Forum:Neutral Pictures

From the RuneScape Wiki, the wiki for all things RuneScape
Jump to: navigation, search
Forums: Yew Grove > Neutral Pictures
Archive
This page or section is an archive.
Please do not edit the contents of this page.
This thread was archived on 7 September 2009 by Calebchiam.


Hello, And I Wish to Propose A New Policy; neutral imaging. In Neutral Imaging instead of players, You should use Morphs Or Emotions to Blend in to the Picture. If a Picture is Not Neutral, and Contains a character, then it'd Be tagged. If The Image itself was Meant to contain the character, for Clothes or Special attacks Ect Then it wouldn't count --Ringmaster hat.png Celtic-Creations Talk to me Dragon hatchet.png

You're making absolutely no sense. ShinyUnown T | C | E 21:57, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Sorry; Err, I've edited it, I hope it's clearer --Ringmaster hat.png Celtic-Creations Talk to me Dragon hatchet.png 22:05, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

I'm going to have to oppose. It really doesn't matter whether or not a player is in the image. ShinyUnown T | C | E 22:08, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Okay: If You've Made Your Mind up; But Players are Like Watermarking In My Opinion; and alot of people hate Similar Costumes in images. OOps Forgot to:

Support As Nonimator --Ringmaster hat.png Celtic-Creations Talk to me Dragon hatchet.png 22:15, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Comment - Sooo... you're saying that instead of having players just standing there in an image, you want the player to be doing some sort of action? If so, why?  Tien  22:52, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

I believe he means that if the player is not the focus of the image (e.g. location images etc) then the player should be invisible or should blend in (at points in some emotes (like give thanks or around the world) the player is invisible). Obviously where the player is the focus (for emotes, worn items, etc) then this doesn't apply.
Personally I'm neutral towards this; I feel it better handled as a case-by-case basis than as a blanket rule. Quest.png Gaz Lloyd 7:^]Events!99s 22:59, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Oh, I see. In this case, I'm also neutral because I don't mind players being in a picture. Not all pictures are featured images, which I think are the only types of pictures where the player does seem to matter in them.  Tien  12:42, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Neutral - per Gaz. Andrew talk 02:39, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - Why bother? The images are fine the way they are. If it aint broke, don't fix it. — Enigma 04:31, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - This discussion has occurred three times in the past. As long as you get the point across without being overly distracting, then you can look however you choose. But mandating that characters have to look a certain way unless displaying a specific costume or armor set is overly controlling (lol...just lol at the irony.) Its only putting more work on the people who make the majority of animations to change there outfit or look default in every image. Cap and goggles.pngTEbuddy 05:27, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - It will take too much effort, and (in my opinion) end up looking worse anyway. What's the point? As TEbuddy said, this is just more unnecessary work for people like Hapi. ~ Fire Surge icon.png Sentry Telos Talk  09:04, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Neutral - Although those that upload the images in the first place should make sure not to be overly distracting in the image, I don't feel that it is important enough to make a new template to tag it. What would become the border of distracting? I feel it would be hard to regulate this. ~MuzTalk 13:50, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - This is quite subjective and depends on your perception of what is distracting. At most, if the player in the image is blatantly distracting, you could add a cleanup tag or post on the file's talkpage. C.ChiamTalk 13:57, 24 August 2009 (UTC)


Oppose- No reason for a player to be in the picture --Quest point cape equipped.png Cheese012Firemaking 01:44, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Uhm... so you support? Miasmic Blitz icon.png Hapi007 Talk! Sign! . 16:08, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Neutral - Per Gaz Lloyd. Ancient talisman.png Oil4 Talk 10:24, 28 August 2009 (UTC)