Forum:Temporarily block Elune Anzu, Thebrains222, Sentra246, and Cook Me Plox

From the RuneScape Wiki, the wiki for all things RuneScape
Jump to: navigation, search
Forums: Yew Grove > Temporarily block Elune Anzu, Thebrains222, Sentra246, and Cook Me Plox
Archive
This page or section is an archive.
Please do not edit the contents of this page.
This thread was archived on 24 October 2012 by Urbancowgurl777.

Elune, Thebrains222, Cook Me Plox, and Sentra246 have been vandalizing User:Liquidhelium, in direct violation of RS:DEU, and in addition, quoting policies at me despite the policies specifically allowing the reversion of vandalism. Cook has even gone so far as to protect the page, with all its vandalism, to prevent the reversion of his reversion of the reversion of vandalism, a direct violation of RS:PROTECT. For these reasons, I feel that they should be temporarily blocked, Cook for a minimum of 1 week, and the others for shorter amounts of time. I want to make something very clear. I am serious about this thread. It is not a joke, it is not meant to be funny. If your comment was not meant to be serious, please <del> it. Michagogo (talk) 11:14, October 24, 2012 (UTC)

Discussion

Support - as nominator. Michagogo (talk) 10:05, October 24, 2012 (UTC)

Comment - I lol'ed. WgvxeSr.png - frouZAC.png 10:07, October 24, 2012 (UTC)

Support - Elune Anzu, Thebrains222, Sentra246, and Cook Me Plox are a serious threat to the wiki. 222 talk 10:08, October 24, 2012 (UTC)

Support - dey gon 2 far dey mus b ban Korasi's sword.png Archmage Elune  TalkHS Void knight deflector.png fetus is my son and I love him. 10:11, October 24, 2012 (UTC)


Super strong support - While we're at it, let's have them permablocked and stripped of all powers. Bad Cook, denying others the right to have fun. And while we're at it, let's take away their cookies too. Bad admins don't deserve cookies What I've done Ciphrius Kane Talk 10:12, October 24, 2012 (UTC)

Don't you think an indefinite block is a little harsh? Vandalism is not something to laugh about, but I think you're overreacting. As for their powers, I don't feel there's a need to remove them unless Cook, Brains, and Sentra use them to get around the block. Michagogo (talk) 10:14, October 24, 2012 (UTC)
But they're cyberterrorists! And the best thing to do with terrorists is complete overkill then claim that they were hiding behind their wife/sister/mother/daughter/other What I've done Ciphrius Kane Talk 10:19, October 24, 2012 (UTC)
You can propose an indefinite block if you want, but I am opposed to it. Michagogo (talk) 10:20, October 24, 2012 (UTC)
Ok let's go for it baby! What I've done Ciphrius Kane Talk 10:22, OSUctober 24, 2012 (UTC)
I understand you are opposed, but it is something that HAS to be done, if we don't take them out, they will take bomb they will invade and take out the main internets, and we CAN'T have that happen! WgvxeSr.png - frouZAC.png 10:28, October 24, 2012 (UTC)

Strong support - We put this wiki at great peril by not blocking Cook Me Plox. The others I don't care about, but Cook Me Plox has GOT TO GO. ʞooɔ 10:14, October 24, 2012 (UTC)

Indescribable support fur Cook - That guy needs banhammarz quick WgvxeSr.png - frouZAC.png 10:19, October 24, 2012 (UTC)
He's the head terrorist! Block him quick! What I've done Ciphrius Kane Talk 10:22, October 24, 2012 (UTC)
Support not blocking the said vandles who vandled the unblocked user stated prior above - I strongly oppose not blocking the said vandles who vandled the unblocked user stated prior above. Just my two cents. Raglough (talk) 10:41, October 24, 2012 (UTC)
I assure you that my comments were commented in the most serious of natures commentable. Raglough (talk) 10:46, October 24, 2012 (UTC)
I agree - Let's block Liquid while we're at it too What I've done Ciphrius Kane Talk 10:45, October 24, 2012 (UTC)

Overload (4).png - Banhammers please. cqm 10:49 • 24/10/2012 (UTC) (UTC)

Being serious here Oppose - Silliness. Please Michagogo, take a joke and stop reacting to this so much. Even if they were wrong mistakes, temporarily blocking them is not the answer. HaidroH rune.pngEagle feather 3.pngCandle (blood red).png 1XqyDNM.png Crystal triskelion fragment 3.pngHazelmere's signet ring.png 10:58, October 24, 2012 (UTC)

Haidro, we tried that already lol. 222 talk 10:59, October 24, 2012 (UTC)
Michagogo is obviously not getting the point. HaidroH rune.pngEagle feather 3.pngCandle (blood red).png 1XqyDNM.png Crystal triskelion fragment 3.pngHazelmere's signet ring.png 11:01, October 24, 2012 (UTC)
Vandalism is not funny. I've said this over and over, in both IRC and S:C, and the vandalism has continued, to the point of protecting to prevent reversion of vandalism -- and I strongly believe that this is unacceptable. It's not a joke, it's not amusing. Michagogo (talk) 11:09, October 24, 2012 (UTC)


Question - Wait, has everyone been joking about their support? Michagogo (talk) 11:09, October 24, 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, but:

uBC5H.png

HaidroH rune.pngEagle feather 3.pngCandle (blood red).png 1XqyDNM.png Crystal triskelion fragment 3.pngHazelmere's signet ring.png 11:11, October 24, 2012 (UTC)

yeah... cqm 11:12 • 24/10/2012 (UTC) (UTC)
I actually support the terrorists and actively fund Cook Me Plox's activities. I'd lose millions if he went down What I've done Ciphrius Kane Talk 11:14, October 24, 2012 (UTC)
I'm confused... are we allowed to strikethrough the entire forum so far? cqm 11:17 • 24/10/2012 (UTC) (UTC)
Still support - ʞooɔ 11:23, October 24, 2012 (UTC)
Also still Support - they naughty monkeys, ban them. Korasi's sword.png Archmage Elune  TalkHS Void knight deflector.png fetus is my son and I love him. 11:32, October 24, 2012 (UTC)
Support is ongoing as well - They have been naughty, they must be punished What I've done Ciphrius Kane Talk 11:33, October 24, 2012 (UTC)

Comment - Michagogo, no matter how serious you want to make this thread, it won't be. Firstly, no one is, and will, be taking this serious, because they are all taking it a joke. And secondly, this is a joke. How could you even think of this? It's just a silly act on someone's user page that will eventually be removed. This is just pointless, and I hope you withdraw your statements in blocking them. Seriously, get some sense of humour. HaidroH rune.pngEagle feather 3.pngCandle (blood red).png 1XqyDNM.png Crystal triskelion fragment 3.pngHazelmere's signet ring.png 11:51, October 24, 2012 (UTC)

I'm starting to see that. It's just that when people start vandalizing other people's userpages, to the point of protecting the page so it becomes unfixable, I honestly cannot understand why anybody would find it funny. An edit or two, maybe. But this? I don't get it. I really don't get it. I'll be taking a break from the wiki for a while, I think.
This request for closure is complete A user has requested closure for Temporarily block Elune Anzu, Thebrains222, Sentra246, and Cook Me Plox. Request complete. The reason given was: It's clear that this isn't being taken seriously. No point in continuing.

Michagogo (talk) 12:10, October 24, 2012 (UTC)

Comment - So much for the seriousness of Yew Grove threads... Next on the agenda? Hog for pres. RSN: Warthog Rhys Talk Completionist's cape... Coming soon. 12:12, October 24, 2012 (UTC)

Closed - Nominator withdrawal. sssSp7p.pngIjLCqFF.png 13:25, October 24, 2012 (UTC)