Forum:What image formats are permitted

From the RuneScape Wiki, the wiki for all things RuneScape
Jump to: navigation, search
Forums: Yew Grove > What image formats are permitted
Archive
This page or section is an archive.
Please do not edit the contents of this page.
This thread was archived on 21 January 2011 by Aburnett.

Introduction

I think that only .png, .svg, and .gif (sparingly) image formats should be permitted. As some of you have seen, in the category:JPEG images page, there are hundreds of pictures. It is a total waste of time to replace those .jpg and .bmp images. And also, look at the [[:category:Dithered images]] page. I think that .gif should only be used on small/don't need much detail images. Maybe when you upload .gifs there should be a size restriction or something like that. Along with this presposal, I think there should be a template saying that images are low quality. If you look in the categories listed above, some of those images ARE .pngs, they're just low quality.Defence-icon.png99 i fail Attack-icon.png 22:15, January 18, 2011 (UTC)

Positions

Support- agree COMPLETELY with what a said above.

Partial support- like what I said, but some things should be changed.

Oppose- entirely disagree with what I said.

Comment- not supporting any side. please consider the difference between this and partial support.

Discussion

Support- As the proposer.Defence-icon.png99 i fail Attack-icon.png 22:15, January 18, 2011 (UTC)

Unofficially, at least, this is already the status quo. .png is the dominant format, and .jpg and non-animated .gif images tend to be replaced with better .png versions. You can use templates like {{jpeg}} to mark images that need to be replaced. --Andorin (Talk) (Contribs) 22:21, January 18, 2011 (UTC)

However, I'm against a complete ban on .jpg images, per Zamorak. --Andorin (Talk) (Contribs) 22:26, January 18, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose - We prefer images of the .png format, however a JPEG is better then no picture at all. svco4bY.png3Gf5N2F.png 22:23, January 18, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose - And we know how voting works. JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 22:25, January 18, 2011 (UTC)

LOLWUT? - We don't allow .bmp (system won't allow), there is nothing wrong with .png (16mil+ colours, trans, lossless compression), .gif only allows 256 colours but we use for animated, .jpg are just plain ugly and can not have trans. Full Slayer Helmet! Evil1888 Talk A's L Dragon Platebody! 22:28, January 18, 2011 (UTC)

Reading... I make no sense. Full Slayer Helmet! Evil1888 Talk A's L Dragon Platebody! 00:19, January 20, 2011 (UTC)

Comment- I'm not against .gif, but it should be used sparingly.Defence-icon.png99 i fail Attack-icon.png 22:32, January 18, 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, for only animated .gif. Things 'not needing much detail' should still be uploaded as a .png as it's usually a small mouse move away. Full Slayer Helmet! Evil1888 Talk A's L Dragon Platebody! 22:35, January 18, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose - There are legitimate reasons for using JPEG, GIF and various other file extensions. Jagex usually releases imagery in JPEG to reduce the size of the image and it's usually not a fantastic idea to convert them into PNG's. GIF's are used frequently for animations, while APNG's are still support in relatively few browsers, until it has more support, GIF animations will still be used. Let us not forget Ogg Vorbis and MID/MIDI files for sound bytes, 30 second clips, and sometimes a rare video from Jagex. Then we look into that we accept database file types such as ODS and ODT. There is never a reason for limiting what files types are to be accepted to a Wiki without good reasoning. Ryan PM 17:16, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose - Per Ryan. bad_fetustalk 19:43, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose - Per the god of animation. Real Nub 21:41, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose - No reason to completely ban JPGs. As other people have said any image is better than no image, no matter what the file type. Dragon 2h sword old.pngCallofduty4 Talk 21:45, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

Strong Oppose - RS:IMP is in place for a reason. — Enigma 00:02, January 20, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose - PNGs are obviously what we want for most images, but there's absolutely no reason to delete JPGs or dithered images just because of their file format. ʞooɔ 00:18, January 20, 2011 (UTC)

Oppose - Yeah, Jpgs aren't the best quality, but if it's the only image of a subject, is it not better than no image? Gifs, as said above, is best for animations as more browsers can view it. So, outright banning a filetype isn't the best choice. The best we can do is just keep on tagging and replacing the images. ~MuzTalk 01:08, January 20, 2011 (UTC)

Closed - Withdrawn by proposer. --Aburnett(Talk) 23:27, January 21, 2011 (UTC)