RuneScape:Article of the Month/Cape of Accomplishment
Skillcapes changed RuneScape in late 2006. They have single-handedly given more players a reason to train up certain skills to 99. Also, this article is one of the Wiki's most popular pages. It is well-detailed, well-written (with very few, if any grammatical errors) and tells a player almost anything a player would want to know about skillcapes. I think this article deserves to features on the main page.
Support - 11
Neutral - 0
Oppose - 1
Support - As nominator. 08:20, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Support - Makes all the important points pretty clearly. However, the trivia section needs to be revised before featuring, there's some useless information (e.g. The Quest cape can't be trimmed. That's said in the article itself.) Otherwise, good article. It isn't loaded with animations either. dictature 21:19, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Oppose - The page is too short, and has little information about the cape. The only actual words come from like 2 paragraphs in the beginning and the trivia; the rest of the article is a huge table. Zezzima 01:53, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
Support - Since they came out, I, along with most people I meet, strive to recieve a skill cape. It is a prestige honor, and I believe it's AotM material. Chaos Monk Talk • Sign 01:52, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Support - Absolutely, especially with the pic of Kytti getting her farming cape trimmed. --Degenret01 09:10, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Support - I don't think that pic is a good reason, as it is very unclear, but the article is okay :-P. 15:25, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Support and Comment - Zezzima I was going to support to support your nomination but I decided Cape of Accomplishment is more worthy.
- comment - FFS!!! this article is WAAAAYYY too short!! Plus, I don't know why that outdated sign was at the ge page anyways. I removed it since there was no update for ge in a long time.
- Comment- article length has no affect on whether an article should be AOTM or not...AOTMs are supposed to show quality not quantity. In fact I would support this article if I hadn't already nominated one myself. 03:37, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
- Length has nothing to do with the quality. Godsword and Santa hat are fairly small articles compared to some other AotM (like Armour and Mournings End Part 2). I'm guessing there was an obselete template on the GE page as it wasn't fully updated since the it was last updated. 15:07, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Comment and Support - Firstly I like the article, the animated images, and the table format. However, I don't like the extensive Trivia section, much of which is fairly pointless, and could be included in the articles for each specific skillcape. Zezzima, you seem to simply be opposing and attempting to discredit other articles nominated simply because it's not your own nomination, and the comment on this entry seems to support that, as it relates to your nomination rather than the Skillcape article. Khalron 13:18, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Support - Great article, very clear, comprehensive.15:07, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Support - Great page.--
12:15, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
Support I just love this article. One of my favorites. Kayteen7 18:47, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Support It's a great article, with all the information you ever need to know about skillcapes --Template:Signatures/ma44040 21:32, 28 May 2009 (UTC)