Forum:So are pendants F2P or members? (Edit wars and ignored talk page discussions.)

From the RuneScape Wiki, the wiki for all things RuneScape
Jump to: navigation, search
Forums: Yew Grove > So are pendants F2P or members? (Edit wars and ignored talk page discussions.)
This page or section is an archive.
Please do not edit the contents of this page.
This thread was archived on 17 October 2012 by Spineweilder.


3ICE here, writing a long winded post about something that has been bugging me for a while, as I kill 400 Catablepons.

My pendants and depleted pendants are members only yet most if not all the wiki pages say they are F2P. What gives?

Depleted pendant:

Pendant of Cooking:

  • Members [4] here we have an IP attempt to change it to P2P,
  • Free [5] then User:The Mol Man, an editor I respect and consider an authority reverts it, saying "is not".
  • Members [6] which gets changed back to members,
  • Void [7] gets lowercased,
  • Free [8] then self-reverted: "Hmm... history page says it isn't... vandalism?"

Pendant of Attack:

  • Members [9] members=Yes ...
  • Free [10] gets undone.

Pendant of Mining:

  • Members [11] IP: "updated memb status"
  • Free [12] revert by User:Coelacanth0794: "Unless someone can check". (I like this guy, he doesn't immediately discredit the change, he is suspicious instead.)

Pendant of Smithing:

  • Members [13] IP says "y"
  • Free [14] article currently says otherwise.

Pendant of Runecrafting:

  • Members [15] members=yes,
  • Free [16] members=no

Prized pendant of Fletching, Prized pendant of Construction, Prized pendant of Agility, etc:

  • Free [17] These pages...
  • Members [18] were all created...
  • Free [19] as f2p,
  • Members [20] but changed...
  • Free [21] to members...
  • Members [22] soon after.

Pendant of Dungeoneering:

  • Members [23] "see talk"
  • Members [24] requesting confirmation on talk page ("Can anyone confirm that these are in fact available for free-to-play?")
  • Members [25] and getting it
  • Free [26] But the article is reverted a few weeks later anyway

Pendant of Firemaking:

  • Members [27] IP clearly sees it as a members item and comes to help us correct the mistake
  • Free [28] Gets shut down with: "Undid revision 6036046 by (Talk) -> It's f2p"

Pendant of Defence:

  • Members [29] IP says members=yes,
  • Free [30] but "Undid revision 6020954 by ...".
  • Members [31] This time a registered member tries to get the message across...
  • Free [32] But "Undid revision 6020963 by Druid Ozver (Talk) they're not"

Pendant of Constitution:

  • Members [33] members=yes,
  • Free [34] "f2p skill, unless corrected" (Again, this guy at least considered the possibility of everyone else being wrong. Thanks for that.)

Pendant of Prayer:

  • Members [35] IP edit: members=yes,
  • Free [36] "m (Undid revision 6211702 by (Talk): Prayer is available to F2P as well)"
  • Members [37] IP users persevere! Current edit war status: winning (Will probably get reverted again though.)

Pendant of Ranging:

  • Members [38] members=yes,
  • Free [39] "m (Undid revision 6246033 by (Talk) other pendants say no...)" To which I say other pendants are also wrong.

Pendant of Magic:

  • Members [40] members=yes,
  • Free [41] "m (Undid revision 6385869 by (Talk): Magic is a non members skill though)" Now that's just a silly argument. We are talking about an item not the skill itself. With that line of thinking, Frost dragon bones should be f2p as well.

Tally: (Of course I, 3ICE, support the members-only side of this argument as I've seen them marked as such on an f2p world with my very own eyes. So +1 to members.)

  • Members 26 times.
  • Free 20 times. (Addendum: Most of them were probably misguided reverts. 3ICE (talk) 18:34, October 15, 2012 (UTC))

Shall we put an end to this argument once and for all? 3ICE (talk) 18:33, October 15, 2012 (UTC)


Can you use the pendants on members-only worlds only? (as in getting the bonus XP) Do all pendants have orange names when pointed to with the mouse in-game?

 a proofreader ▸ 

18:52, October 15, 2012 (UTC)

They're unusable, I've just confirmed. This page can be closed unless we'd like to make a few points about policy. MolMan 18:53, October 15, 2012 (UTC)

Comment - Prized pendants appear as members objects for me in f2p (On the Squeal of Fortune). I do remember getting a normal pendant of magic in F2P squeal, but I couldn't claim it. Now, maybe these items are members to obtain, but in Free-to-play worlds, can we equip these pendants? And, do we get bonus exp? If we can at least equip them, then they are F2P items. HaidroH rune.pngEagle feather 3.pngCandle (blood red).png 1XqyDNM.png Crystal triskelion fragment 3.pngHazelmere's signet ring.png 04:59, October 16, 2012 (UTC

They're members objects. All of them have the examine text "Login to a members' server to use this object." on free to play servers. Close thread plox Adventurer's log Wahisietel (Talk) Quest map icon.png 09:15, October 17, 2012 (UTC)

Closed - Please bring this discussion to talk pages. The Yew Grove is an irrelevant place to discuss this. -- Recent uploads SpineTalkGuest book 11:51, October 17, 2012 (UTC)