enough. User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 13:13, October 18, 2010 (UTC)

  • Neutral - I don't know; the main reason for me not to oppose is that the current image is historical (that was trippy...). The new image is a bit too bright, and the angle is less satisfactory. But the trail is nice.  Ranged-icon.png Zap0i TalkRune scimitar.png  14:46, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
  • Notice of intent - Nomination extended until October 31, 2010. --LiquidTalk 02:59, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Old one has better colors. --クールネシトーク 11:56, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
  • Support - Why wasn't it already updated? Matt (t) 02:06, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
Cuz it is a fimg i think... JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 03:10, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
I meant that, the updates been around for a while, and for it to be only updated recently... Matt (t) 04:55, November 1, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - The angle is much worse, you could see the skeleton things better in the old image. Farming cape (t).png Lil cloud 9 Talk 11:46, November 1, 2010 (UTC)

  • Closed - X mark.svg No consensus. --LiquidTalk 12:28, November 1, 2010 (UTC)

Zemouregal's fort

[[File:Zemourgeral's_Fort_HighRes.png|250x250px|right]] Description: The Fortress of the evil Mahjarrat Zemouregal.
Reason: Replacement of this image. It's taken with the OoO, has MSAA x4 and I manually removed badly AA done by Jagex's algorythm =P, it also has a nice screensaver res.

EDIT: For the ones saying "I don't like the angle", its about THE QUALITY, I had to tilt the camera to show the full building, I'm only doing this because I can't directly replace the image.

  • Support - As nomnomnator. ScionCrush 01:07, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
  • Support - Better angle. Hunter cape (t).png Sentra246Blue hallowe'en mask.png 01:09, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
  • Oppose - Although this one lets you see the whole building, the current image has this vibe I find really attracting, sorta like a horror film beginning. Achievements Coelacanth0794 Talk Contribs 02:47, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
  • Support - Per nomnom. 222 talk 04:08, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
  • Weak support - Better, but a pity you cannot see the most rightern pillar. User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 07:52, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
  • Oppose - I like the quality, but I don't like the angle. Suppa chuppa Talk 07:57, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
  • Support - And merge histories. No need for doopelcaet images.(Scion, next time upload to a host site please) JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 11:42, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
No need. If the nomination failes, the image can simply be deleted. Btw, host wiki has been deleted. :O User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 13:22, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
  • Support - Better angle LordDarkPhantom 13:15, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
  • Weak oppose - Granted, it's better quality, but it doesn't look as impressive from that angle. Real Crazy 13:26, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
  • Neutral - They're both very excellent images. The old one has greater detail and feeling, yet the new one shows the whole building. --クールネシトーク 13:47, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
  • Oppose - I don't like the angle. bad_fetustalk 18:20, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
  • Oppose - I don't like the angle, and it doesn't have that horror-looking feel to it like someone said. sssSp7p.pngIjLCqFF.png 19:29, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
  • Oppose - I don't like the angle, and it's not as impressive as the other image What I've done Ciphrius Kane Talk 16:28, January 31, 2011 (UTC)
  • Comment - Scion, why do you think that "I don't like the angle" is not a valid comment? Multiple factors, including the quality of the image and the angle at which it was taken, play into whether or not an image is deemed worthy of being featured. Suppa chuppa Talk 20:29, January 31, 2011 (UTC)
    • Because I'm not doing this for the image to be shown but rather to be able to replace it for a higher quality one, the angle has nothing to do; if anything the "I dont like the angle" discourages me from changing multiple scenary images I've already taken wich a FIGM's. ScionCrush 21:40, January 31, 2011 (UTC)
    • Well, your comments don't seem to be valid. Angle is very important in whether the image is better than the previous one. Yes, it may have more detail, but angle is also a factor. And don't be discouraged by the people complaining about the angle, not everyone has the same great taste as you do ;) LordDarkPhantom 10:31, February 5, 2011 (UTC)
  • Neutral - They're both great images, and I honestly don't notice much of a difference, so meh. Farming cape (t).png Lil cloud 9 Talk 05:26, February 1, 2011 (UTC)
  • Notice of intent - Deadline of nomination extended by a week to 13 February 2011. C.ChiamTalk 08:39, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
  • Support - Quality is BEAUTIFUL, but the angle ruins it...If the angle was correct, would've given it an AWESOME Support... My 1337 b0w1337rng3r|Talk Har har, my wikia bird, T-Hawk! 12:47, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
  • Comment - When I took images of Brambickle, I decided to go to the fort. I've taken a front view image with the same quality as this one and the entire building is visible. I'll nominate it after this has passed. User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 07:30, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
  • Closed - X mark.svg Nomination for replacement is unsuccessful; lack of consensus. C.ChiamTalk 07:38, February 13, 2011 (UTC)

Zemouregal's fort

Old image.

New image: Click here.
Reason: The other failed due to the angle. This is awesome quality and angle!

  • Support - As nominator. User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 09:06, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
  • Support - You can see the whole castle. Hunter cape (t).png Sentra246Blue hallowe'en mask.png 09:08, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
  • Support - Per Sentra. --クールネシトーク 15:30, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
  • AMG EIPC STORGN SUPPROT - MUCH BGIGR ADN U ESE TEH FLUL CATSLE JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 17:02, FEBRUARY 13, 2011 (UTC)
  • Strong support - Really has that creepy look an evil castle should have. Arianwyn chathead.png Iestin Talk Seren symbol.png 17:05, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
  • Support - Good job. Achievements Coelacanth0794 Talk Contribs 17:07, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
  • Support - MUCH better. sssSp7p.pngIjLCqFF.png 17:10, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
  • Support - Better. LordDarkPhantom 19:58, February 18, 2011 (UTC)
  • Closed - Yes check.svg Nomination for replacement is successful. C.ChiamTalk 09:35, February 20, 2011 (UTC)