Forum:Dungeoneering Drops

From the RuneScape Wiki, the wiki for all things RuneScape
Jump to: navigation, search
Forums: Yew Grove > Dungeoneering Drops
This page or section is an archive.
Please do not edit the contents of this page.
This thread was archived on 5 July 2010 by Calebchiam.

Has anyone else noticed that the drops of most of the monsters in daemonheim are all from the same drop table? It scales up with level, and some other monsters have specific drops (like forgotten mages drop mage gear). Perhaps we should create a template with all of the known drops from this table and apply it to the Dungeoneering monsters?

Just a thought --FarxodorTalk 01:20, June 22, 2010 (UTC)


Oppose - I don't think it's worth it. As you said, it can vary depending on your level, floor, monster level, and what monster it is. It's just too random to be of use to anybody in determining drops of a specific monster. And those monsters with high chance drops (E.g. Forgotten warriors dropping armour) already have it noted on their respective pages. - [Pharos] 05:18, June 22, 2010 (UTC)

Comment, oppose for now - Well, I think the issue to consider here is the messiness of the actual dungeoneering monsters first before you think about adding the drops. Some monsters have a page for the dungeoneering-specific one, others redirect to the monster outside of Daemonheim. Farming cape (t).png Lil cloud 9 Talk 00:11, June 25, 2010 (UTC)

Neutral - We'd have to figure something out organization wise.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Teady159 (talk).

Comment/Pending - Explain in greater detail please? HaloTalk 07:13, June 25, 2010 (UTC)

Ditto, would like to hear some details. xScoobsx Talk Contribs 08:11, June 25, 2010 (UTC)

Request for closure - This isn't going anywhere, and it wouldn't really fix much. HaloTalk 20:00, June 27, 2010 (UTC)

Request for closure x2 - Per Halo. 222 talk 08:27, July 5, 2010 (UTC)

This request for closure is complete A user has requested closure for Dungeoneering Drops. Request complete. The reason given was: complete

ʞooɔ 09:17, July 5, 2010 (UTC)

Closed - No further action, proposal will not be implemented. C.ChiamTalk 12:53, July 5, 2010 (UTC)