Forum:Replacing "Official length" in Quest details template
Official lengths for quests are used to determine roughly how long it takes for a quest to be completed. The parameters used are Short, Medium, Long, Very Long and Very, Very Long. Some even use them in between (e.x. Short to Medium), and it seems we don't actually have a set definition for them. In addition, it seems that Jagex hasn't used these for the past few years now (according to Coel).
I suggest using our own lengths in place of these outdated, obsolete and ambiguous parameters.
This thread aims to accomplish two things:
- Consensus to replace "Official length" to a satisfactory length for the average player.
- Define the satisfactory length we'll be using in place of Official lengths.
Here's some things to consider. For One Small Favour, the time completed can range from 40 minutes to over an hour, depending on the type account (regular or ironman , whether the player is space-barring everything, etc.
There's also going to be some abstract ones, with Recipe/Dimension of Disaster, Curse of the Black Stone, etc. What would be the satisfactory time to put as the length? Do we want a range, such as "40 minutes to 2 hours", or an average amount based on a number of video guides?
Support - I believe replacing official length with a satisfactory length (e.x. X minutes) put in its place, would benefit visitors to the site more than an ambiguous term. -- SpineTalk 05:18, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Oppose replacing with an unofficial estimate cf. Forum:Remove estimated time from quest guides. 05:29, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Oppose too subjective, a quester is usually aware of their own ability to do quests quickly or slowly based on their experience with varying factors such as combat encounters, we simply cannot give a good estimate that suits a majority of players.05:55, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Oppose - We had estimates, they weren't a success as per above. Additionally the official length is displayed in the quest overview screen of each and every quest as well as miniquest.09:48, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Oppose - per everyone else09:50, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Oppose - Historically data streams have shown that length can not really be determined, additionally the general quest update Mod Stu did sought to add a length in-game, every quester is different and there times will vary as such.
EDIT: Look at this data I had to present on quest completions just to show you how messy it can get  10:30, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Oppose - as a statistical outlier for quest completion times. Badassiel 11:03, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Oppose - Oppose replacing the official times for sure, I think they're important to show and have the information on etc. I am, however, not opposed to some type of average completion time as well, but as other's have mentioned it seems really hard to specify one that is of real value to anyone. In some cases I think things like level, and obviously ironman, can have a large impact on quest completion time and we'd need a way to handle that as well. A range might be a good way to handle it, from quickly doing it at high level to a regular completion time at the required levels, something like that. In short I think that it's a good idea to have them, but not to replace the official length, and the idea needs more fleshing out.08:33, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Oppose - Per others10:14, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Soft Oppose - I feel that a more exact clarification on where the lines are between current frames would be a good solution. as it stands short/medium means very little as they seem to be interchangeable. Rhysy4056 (talk) 11:50, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Support - I propose that we implement a similar system as for charm drop rates on monster pages. A user would have the option to add his own time in a form, which is then appended to a data module. On the quest page we show the 90% interval of all times rounded to 5 minutes. This wouldn't replace the official time but is displayed next to it.17:53, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
- If something like this was done, it'd be best to at least separate the fast (spacebar etc) people vs the slow ones I think. Then maybe display it as fast-slow or using a user preference etc. 01:11, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Oppose - Many of the points have already been made - people quest differently/determining accurate data would be difficult etc.22:43, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Oppose - How do you distinguish the time between someone who reads each line of the dialogue vs somebody who spacebars an entire quest? I'd think having a time range of 40 mins - 2 hours is more vague than just having the length as just long, very long etc. I think the length just gives a vague idea of how much time to put aside to get it done TzTok-Gas TM 08:21, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
Oppose - Might be late to the party, but I have to agree with everyone who is opposing. There's people that do questing differently; they don't use a guide and take hours to figure a clue out, use a guide, skip dialogue, or they take their time, ect. We can't really accurately know how long a quest is, unless one of us wait till the guide is complete, then follow the guide at a normal rate, read the dialogues, and complete it to say how long "we" took. But someone could have done it faster, ya know? I think how we have it now works better.04:46, 17 February 2020 (UTC)