Forum:RFA

From the RuneScape Wiki, the wiki for all things RuneScape
Jump to: navigation, search
Forums: Yew Grove > RFA
Archive
This page or section is an archive.
Please do not edit the contents of this page.
This thread was archived on 10 December 2008 by Diberville.

I think we need to change the title of the RuneScape:Requested featured articles to RuneScape:Articles of the Month just because of it having the same acronym as the RuneScape:Requests for adminship. What do you guys think? --Rollback crown.svg Spencer (Talk | Edits | Contribs) 17:43, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

I highly support this as I personally have already mixed these two up. RS:AOTM and RS:RFA would be much easier to remember acronym wise, and i like acronyms (when i can remember them). My theory is we only have so many keystrokes in our lifetimes and as such i want to get the most out of mine, thus my total approval of acronyms. ~kytti khat 19:30, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
Lol, interesting philosophy. I agree, but RuneScape:Requested featured users should be renamed as "User of the Month" to be consistent with article of the month. Dtm142 22:46, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
I agree with Dtm too. So, have we reached a consensus or not? --Rollback crown.svg Spencer (Talk | Edits | Contribs) 01:46, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Oh my, "RS:RFU" sounds like a Request For Undeletion. Yes, that too should be renamed to RS:UOTM otherwise people will keep wanting undelete user pages or somesuch. ~kytti khat 03:53, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
I support changing the two project pages. I wondered why they were called "requested featured" when they were usually referred to as "___ of the month". White partyhat old.png C Teng talk 02:22, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
I agree, it makes more sense to rename them "___ of the month" rather than "requested featured ___".-- 18:46, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

And done!--Diberville 18:30, 1 December 2008 (UTC)