Forum:Does AGF apply to the CC?
Me and another editor were in the cc earlier (just a few seconds ago, in fact) discussing whether or not RS:AGF applies in the cc. My argument was that AGF specifically says "The editor" and "edits", while his was that it wasn't to be taken literally. So, does or does not AGF apply in the CC? If it does, I think the wording should be changed to not be so Wiki-specific. Gone. 01:14, January 8, 2010 (UTC)
Of course. You just have to consider whether someone is trying to be helpful or an obvious troll/spammer. It should not be difficult to determine.--Degenret01 01:23, January 8, 2010 (UTC)
AGF is flawed in that it only mentions editing, not how to act on the forums/yew grove/cc (though RS:UTP does that to an extent). Now, if it does apply to the cc, an amendment should be written so that it does to whatever extent it needs to. if it does not, an amendment should still be written to cover the cc to the same extent. Whatever that is, it should cover all comments until by assuming good faith, your also refusing to treat trolling as bad faith when you know it is, nor should it stop you from questioning faith if your not sure. 01:26, January 8, 2010 (UTC)
Comment - As mentioned in the clan chat page, all rules and policies embodied by both the Game Guide/KB and the Runescape Wiki still apply to the clan chat. -- Fruit.Smoothie 05:55, January 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, we went over that in the CC. The main point is, as stated above, the page's wording implies that it only relates to editing. Gone. 18:00, January 8, 2010 (UTC)