Forum:Proposed policies

From the RuneScape Wiki, the wiki for all things RuneScape
Jump to: navigation, search
Forums: Yew Grove > Proposed policies
Archive
This page or section is an archive.
Please do not edit the contents of this page.
This thread was archived on 11 June 2011 by Haloolah123.

There's quite a few policies which were proposed and written up ready for a Yew Grove thread, but either didn't reach consensus or just disappeared. What should we do with these? At the moment, they can cause confusion as there is only a small notice at the top which points out that the policy is not in effect. There are two things we can do to remedy this:

  1. Move them to a sub-page of their respective Yew Grove thread - This means that no-one would confuse them for a policy, and they would remain in existence. If no thread exists, we could move it to a sub-page of the author's userpage.
  2. Delete them - However this would mean that history is lost and no one would know what an ancient thread is talking about.

And I almost forgot, we can ignore this and nothing about them at all. Discuss, 222 talk 00:02, May 21, 2011 (UTC)

Discussion[edit source]

Support 1 - As I am the brilliant and genius nominator. 222 talk 00:02, May 21, 2011 (UTC)

Support 1 - It makes it clearer. That would also make clear it has nothing to do with our current ideas, while it looks like we are about to propose them currently, which suggests we still think adminship is a "step up in the ranks" too. Moving them to a subpage would fix this problem. JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 00:38, May 21, 2011 (UTC)

Support 1' - Seems like the best option considering that deleting history is usually frowned upon. It would also make more sense to be a subpage of the proposal rather than in the namespace/same area of all other policies. ɳex undique 00:45, May 21, 2011 (UTC)

Support 1 - They are part of a yew grove so should be put there, policies shouldn't be put into the project namespace until they have become official policies. For any future proposed policies should also be first made as sub-pages of the discussion and then moved into the correct place if their thread passes. Hunter cape (t).png Sentra246Blue hallowe'en mask.png 02:26, May 21, 2011 (UTC)

Support 1 - Only active policies should be found in the project namespace. kitty.pngPsycho Robot talkSilver bar.png 08:41, May 21, 2011 (UTC)

Support 1 - Per nobrains. bad_fetustalk 13:52, May 21, 2011 (UTC)

Support 1 - What do you mean, Psycho? Proposed ones aren't there. User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 15:00, May 21, 2011 (UTC)

RuneScape:Requests for adminship policy --LiquidTalk 15:52, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
orly noob bad_fetustalk 15:56, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
Wow. That's dumb. User_talk:Fswe1 Fswe1 Brassica Prime symbol.png 16:23, May 22, 2011 (UTC)

Support 1 - ^Per them. Matt (t) 06:31, May 23, 2011 (UTC)

Pick #3 my lord - #3 being the first option. HaloTalk 23:49, June 3, 2011 (UTC)

I thought 3 was doing nothing. Matt (t) 04:55, June 4, 2011 (UTC)
Quick chat button.png I like your item: Shrek Reference. Korasi's sword.png Archmage Elune  TalkHS Void knight deflector.png fetus is my son and I love him. 14:26, June 4, 2011 (UTC)
Jim got the reference =D HaloTalk 15:35, June 4, 2011 (UTC)
>_> Matt (t) 00:41, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
C-c-c-combo breaker JOEYTJE50TALKpull my finger 02:11, June 5, 2011 (UTC)

#3 - Per halo Korasi's sword.png Archmage Elune  TalkHS Void knight deflector.png fetus is my son and I love him. 14:26, June 4, 2011 (UTC)

Closed - Proposed policies will be moved to a subsection of their yew grove thread, whenever I manage to find them. Or someone else does it for me. HaloTalk 23:24, June 11, 2011 (UTC)