RuneScape:Featured images/File:Cockroach soldier in habitat.png (delist)

[[:File:Cockroach soldier in habitat.png]]

[[File:Cockroach soldier in habitat.png|250px|right]] Reason - "Boring, Small image, and no wow effect"
Original nomination - RuneScape:Featured_images/archive3#Cockroach_soldier

• Strong support - As nominator. Dead evil84 ^Talk[Myface] 13:45, September 30, 2010 (UTC)
• Strong support - I was gonna nom it, but I kept forgetting, anyways, first of all it's small, and undetailed. Second, the main reason I wanted it delisted, it freaks me out. I don't want to see a disgusting cockroach on the mainpage. (Yes, I also freak out when I see roaches irl. They are disgusting.) bad_fetus^talk 13:51, October 15, 2010 (UTC)
• Support - Was gonna nom a replacement for this, but forgot a while ago. --Coolnesse 14:13, October 15, 2010 (UTC)
• Strong support - This is absolutely disgusting. If it was just a roach, it wouldn't be that bad. But, you're adding in all that yucky green goo in the background. This is certainly not the type of image that we want featured. --Liquid^Talk 14:13, October 15, 2010 (UTC)
• Support - Despite the fact that I really like cockroaches (I even had a pet one once), this image humiliates my roachy buddies. It's not good at all. User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 15:30, October 15, 2010 (UTC)

You serious? Remind me not to touch you if I ever see you irl D: bad_fetus^talk 15:40, October 15, 2010 (UTC)

Well, I like insects. If you don't, I'm perfectly fine. He isn't. User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 17:51, October 15, 2010 (UTC)

Insects freak me out, though this one looks cool. LordDarkPhantom 19:09, October 15, 2010 (UTC)

• Strong oppose - Good background and nice stance. LordDarkPhantom 19:09, October 15, 2010 (UTC)
• Support - Eeeeek!!! it's an ugly image! JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 20:57, October 15, 2010 (UTC)

Shouldn't this image be speedy deleted because it has no use, and does not add to the article? there is already the trans'd image, and the background is no addition. I think the thing should be speedy deleted if this delist nom passes. JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 23:44, October 15, 2010 (UTC)

• Support - Per nom. Matt (t) 00:35, October 16, 2010 (UTC)
• Support - Per Chess. I don't think it needs to be deleted though...   Zap0i ^Talk  02:43, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

(ha)waii not? bout evry1 supports, and the opposer does not have a phenomenal reasons that beats all other reasons... JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 16:44, October 16, 2010 (UTC)

...The fact is, just because it is (probably) not an FI anymore, it doesn't mean that it cannot stay in the article. However I agree with you there, it doesn't have a good enough reason to remain. LordDarkPhantom 08:45, October 17, 2010 (UTC)

• Support - The only thing remotely attention-grabbing about this image is the lighting, and even that isn't too great. Otherwise, it's just a picture of a bug.  Tien  03:34, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
• Strong support - It's a non-transparent bug. 222 ^talk 03:36, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
• Support - How is that even a FIMG, it's small, quite boring, the only good bit is the kinda fluro green. Sentra246 09:02, October 17, 2010 (UTC)

Bcus the lighting detail thingy was new then, and they liked the greenishness. JOEYTJE50TALK pull my finger 10:26, October 17, 2010 (UTC)

• Support - Not featured image worthy. Judytje_talk^Myface 20:02, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
• Closed - Image will be delisted. --Liquid^Talk 00:48, October 22, 2010 (UTC)