RuneScape:Article of the Month/2007

From the RuneScape Wiki, the wiki for all things RuneScape
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive
This page or section is an archive.
Please do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to the current project page or contact an administrator for aid if no talk page exists.

January[edit source]

Article of the month: Pyramid Plunder

Agility[edit source]

Except for the redlinks in some places, I think this is pretty good! It needs a few pictures, but the whole article (especially the Shortcut table) looks like featured article-calibur to me. The redlinks will have to be made into actual links soon, though, but that can't be too hard. 7kyt1iT.gif --WINE OF GOOD HEALTH (Actually Stinko)14:39, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Weak support: Could do with some improvement --Eucarya Talk 01:21, 28 December 2006 (UTC)


half hearted support A good guide but needs improvement.Green partyhat.png Bob2006ty(RUNESTORM333)  talk Green partyhat.png

Bank[edit source]

A good example of how a community can put together an article and it be great! --Eucarya 22:59, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Oppose Not exactly a long article Andy mci 19:20, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Weak Support I change my vote.--Andy mci 18:56, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Weak Oppose Although I did a lot of work on this article I don't think it is capabable to be featured yet. The oppose is weak because I still believe you guys can complete the information soon. rivi2002hk 08:28, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

February[edit source]

Article of the month: Contact!

Contact![edit source]

A stellar wiki achievement. A highest rated quest covered by a comprehensive walkthrough with very helpfull and high quality dungeon maps on the same day as the quest release is a major wiki showcase. Quest walkthroughs generally are regarded as very useful to players. I used the availability of the Contact quest walkthrough and the dungeon maps as a selling point for the wiki to several friends. It is recent and neither a skill nor a minigame page. Miw 14:38, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

I agree! Also, the fact that it was done the day of release is awesome! 1$ 14:58, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Indeed it is very impressive and you're right, the fact that it was created on the day of it's release, it's a great candidate! Also, not many red links (leading to nothing) are in the article and it is wonderfully written. Yup, I vote yes!Yellow partyhat.png Ilyas Talk Contribs16:01, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
I agree. It's high time we had a quest featured. --Eucarya Talk 16:50, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Support - it helped me and i've added more to it. Chrislee33 07:28, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Support - 1 more vote and its and auto win. --Whiplash 19:26, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Support One of the best Quest articles on this Wiki. However after this one we should move away from Kharidian Desert articles.Chaoticar 20:18, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Support Good guide. The maps are comprehensive. I helped out with the strategy section, and it's a good guide overall. Dtm142 22:52, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Contact! is now February's AoTM, though well wait till February to put it on the front page. =) --Whiplash 23:50, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

(Pardon me if I spelt February wrong its how its spelled in Canada.)

First time we've ever actually had 5 votes woot! --Eucarya Talk 23:59, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
It's actually 8 votes - I've bolded the other supporting votes including the nominator. Chrislee33 01:32, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

April[edit source]

Article of the month: Mining

Slayer[edit source]

A truly inspired page on Slayer. It is short and still one of the best guides on the skill. Especially, since it carries some solid advice on how the various ways to train this difficult skill. Training suggestions are hard to put in a neutral and objective fashion, but this page really stands out in this respect. Recommend it as page of the month for January --Miw 13:54, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, I wrote the "Advanced" section though I really can't claim to be too advanced at 81 slayer. Support though it could do with a bit of work (quite why i recommended an obby maul as 3rd best weapon i have no idea, etc) --Eucarya Talk 01:21, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Support a truly magnificent guide. (Will probs be AoTM for April) --Whiplash 18:34, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Support really brilliant content, used to get 55 slayer, but I think it is a little dissapointing image-wise with only a very large picture of vannaka. Green partyhat.png Bob2006ty(RUNESTORM333)  talk Green partyhat.png

Oppose. There's no pictures! User page "Katshuma" Talk page 16:15, 26 March 2007 (UTC) AGAINST This article needs a lot of cleanup, and also many of the sections need to be moved out into their own sections. Maybe once this has been done. Endasil (Talk) @ 22:24, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Castle Wars[edit source]

Great content, nice pics for probably the most popular mini-game in runescape. Nominating for featured article (and I'm amazed it hasn't been nominated before). --Eucarya Talk 16:54, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Support. It is a popular minigame, and it has some good content. Support. --Miw 21:48, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Support I was the one who added the pics... ^^ Katshuma 12:24, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Article of the Month!!!! Has the most votes, if you disagree wait until next month and VOTE! --Whiplash 16:46, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Entrana[edit source]

A good and comprehensive guide for this humble little island, nominating for featured article. --Eucarya Talk 16:53, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Just scanning the article i spotted a few missing info. (e.g. picture does not show balloon teleport spot, no section on the law altar, some red links, no mention of seaweed respawns). These are not major issues, but such omissions should not exist in a feature article. --Miw 21:56, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

weak support these details have now been added to the article, I think it's a good easy to read article. Green partyhat.png Bob2006ty(RUNESTORM333)  talk Green partyhat.png

Support. it's an important island that features in many quests.--Atlantima 11:19, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

SupportI think it is an article with lots of inormation in it.

I Support this, although this doesn't look as good as the magic article or have as many images it still has good content. Green partyhat.png Bob2006ty(RUNESTORM333)  talk Green partyhat.png 15 March 2007 13:14 (UTC)

Ranged[edit source]

it's well formatted with pictures of the weapons, level requirments, and even how to utilize the weapons. it is the best ranged guide i have used, better than all the other fan sites i use and i use a lot. good job whoever made itHartra34 19:19, 16 March 2007 (UTC)


Oppose in comparison to the magic guide which has been a featured article, it is bland and uncolourful, not all the information is included, e.g. tzhaar weapons, and it lacks pictures of range in practice. Green partyhat.png Bob2006ty(RUNESTORM333)  talk Green partyhat.png Oppose per Bob2006ty

Tai Bwo Wannai Cleanup[edit source]

I don't think there's something in this minigame, which is not listed here. User page "Katshuma" Talk page 19:13, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Thieving[edit source]

A very well written guide lots of good info and pictures. --Whiplash 20:19, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Support. This is a pretty good article, maybe needs a section on training through the levels...--Kang227 15:35, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Oppose-while it IS written nicely, the part about Blackjacking (or any part of the Mini-game references in the Thieving article) is crap. That,and there's too many redlinks. Just my opinion. 7kyt1iT.gif --WINE OF GOOD HEALTH (Actually Stinko)

Support. I recently eliminated most of the redlinks by creating the basic articles. My fellow users are busy filling these new articles in. --DavidOwnz 04:09, 9 March 2007 (UTC) Oppose It isn't quite ready to be featured yet, it is only three quarters finished. Green partyhat.png Bob2006ty(RUNESTORM333)  talk Green partyhat.png

User:Vimescarrot[edit source]

User pages are a distinctive feature of the runescape wiki (or indeed of every wiki). Many user pages contain interesting information. The Vimescarrot user page is a great example. Particularly the part of the Tzhaar translations is both informative and entertaining. The main reason to advertize a user page on the front page is to drive home this unique aspect of the wiki.

Really? I'm honoured. I'm never normally particularly involved in Featured Articles and suchlike. But you have my blessing to do with my userpage as you will... JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot 15:30, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

...: :D --Whiplash 23:09, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

It occurs to me that some of my subpages are actualy a bit rubbish, especially the price guide bit... ^.^ JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot 08:51, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Support...(?) -- This is kind of strange... Your user page is a great example, but... errr... I thought this was a joke when I first saw it on your page. Still, it is a great example, not too long, yet not too short, very interesting, no nonsense in it (you said your sub pages were!), and it isn't really boring, like mine ^_^, it is an example of boring!Yellow partyhat.png Ilyas Talk Contribs18:31, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Even if it is a joke...hey maybe we can have it up on April 1st. JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot 19:40, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Like I said over on the fake image page, I don't feel that an article about something actually not in RuneScape should represent a RuneScape wiki. It'd be strange for new people to come to the Wiki looking for RuneScape stuff and instead see an article about Vimescarrot. No offense or anything. Cool Spy0 19:48, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Oppose...My userpage is not about RuneScape. That doesn't mean that I've withdrawn my permission, though. JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot 21:19, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

The main reason for putting a user page forward is that the concept of user pages is something unique for the wiki. No other fan site has such a concept. If there is another way to draw attention to this unique selling point, it would have my strong support. As a feature article should point to a exemplary bit of RS information, my recommendation is perhaps not justifiable.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Miw (talk).
Half-hearted Oppose. Yes, the user pages may be a "selling" point of the wiki, but making this featured when it can change so much probably isn't a good idea (also, the owner of a user page should have full control over it). Having an article featured increases the number of eyeballs that see it, and some of those will improve that and related articles. I'm sure Vimes will hand over some of his good stuff at some point (eg TzHaar stuff) and maybe we can feature that. --Eucarya Talk 09:33, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Changed to Oppose'. It is true that Wikis are unique, but it should have something related to RuneScape. If new users saw this, they would think this is some kind of blog site for RuneScpae, which it isn't. So I have changed my vote from a "yay" to a "nay".Yellow partyhat.png Ilyas Talk Contribs16:07, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Oppose. We shouldn't feature a user page when we have so many great guides that have never been featured. While I do appreciate the unique quality of the Wiki: that all contributors has their own pages to represent themselves and their own talk pages to discuss matters important to them, I don't think that user pages should be our main feature. I do believe it would be a good idea to display one of the best user pages we could find in order to encourage readers to join the wiki. This user page should be excellently put together, with cool user boxes and templates, showing off everything that this Wiki has to offer. We do have a unique editing and processing system that is copyrighted by Wikipedia.org and the Wikimedia Foundation. Let's display our best user page and show readers why this Wiki is the best RuneScape guide site. By the way, my user page definitely doesn't qualify. Anyone have a great user page or know someone who does? It can't have any templates like 'noob hater' or something similar. We need to make this a discussion page... --Gangsterls 21:37, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Oh, also, as you can see, I'm in favor of featuring a user page, just not Vimescarrot's (sorry lol). It doesn't look as dynamic or professional as a featured article should. If Vimescarrot shaped it up a bit, we could feature it for sure. --Gangsterls 21:39, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Not a chance, my userpage is for personal use...lol :) JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot 22:04, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
If someone really likes you, they could nominate you on RuneScape:Requested Featured Users. --Whiplash 23:49, 26

February 2007 (UTC) I am against making a user page "Page of the month" because it isn't really a proper page. I shall admit that his page is truely a masterpiece although I don't think it can be called officialy page of the month. Though this has gave me an idea, who thinks that we should have a "User Page of the month"???--Hyrule Link 16:32, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Oppose This is a user page, it's not specifically about Runescape, although Vimes has a great page, I don't think it should be on the front page, or any other user for that matter. Unless they are ... !!!! wait a second I have had a great idea!!! (rare event) why don't we have a user of the month award! and have user of the month on the homepage! it could be judged by all top active users (eg megalodon llyas eucarya hyneaste vimescarrot dreadnought etc etc) (or just all the users?) (or judged by the administrators) and you have to be nominated by another person, (can't nominate yourself) Green partyhat.png Bob2006ty(RUNESTORM333)  talk Green partyhat.png 18:25, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Umm... you know this is over?Yellow partyhat.png Ilyas Talk Contribs18:25, 4 March 2007 (UTC) Hw was I supposed to know that????????? Green partyhat.png Bob2006ty(RUNESTORM333)  talk Green partyhat.png
There already is a requested featured user. See.Yellow partyhat.png Ilyas Talk Contribs20:12, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
And Dreadnought is not active!Yellow partyhat.png Ilyas Talk Contribs20:14, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

May[edit source]

Article of the month: TzTok-Jad

TzTok-Jad[edit source]

This is a pretty good one. It gives advice on how to beat this very hard monster.

Its about time we had a monster as our featured article. -Sworddude319

  • Outstanding Support Most likely are most well writen monster article. --Whiplash 12:48, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Support - I don't like it, nor I hate it, but it is more detailed than most articles. Dragon medium helm! Whaddaya know?Chiafriend12Better than rune!Loon is best buttlord 18:32, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Support - It's a very good article, and pretty much all featured articles til now have been skills, places, or minigames.--Atlantima 13:48, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
  • TzTok-Jad is now the article of the month for May. --Whiplash 20:28, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Isn't that jumping the gun a little? we still have 15 days worth of voting --Eucarya Talk 10:31, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Has the 5 vote rule changed :O? --Whiplash 13:36, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Yeah I mean, I was the one who suggested TzTok-Jad in the 1st place but thats a bit of a big jump. But if youre sure... no complants from me! -Sworddude319

  • Extreme Support We need a monster article and this is well-writen about something well known. Law rune.pngSyugecin Edit CountRune scimitar old.png 19:08, 16 April 2007 (UTC) (6 votes now :D)
  • Support. It is good to have a monster page as page of the month. My only issue is that the Jad page is not a typical monster page (with drop lists and stuff). --Miw 09:53, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Support - Superb article. Chaoticar 09:01, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Support. Now this has 9 supports, plus one from the nominator, so it has 10 supports, so now we can say TzTok-Jad is now Featured Article for May. ДҖ--Huanghe63talk 23:52, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Cold War[edit source]

Great trivia section, great pics, great guide. Nominating for featured article --Eucarya Talk 17:30, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Weak oppose. I didn't like the article. It's made like that there's only text. Some lists or tables should make it easier to read and pictures are too small. It was boring to read the whole article. User page "Katshuma" Talk page 13:35, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Trouble Brewing[edit source]

One of the two minigame articles I think deserve more attention. Very well writen also. --Whiplash 20:29, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Yes this is excellent - support --Eucarya Talk 01:21, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Heh. One of mine. Worked hard on it, despite it being a less-played minigame. ^^ Of course I support it. Avian Maid 21:00, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
support Great article, there are even pictures after everything it describes. One of the best descriptions and guides to anything ive seen yet. Uldivad9 22:16, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Support with a capital s, great content lots of images and details here. Green partyhat.png Bob2006ty(RUNESTORM333)  talk Green partyhat.png Support Great guide, and it's nice to see an obscure part of Runescape become a featured article.

Woodcutting[edit source]

I believe it is a great guide for woodcutting :) Very good. Very good indeed. Onyx.pngMalestro 17:05, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Support - I do as well, I found it to be very thourough and understandable Tokijin777 18:27, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Strong Support - I not only find this article well-made and easy to use, I use it a lot when I woodcut (my highest lvl, at 75). User:Smarternu 18:48, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Support - What the above user said =} Dragon chainbody.pngEmosworldSysop crown.svg 06:27, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Support a great article, also my favorite skill--Woodcutting-icon.pngJigo22Rune battleaxe.pngHave A Nice Day!!!Yay! 04:28, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Fake image[edit source]

This article is well-written, descriptive, and helpful. It taps into a previously untouched sector of Runescape: media. Kang227 15:52, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

I agree this article is also very funny and desperately needs more attention

I believe it should be made a bit longer, and maybe recognized but not for long, as it is not directly linked to runescape.

Article of the month. That means it lasts for a month, no more, no less. JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot 16:45, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
I don't think this should be a featured article because it's not exactly part of RuneScape. Sure, it's a fun thing many people do (myself included from time to time) but I don't think it should represent an enitre Wiki. Cool Spy0 19:44, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Actually, that's exactly the reason I'm inclinced to support this. (That's not a support, it's an "inclined to".) It shows our wiki is not purely about those aspects of the game that Jagex do, but about more...I haven't read the article, so I couldn't really comment on it in terms of content, but the idea of having an AotM that's not part of RuneScape itself sounds highly appealing (sp?) to me. JalYt-Xil-Vimescarrot 21:17, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

I support (if I need to add a reason, add a note to my talkEbany of the Fakes 20:05, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

The fake image article is great. It has detailed instructions on how to make a fake, and even has a font helper at the bottom. I support this article.Gambler 10 23:49, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Problem is the finding out how to get the fonts out of the font helper. Lol. I know how... just no good programs right now. But I support this. It is a nice article. I believe it deserves to be on the front page. And it isn't DIRECTLY related to Runescape.. But it is still about it. Onyx.pngMalestro

support very helpful and descriptive I think it deserves to be featured. Green partyhat.png Bob2006ty(RUNESTORM333)  talk Green partyhat.png

SUPPORT! This is a truly good article, no matter how silly it is. I think there should be more of this floating about on the web. - Smarternu

Strong Support After looking through this, I feel that this would be an excellent article to feature. Though it doesn't directly deal with RuneScape, it still technically is related to that general topic. Very well-written and humorous, all articles should definitely resemble this one's quality. Thunderbird346 14:36, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Strong Oppose fake images can be done to any MMORPG, including that this article has nothing that strongly says wow when you first look at it. --Whiplash 14:37, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Strong Oppose I feel this article really has nothing to do with the gameplay of runescape specifically. Maybe this should be a featured article on MMORPG wiki, but not on Runescape wiki. Woc93 16:40, 6 April 2007

6 Supports and 1 Oppose. Whup-de-do. Whiplash, you are a very cynical person. Just throwing that out there.--Kang227 14:07, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Fake image[edit source]

My vote is here i make lots of fakes and i will keep doing so This is an awesome article. It has detailed instructions on how to make a fake, and how to do it very easily too. So I support it. Blue partyhat.pngJalYt-Ket-Gambler 10Blue partyhat.pngTalk 22:11, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Neutral. Fake Image article is great, but it's not directly related to RuneScape, rather a fan-made thing. I don't think we should feature it. User page "Katshuma" Talk page 06:26, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Support. I wrote it (giggles). I think it's a good guide. --Kang227 14:42, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Strong Oppose. This is not directly likned to RuneScape nor is it an extremly impressive article. --Whiplash 15:22, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Likned? You mean linked? I don't think that JUST because other games can do the same thing makes the article more or less impressive. --Kang227 15:43, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

But it's still not linked directly ro RuneScape. User page "Katshuma" Talk page 17:32, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Same opposition here. Excellent information, but you might as well make a world of warcraft fake.--Shotoku64 23:55, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose - Nice article, but it's too much of a guide rather than an article, and an article more oriented towards the game would make a better FA.  AScott00  Rubber chicken.png 23:10, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Strong Support! - Quite a comprehensive article and it's as much about RuneScape as the Money Making Guide is. Dragon medium helm! Whaddaya know?Chiafriend12Better than rune!Loon is best buttlord 18:29, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose That's not true. The Money Making Guide contains tips on making money in Runescape, hence it helps you play the game, as most articles do. Advice on how to make a fake image in no way helps you play Runescape, and therefore is much less related than the Money Making Guide. I oppose on these grounds, not on the quality of the article (which I haven't really looked at, I confess). Endasil (Talk) @ 21:11, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose - Alright article. The main problem is that fake images have next to nothing to do with RuneScape. Chaoticar 09:00, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Extreme Support This article is awsome and before reading this article I had no idea how people managed to make fakes now not only do I understand but I also want to try and make one or two. This is an awsome article that deserves to be the Article of the Month!Wisrobe56 02:33, 26 April 2007 (UTC)Wisrobe56

Super Strong Oppose. This article isn't really impressive. I can list lots of better articles than this one. Dragon chainbody.pngEmosworldSysop crown.svg 06:25, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Extreme Oppose - i love fake making but i dont think this really has anything do do with Runescape it self, for instance- half of the fakes uploaded on this website have to do with halo, E.E, or some COMPLETELY different game...Woodcutter631 00:28, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Mining[edit source]

Our mining page is well written and has a good layout, needless to say it is brilliant.--Hyrule Link 16:28, 2 March

2007 (UTC) 

Support-excellently written Anyuan753 00:04, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Support- Looks Good And Good Detail. Hovering over for a look? Imperic 20:45, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Support a good article Green partyhat.png Bob2006ty(RUNESTORM333)  talk Green partyhat.png

Support really like the powermining section with the times per level. Mathwhiz90601 21:21, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Oppose - Sorry, the article lacks information on limestone (& others?) as a part of construction and is almost completely lacking information on members mines. (Yes I will update when I get a chance, but have no time now). What's there -is- good just the article is incomplete as it stands. - ChrisWar666 16:24, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Support. I fixed it a bit. User page "Katshuma" Talk page 16:06, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

SupportI already know alot about mining, but it still gave good strategies for miners. It is also big and has enough information for anything you need to know.--Shotoku64 22:54, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Weak Oppose I'm not sure the training section is very good. --Whiplash 10:32, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

SUPPORT! Really great article Runecrafting-icon.pngDerial(Boywithbrain) Defence-icon.png

Support Good article. Chaoticar 09:28, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Mining is April's featured article --Eucarya Talk 09:54, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

June[edit source]

Article of the month: Desert Treasure

Cooking[edit source]

Fairly comprehensive guide was lacking many details not long ago. Has been edited by much of the community would be a good article of the month. --Whiplash 21:38, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Support. Good article. User page "Katshuma" Talk page 14:03, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Well, it's ok, tentative support. Just glancing over it I see certain bits missing - dairy (butter churn, etc), baked potatoes, and it barely mentions the cooking guild. --Eucarya Talk 15:54, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Small support It could be better but I like it. SyugecinDragon halberd.pngtalkcontribs
Oppose I think it has an awful lot of red links for an article of the month. Tesfan 15:20, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Fake image[edit source]

This article is awsome and before reading this article I had no idea how people managed to make fakes now not only do I understand but I also want to try and make one or two. This is an awsome article that deserves to be the Article of the Month! --Wisrobe56.

STRONG OPPOSE as per its last 3 or so nominations it has nothing that actually has to do with RuneScape. --Whiplash 22:50, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

SUPPORT WITH ALL THE STRENGTH IN MY HEART!!! Has helpde many (like me) and it shows how to turn everyday RS pics into hilarious pics. Dragon medium helm! Whaddaya know?Chiafriend12Better than rune!Loon is best buttlord 22:58, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Well I think we just canceled each others votes out. Ah well back to square one. :P --Whiplash 23:12, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
OPPOSE this has nothing to do with playing RuneScape. Additionally, it's a tutorial, not an article. While the page may be cool, article of the month? No. Endasil (Talk) @ 12:19, 4 May 2007 (UTC)#
SUPER HYPER MEGA GIGA ULTRA EXTREME OPPOSE!!!! This is the 3rd time this article has been nominated for featured article and it is not fit there! Not related to RuneScape, can be made from anything, like World of Warcraft, new people are using it to fill this wiki with pages like "User:Newguyhere/Fakesthathavenosense", it's going too far soon. I think this article is more likely ruining this wiki and not being creative. User page "Katshuma" Talk page 13:46, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Um... Katshuma? That's going a bit far. Oh well. SUPER HYPER MEGA EXTREME FANCY CRAZY ULTRA MAXIMUM BOOSTED PENDING I can't decide.... SyugecinDragon halberd.pngtalkcontribs
What the Hell do you guys mean by it "not being related to rs"? Atleast it says what fakes are, unlike the Buddies article that does not at all mention what it is. I'll go rewrite it so it's not a tutorial. Dragon medium helm! Whaddaya know?Chiafriend12Better than rune!Loon is best buttlord 04:37, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
I forgot to say this, but I didn't rewrite the article because it is not a tutorial, but has one in it. Dragon medium helm! Whaddaya know?Chiafriend12Better than rune!Loon is best buttlord 17:32, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
Heh, interesting I always thought a "buddy" was a friend you had on RS. Boy was I wrong. You're absolutely right, Chia, but the fact is, the Buddies article is not being nominated for AOTM, and Fake is. Therefore, we can't compare it to another article, it has to hold the highest standards of articles. In terms of not being relevant, here's my worry: Joe-schmo finds the Wiki one day while searching for Runescape help. He goes to the main page, and the first thing he sees is some fan-based article--something that has nothing to do with playing RS. He then goes away because he sees the wiki as some fan-site dedicated to the fan-world of RS, not RS itself. What I'm trying to say is, not only does an article have to be very well-written and helpful (which the Fake article is), it really needs to represent the wiki as a whole...and I don't think a page not about RS does a good job of representing the RS wiki. Endasil (Talk) @ 19:24, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

K, I decided, Very Weak Oppose It's not directly related to RuneScape itself. SyugecinDragon halberd.pngtalkcontribs 01:35, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Support! And to those who say it's not related to Runescape, it is. And DON'T say it isn't JUST because you can do the same for other games! I can cook in WoW, too, but I'm not saying we shouldn't nominate a Cooking article. Making that point is idiotic. Kang227 14:08, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose It has nothing to do WITH THE GAME ITSELF. It would just be like have "the runescape forums" has an aotm. Tesfan 23:01, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Treasure Trails Guide[edit source]

I think it's good enough to be featured now. --Eucarya Talk 13:11, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Weak support Nice but kinda complicated... User page "Katshuma" Talk page 13:50, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose helpful, but kinda boring if your trying to read the entire page in one sitting. it'd be like reading a list of all the items in the game. You could, and you might find some intresting ones, but you would have to sift past a lost of boring info before you found something intresting. Tesfan 03:39, 5 May 2007 (UTC) Support Fragmented slightly but good. SyugecinDragon halberd.pngtalkcontribs 01:35, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Kalphite Queen[edit source]

Good article on a monster. Has good information. May need (a little) more pictures though. =/ SyugecinDragon halberd.pngtalkcontribs

Weak oppose I think because we just did a featured article on a monster, that mabye we should wait before doing another monster as a featured article. Tesfan 03:32, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Same reason. User page "Katshuma" Talk page 15:26, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

So? If it's good, it should be featured even if it is the same as before. SyugecinDragon halberd.pngtalkcontribs 01:35, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Yes, it's good, but it's not the only good article we have. Someone one looking at the featured article for this month might get the wrong impression that the only good articles we have are monster articles. Tesfan 14:30, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

'Oppose I agree with the above; also, the page lacks an infobox, which I consider vital. Mathwhiz90601 00:20, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Recipe for Disaster[edit source]

I think we should do Recipe for Disaster as a AOTM because:

1. It is well written.

2. We havn't done a quest as a AOTM for a while.

3. It is the 100th quest, as well as being the largest quest in the game. Tesfan

Strong oppose. No pictures! (Expect 1.) User page "Katshuma" Talk page 15:26, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

I've been working on that ^^ Thieving-icon.pngMomento Mori Real PainNot Champagne01:28, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Oppose, no pics, not a good quest guide. Dragon medium helm! Whaddaya know?Chiafriend12Better than rune!I have 12 friends. 14:31, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Desert Treasure[edit source]

Cool quest, lots of pictures, and I still think that we should do a quest article as an AOTM. Tesfan

Support SyugecinDragon halberd.pngtalkcontribs 01:35, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Support User page "Katshuma" Talk page 06:03, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Strongly Support Was going to nominate it last night but it was too much hassle XD. Great article and one of the errrr how to say it.... more famous quests? Plus the guides to the other required quests are well written, I've used all of them on the build up and when I reach the fm and thieving lvls I'll be using the main article so it obviously comprehensive. VOTE FOR IT OR DIE:PCrystal bow.pngKeepin It Rhyl Ranged-icon.png10:24, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Support I agree, this is the holy grail for combat magic users, no? And the word you are searching for, Katsuma, is 'infamous'. Mathwhiz90601 00:46, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Support --Eucarya Talk 10:05, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Support was nominated once before. --Whiplash 23:08, 14 May 2007 (UTC) I just did it about a week ago so I give it a SUPER STRONG SUPPORT!!!White partyhat.png Patcong talk White partyhat.png00:33, 22 May 2007 (UTC) Support Nice article on an interesting quest. --Miw 10:57, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

I used it, had no trouble with Desert Treasure, I support Endasil (Talk) @ 14:37, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Well, thats 10 supports and 0 opposes. Is it safe to say that this will be the Article of the Month? Tesfan 01:00, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Rune armour[edit source]

Great article. By far the best of all the different armor types. I looked at them all and rune has the most information... even has a good bit on rune in RSC, the editor, now banned, spent time finding rune classic screen shots and recolored them. Also has guilded and pictures, prices and such.Woodcutter631 00:48, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

STRONG SUPPORT!! - Total Rune put a lot of work in making what the prototype pruple rune could look like, but someone had to block him! >:O And yes, very detailed! Dragon medium helm! Whaddaya know?Chiafriend12Better than rune!Loon is best buttlord 02:00, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

July[edit source]

Article of the month: Kalphite Queen

Tai Bwo Wannai Cleanup[edit source]

Current Votes

  • Support - 5
  • Oppose - 0
  • Neutral - 0

This article has lots of information and consists everything needed from the actual minigame. Nominating for featured article. Don't forget my vote is support too. User page "Katshuma" Talk page 04:40, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Support. 203.63.185.102 10:44, 10 June 2007 (UTC) IPs cannot vote. Oddlyoko talk

Omg we need votes here, what are we going to do? User page "Katshuma" Talk page 21:19, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

I'l put it on site notice. Tesfan 02:59, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

I beatcha to it! =D Syugecinspam 03:03, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Curses! Foiled again! =D Tesfan 03:06, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Support- This article has just everything you need to know about the minigame. It has appropriate pictures and abundant information in an orderly fashion. Tylerbeg (talk·contribs) 09:34, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Support - General me 13:04, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

It's stupid that sitenotice is protected, so that I can't edit it. User page "Katshuma" Talk page 16:42, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Kalphite Queen[edit source]

Current Votes

  • Support - 8
  • Oppose - 1
  • Neutral - 0

I think it's safe to nominate this again, since TzTok-Jad isn't feat anymore. Syugecinspam 03:03, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

I think it's a good page; I especially like the two Queen form photos. A few pictures during battle might do some good here though. Oddlyoko talk 03:33, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Quite. *Smokes a monicle*, and how! Why, ol chap. Support! Blankothe3rd 13:12, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Oppose, I think there's too few pictures in it. User page "Katshuma" Talk page 16:47, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Support Easter egg.png Avenged Pumpkin.png Talk 04:16, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Support Dragon chainbody.pngEmosworldSysop crown.svg 23:18, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Support King Black Dragon.png This dude is evil King Black Dragon.png like hellKorak 08:55, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Support, but I think there could be a few more pictures added to the article, just to make it look better. Drksrpntdrgn 21:12, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Support, I think the article should be presented with updated images of the Kalphite Queen (after her revamp). Mr. Garrison 18:29, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

I think it's safe to do this. Kalphite Queen is now the featured Article for July Syugecinspam 03:09, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Little late, but Support! Sysop crown.svg Megalodon99 (Talk) score 13:25, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

August[edit source]

Article of the month: Trouble Brewing

King Black Dragon[edit source]

This article is informative, has an image, and is very good.

Support as nom. General me 14:42, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Support it Rune battleaxe.pngJigo22Rune battleaxe.png 03:43, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Trouble Brewing[edit source]

Support: 5

Oppose: 0

Neutral: 0

Construction[edit source]

Current Votes

  • Support - 2
  • Oppose - 2
  • Neutral - 1

While i feel this skill is somewhat dangerous, expensive, and can be downright boring, i feel that construction is a skill that should be nominated because the pages are easy to read, clearly labeled, desribes the advantages and disadvantages of moving a house to a house portal location, is VERY challenging and money-consuming, and allows the player to 'show off' various items around the house. It can also benefit the player in several ways, such as free haircuts, hair colors, and clothes. It also allows people to have meetings or parties in their house, which can be useful for clans, and, if a player is a superior at construction, they can build a dungeon under their house with monsters to defeat and traps to avoid. And construction can allow you to challange(and kill)other players, either in a combat ring, or in a dungeon. Overall, despite the fact that construction has various faults and disadvantages, I feel that it should be a skill worth nominating.--Pkthis 18:38, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Oppose: I would have supported this if there were more images. Right now it looks like a boring page with a lot of reading. (I like reading, but other people might not) If there were more images, the article would be more engaging to the reader. Oddlyoko talk 20:24, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Neutral - What Odd said, but I think it is very awesome informationwise. Dragon medium helm! Whaddaya know?Chiafriend12Better than rune!Loon is best buttlord 02:15, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Sorry, although it does have some good and useful information, it's missing tons of things that need to be added, pictures only being a small portion of it all. It's a good page, but not good enough to be Featured. Constitution TIRRIANGANT (TALK) 18:32, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Support I like this page, and I pretty much agree with Pkthis. It should have more images. But I really think it's OK to be nominated. P.S. I'm a free player and I'm becoming a member and can't wait to build my own house. So I'm just saying that I'ts also fun to do this in the game (I think). R Y N O Of L

September[edit source]

Article of the month: Falador

Barrows[edit source]

Support: 9

Oppose: 1

Neutral: 1

Support as nominator Ice 21:50, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Support, it's well written. Chicken7 07:31, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Support King Black Dragon.png This dude is evil King Black Dragon.png like hellKorak 08:11, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Support It's the barrows. It's helpful (even to those who Ahrim can one-hit) Fish

Support Awesome guide and as a barrower, I feel it will help many people grow rich. Last month's nomSnator. Ssj metroid 16:12, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Support very well written and has nice info on all the barrow bros--Kohora 16:53, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Support very good article. General me 23:36, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Not this month very good article though we just had another minigame. --Whiplash 14:09, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Per above. User page "Katshuma" Talk page 08:44, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Support per nomination. Very well-written. Earthere 00:47, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Invalid for now, after a few months maybe.68.192.12.173 01:13, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

You have to be a registered member with about 50+ edits. Sorry. Earthere 20:02, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Support I fully support this nomination, not just because I am one of the major contributors to the article, but I think it has really inproved recently and become a lot more readable. (I won't of course say it is well written, as I am biased, I do think it is though ;-).) Plenty of information, and actually a useable easy to read guide, many of my freinds happily refer to this now instead of other fan sites. Green partyhat.png Bob2006ty(RUNESTORM333)  talk Green partyhat.png

Falador[edit source]

Support: 5

Oppose: 0

Neutral: 0

A very comprehensive article with plenty of pictures and writing that anyone could understand. --Sαcrε (edit my sig) | (edit my user page) 08:25, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Support Pretty good compared to other city articles. --Jigo22 00:51, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Support User page "Katshuma" Talk page 08:48, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Support More detailed than most city guides. :-) --ChelseaFan528 11:44, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Support Really good and some good animations too. --Chef's hat.png Altarius95 The Master Cook! Talk to me Cooking cape (t).png22:07, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Surok Magis[edit source]

Support: 3

Oppose:

We have nominated articles from just about every section of the wiki except the NPC area. This is probally our best NPC article, informative has a few pictures and quotes. Mabey not the longest of articles but still well done overall. --Whiplash 15:10, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Support User page "Katshuma" Talk page 08:50, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Support I wrote some of that article myself. King Black Dragon.png This dude is evil King Black Dragon.png like hellKorak 09:52, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Lletya[edit source]

Support: 5

Oppose: 0

Neutral: 1

I know that I'm nominating an article I pretty much made myself, which is a bit selfish, but I feel that it's informative enough to be featured. --Themurasame Hiscores 23:51, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Support I nominated this, so I guess I would support it being featured. --Themurasame Hiscores 23:54, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Support There's an awful lot of effort placed into this article that just can't go unnoticed. Bowman hat.pngTarikochi 04:42, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Support: It's very informative and I found out alot. I didn't no Lletya had a gate. Chicken7 >talk 04:50, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Soft Support - VERY informative, but cramped with images. On my computor some parts of the article has no room for text. Dragon medium helm! Whaddaya know?Chiafriend12Better than rune!I have 12 friends. 04:54, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

That's what I thought. It's a bit messy and they're all crammed in together. Maybe some could be removed. Chicken7 >talk 05:10, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Well if you think some should be removed, do so, or you could just add information to make it less crammed, if you have information to add, that is. Dragon medium helm! Whaddaya know?Chiafriend12Better than rune!I have 12 friends. 05:17, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
I don't. I've never set foot past Arandar. lol Chicken7 >talk 05:19, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
I can't even get to Arandar! Lol, too bad for me. Dragon medium helm! Whaddaya know?Chiafriend12Better than rune!I have 12 friends. 05:27, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
You're right, I'll try to make it cleaner. --Themurasame Hiscores 21:23, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Support Scythe.png Atlandy 21:34, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Neutral A bit messy. User page "Katshuma" Talk page 08:53, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

October[edit source]

Article of the month: Lunar Spells

Main Page[edit source]

It is well organized, probably the most viewed page, and the one page we will not delete. Dragon medium helm! Whaddaya know?Chiafriend12Better than rune!Loon is best buttlord 20:23, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Support: 1

Neutral/Pending: 0

Oppose: 7

OMFG LETS FEATURE THE MAIN PAGE ON THE MAIN PAGE!!!!!!!!!!! Oppose. --Whiplash 20:27, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

That just doesn't seem right...Oppose. 100% made by monkeys. talk|editcount20:46, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

You guys aren't even giving good reasons :(...Dragon medium helm! Whaddaya know?Chiafriend12Better than rune!Loon is best buttlord 20:51, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Kinda, yeah... I mean, featuring the main page on the main page feels would be kinda wrong, as almost everyone sees it as they go to RSwiki. Also, IMO, AotM's should be RuneScape related, because otherwise we start falling down a slippry slope and soon we have User pages as FA's. Oppose =( Sysop crown.svgTes FanSysop crown.svg 20:56, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Oppose The reason to oppose isn't because of the content of the article, but because of a technicality on the fact that if you attempt to link a page to itself, it will display the link as a non-linked bolded text instead.

Example: RuneScape:Requested featured articles Bowman hat.pngTarikochi 22:15, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Oppose... I don't think I've ever opposed anything up until now, but this is pushing it. Think from the perspective of the general reader. What's the point of seeing a page you're already on featured? Seems just like a petty novelty to me. --Themurasame Hiscores 22:22, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Comment: Tari, if you go to see this month's featured article you'll see that Falador is bolded, and not linked. I don't see how that's a reason to oppose. Dragon medium helm! Whaddaya know?Chiafriend12Better than rune!Loon is best buttlord 22:36, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Assuming that the Main Page article wins, that Read more.... would end up being Read more... since it'd be on the same page it's showing the featured winner. Do note the previous example I used is using the [[ ]] tags. Bowman hat.pngTarikochi 22:46, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Oh, the "read more....". We can always do [[Main page|Read more....]] which will end up being Read more..... Dragon medium helm! Whaddaya know?Chiafriend12Better than rune!Loon is best buttlord 05:05, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Wiki-link to this project page. - The tag for what was just done was [[RuneScape:Requested featured articles|Wiki-link to this project page.]]. This is it not working, so doing that will not work on the main page where the link to featured articles would be placed at. Bowman hat.pngTarikochi 21:13, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
lmao whip is right. It would be just stupid to feature the main page on the main page. Im going to have to oppose. King Black Dragon.png This dude is evil King Black Dragon.png like hell
Oppose. This is totally unnessary; it has NOTHING to do with RuneScape, and even if it did, it'd be about RUNESCAPE'S main page. Not RuneScape WIKI'S main page. Yes, we won't delete it, but does a page not being deleted constitute to good information? If this is nominated, I'm sure that the next thing nominated will be this. Sorry, Chia, but I really have to oppose this. 7kyt1iT.gif --WINE OF GOOD HEALTH (Actually Stinko)
Comment - The CVU can't be featured because that's not an article. Dragon medium helm! Whaddaya know?Chiafriend12Better than rune!Loon is best buttlord 19:53, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Neither is the Main Page...7kyt1iT.gif --WINE OF GOOD HEALTH (Actually Stinko) Stinkowing 00:20, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
It is, since it's in the mainspace. If it was "RuneScape:Main Page" then I wouldn't have nominated it. Dragon medium helm! Whaddaya know?Chiafriend12Better than rune!Loon is best buttlord 00:25, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

DISQUALIFIED

Yes Chia, we won't delete it. Yes it's well organized. But you've completely missed the purpose of AotM. We're trying to display a good example of a high-quality page, so that visitors will view it and not only see a great page, but see how good our content can be. If they're on the main page, they've already seen it. Featuring it would be completely redundant. I would've thought that this was a joke if you didn't seem so passionate about it. Try it on Uncyclopedia. You'll get a laugh, at least. Slayer-icon.png Gangsterls Divination-icon.png talk01:50, 5 September 2007 (UTC)


It is a good example of a high-quality page. -.- Dragon medium helm! Whaddaya know?Chiafriend12Better than rune!Loon is best buttlord 02:20, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Look at it this way Chia the main page is featured every month as it is the page everyone sees as soon as they log in. --Whiplash 15:39, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Chia, let me spell it out for you. As far as I know, you can't link to the page you are on. It turns bold instead.

Runescape:Requested featured articles is the result of [[Runescape:Requested featured articles]]. --Mura 23:52, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Yes, but if you put a redirect to RuneScape:Requested featured articles as a link on RuneScape:Requestes featured articles it will be a hyperlink. Dragon medium helm! Whaddaya know?Chiafriend12Better than rune!Loon is best buttlord 23:57, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

lolz. May be coloured blue in the near future.earth(t)

Agility[edit source]

It has loads of info and pictures, and it is lengthy too. I think it should be Article of t3h Month. 100% made by monkeys. talk|editcount20:48, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Support: 2

Neutral/Pending: 1

Oppose: 0


Neutral - All the templates and images crowd up the screen on my computor. Otherwise, good article. Dragon medium helm! Whaddaya know?Chiafriend12Better than rune!I have 12 friends. 20:51, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Strong Support - Biased because I love agility (currently 74). =P Great article though. May be coloured blue in the near future.earth(t)

support its a great article and lunor majic is more about a lot of pictures then info and agility has both--74.36.99.66 23:33, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

IPs can't vote. :( Dragon medium helm! Whaddaya know?Chiafriend12Better than rune!I have 12 friends. 23:37, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Support Re-viewed looks good. Whiplash 22:53, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Lunar Spells[edit source]

It's a change for those interested in the use of unique Spells, and there is a consistent animated image for nearly every one of them in the individual Spell pages. That and the fact that I'm in nearly all of the animated Spell images. Bowman hat.pngTarikochi 21:01, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Support: 8

Neutral/Pending:

Oppose: 1


Support Nice table and nice animations. Also, if I was new Rswiki and RuneScape, it would seem like a really cool page to check out. Sysop crown.svgTes FanSysop crown.svg 21:04, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Neutral - Like with Agility, it seems crowded. Dragon medium helm! Whaddaya know?Chiafriend12Better than rune!I have 12 friends. 21:07, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Support - Has lots of pretty pictures, and is very informative, though I do agree that the pictures are a bit cramped. --Themurasame Hiscores 22:22, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Support It showcases some of the wiki's great animated picsScythe.png Atlandy 01:28, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Support - Many people would be very interested in Lunar spells, as it would give them good reasons to train magic higher. Onyx necklace.pngDoomedrusher|Talk||Contributions|Third age kiteshield.png 15:49, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Support Just had to--Runecrafting-icon.pngDerial(Boywithbrain) Defence-icon.png 14:57, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Kind of a short article though that dosen't matter. I would probally switch to support if you can fix the images up a little they look like they're clogging up the page. --Whiplash 11:14, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Support looks better now that it has been cleaned up. Whiplash 22:59, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Sure, it's got animations and details... But if one of the main reasons is simply because you're in the animations, then I kind of see that as arrogant. No offense meant and if I get banned because of that, then nothing I can do. Cool Spy0 05:45, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

That's not the main reason for it. The reason it was nom'ed is because it's a good article. Sysop crown.svgTesFanSysop crown.svg 22:40, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Didn't sound like it. "That and the fact that I'm in nearly all of the animated Spell images." sounds more like a quick, futile grab for fame rather than an actual nomination. Cool Spy0 23:51, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
She's in the Prayer and Agility pages too, but she didn't support them. Also, 7 other people voted because the page was good, not because Tari was in it =. Sysop crown.svgTes FanSysop crown.svg 00:03, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
I see this is getting nowhere. My lack of support remains the same however. I'm not trying for Combat room to a main page article because I'm in it. Anyway, I'm not going to continue this because I'll probably end up getting in trouble for flaming a user. Cool Spy0`
Good idea. You are, after all, entitled to your opinion. Sysop crown.svgTes FanSysop crown.svg 00:44, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Not quite Support. Almost though - Not as cluttered as when I originally voted. Do not mean to be picky, but there is a whole lot of "you", "then you can", "puts you"-type sentences in it. Dragon medium helm! Whaddaya know?Chiafriend12Better than rune!I have 12 friends. 07:40, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

All the instances of "you" have been removed =) Sysop crown.svgTes FanSysop crown.svg
SUPPORT then! Dragon medium helm! Whaddaya know?Chiafriend12Better than rune!I have 12 friends. 19:58, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Support: Looks great with all the of the animations and the runes table. ChristineTalk 22:51, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Prayer[edit source]

Good article, has pictures, lengthy and worth reading.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Icecube022 (talk).

Support: 5

Neutral/Pending: 1

Oppose: 0


SUPPORT - Lengthy, filled with information, not cramped with images, and has a nice colored table with all the prayers. Dragon medium helm! Whaddaya know?Chiafriend12Better than rune!Loon is best buttlord 01:48, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

support ^_^ It's goodies. Syugecinspam 23:00, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Support - great aesthetics, one of our best skill articles. Slayer-icon.png Gangsterls Divination-icon.png talk02:20, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Support. Looks good. --Wowbagger421 00:06, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Support Cool Spy0 20:39, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Support well done article. Whiplash 22:53, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Neutral: I think the last two sections (Trivia and Random events) could use a clean-up. Tables would probably work nice for the majority of text in the Trivia section. ChristineTalk 23:04, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Woodcutting[edit source]

Maybe one of the longest and with more pictures skill article, it really deserves it--Woodcutting-icon.pngJigo22Rune battleaxe.pngHave A Nice Day!!!Yay! 04:33, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Support: 2

Neutral/Pending: 1

Oppose: 0


Support as nominator--Woodcutting-icon.pngJigo22Rune battleaxe.pngHave A Nice Day!!!Yay! 04:33, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

NEUTRAL - No necessary reason to oppose, nor support. Dragon medium helm! Whaddaya know?Chiafriend12Better than rune!I have 12 friends. 05:17, 16 September 2007 (UTC) updating vote Support-Great info and also tells about the Woodcutting macros. BURN ALL MACROS!!!!!!!!!Chef's hat.png Altarius95 The Master Cook! Talk to me Cooking cape (t).png

Oppose - Just dosen't strike me as particularly good. Whiplash 22:53, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Barrows[edit source]

Support: 1

Oppose: 0

Neutral: 0

Support I fully support this nomination, not just because I am one of the major contributors to the article, but I think it has really inproved recently and become a lot more readable. (I won't of course say it is well written, as I am biased, I do think it is though ;-).) Plenty of information, and actually a useable easy to read guide, many of my freinds happily refer to this now instead of other fan sites. Green partyhat.png Bob2006ty(RUNESTORM333)  talk Green partyhat.png

Oppose big edit dispute right now we don't wany an AOTM with an edit dispute. Whiplash 22:53, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

November[edit source]

Article of the month: Barrows

Player dictionary[edit source]

Support: 1

Neutral/Pending: 0

Oppose: 7


Very lengthy, has a "Heckuvva'lot" of phrases, and from what I see, is nearly complete. Dragon medium helm! Whaddaya know?Chiafriend12Better than rune!Loon is best buttlord 06:33, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Support as nominator. Dragon medium helm! Whaddaya know?Chiafriend12Better than rune!Loon is best buttlord 06:33, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Oppose --Themurasame Hiscores 06:46, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Oppose A bunch of words Scythe.png Atlandy 18:56, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Oppose ... User page "Katshuma" Talk page 06:43, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Oppose - what Katshuma said. ChristineTalk 16:28, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Idk how it is even an article, more like a reference page. Cashman286 talk 17:01, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Oppose-- Sorry, but it isnt even something about RuneScape itself, i can go and say those words in another game, so i think it doesnt deserves it, no offence(at least this is better than nominating the Main Page...), its just a constructive comment, this should even go in The Leet Wiki.Enough.--A beautiful Willow treeJigo22Gimme T3h Power!!!Have A Nice Day!!!Yay! 02:32, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Oppose O_o These featured article requests are spooking me. Syugecinspam 22:53, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Opposetoo many bad words. still tryin to get it censored though Chef's hat.png Altarius95 The Master Cook! Talk to me Cooking cape (t).png

Skills[edit source]

We keep featuring skill articles, so why not feature the skills article itself? It's clean, crisp, and has a nice layout. Slayer-icon.png Gangsterls Divination-icon.png talk02:45, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Support: 2

Neutral/Pending: 0

Oppose: 0


Support as nominator. Slayer-icon.png Gangsterls Divination-icon.png talk02:45, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Support I'm with Gangsterls on this one it's better than most pages on the wiki, yet is rarely looked at Rune crossbow.pngTawn21 TalkDragon scimitar old.png 09:19, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Barrows[edit source]

Temporary archive

Sadly, months ago when Barrows was first nominated, it slipped past that an IP had voted, making the vote total equal to Falador. Falador "mysteriously" got featured instead of Barrows, lol. Barrows is a well-written guide. Give it the recognition it deserves by supporting this nomination. May be coloured blue in the near future.earth(t)

Support: 5

Neutral/Pending: 0

Oppose: 0


Support--Dragon full helm.pngWorld 38!!!Dragon 2h sword old.pngAny questions? 18:55, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Support--Hard to decide between this and Agility, but I think that Barrows deserves it more. --Themurasame Hiscores 07:35, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Supporty Can't pick, but this is nice. Syugecinspam 22:53, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Support General me 23:28, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Support Cool Spy0 03:22, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Agility[edit source]

This article is very helpful to me and a few others, has good info about all the obstacles in every arena, and is pretty much packed with info. Cashman286 talk 16:02, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Support: 2

Neutral/Pending: 0

Oppose: 1


Support-- --Glass of water 21:28, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Oppose The presentation (maps, images etc.) needs work. May be coloured blue in the near future.earth(t)

December[edit source]

Article of the month: Fairy ring

[[Combatants in the God Wars]][edit source]

Support - 2

Neutral/Pending - 1

Oppose - 1

Support as nominator. (Also, sorry if I haven't done this right, not nominated before, I checked the history of the article and such to try and conform with the style of previous months) Khalron 21:11, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Neutral - Lacks images, but sure does contain a lot of information. Dragon medium helm! Whaddaya know?Chiafriend12Better than rune!I have 12 friends. 21:17, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Oppose- it's good, but its too cluttered. And yes Chiafriend, it does need pics Chef's hat.png Altarius95 The Master Cook! Talk to me Cooking cape (t).png

Support - I'd love to see something more historical featured. The article was recently seperated from the God Wars article, which has caused some issues. There aren't many pictures, unfortunately, because most of them are on the God Wars article. I don't like that they were seperated in the first place. Morian Smith 22:35, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Fairy ring[edit source]

A well-written article which is a useful reference for anyone trying to get around using the fairy rings. All the codes are organized in a chart and there is an animation of a player teleporting using a fairy ring, and another picture. The only minor flaw I've seen which could be fixed is the format of the single tip on the page (use the ignore list to store frequently used codes), which is listed as a bullet under a bolded "Tip". Also, the animation is a little grainy. Overall it's a very solid article. Slayer-icon.png Gangsterls Divination-icon.png talk03:23, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Support: 6

Neutral/Pending: 0

Oppose: 0


Support as nominator. Slayer-icon.png Gangsterls Divination-icon.png talk03:23, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Support, unless a better article is nominated later on. I still have the original recording for the animation, and I can save it so it looks cleaner. I prefer the grainy look, though. --Themurasame Hiscores 04:14, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Support - Dragon chainbody.pngEmosSysop crown.svg 20:58, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Support Redekopmark 22:10, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Support ExpensiveNick Advent 02:22, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Support Lexmarkmantalk  22:37, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Smithing[edit source]

After editing it a while, it now meets pretty much all of the criteria and the style guide, except for some minor image issues. The featured article template link wouldn't work, so I just posted this against steps 2-4 on this page. Sorry about that.Butterman62Ice Barrage.png 03:06, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Support: 2

Neutral/Pending: 0

Oppose: 0


Support as nominator. Butterman62Ice Barrage.png 03:06, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Weak Support - Could use more images, but is still very helpful for smithing (something I plan on training). May be coloured blue in the near future.earth(t)

Brimhaven Agility Arena[edit source]

This article was written mostly by VimesCarrot. It's long, but not too long, very informative, and has many pictures showing obstacles with information on each one. Overall, a good job and an article that begs to be Article of the Month. Cool Spy0 18:30, 19 November 2007 (UTC)


Support: 1

Neutral/Pending: 0

Oppose: 0

Support as nominator. Cool Spy0 18:30, 19 November 2007 (UTC)