Difference between revisions of "Forum:Augmentable property"

From the RuneScape Wiki, the wiki for all things RuneScape
Jump to: navigation, search
(Discussion)
 
Line 19: Line 19:
 
I'm not particularly a fan of a dedicated row in infobox item but its an option I suppose. {{Signatures/Gaz Lloyd}} 11:16, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 
I'm not particularly a fan of a dedicated row in infobox item but its an option I suppose. {{Signatures/Gaz Lloyd}} 11:16, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 
:'''Comment''' - Personally, I would rather see the second option of those two. I feel if we are going to add it somewhere, infobox item is the most obvious place for it to be, but it doesn't need it's own row (as my example) I just did it that way as an easy example of how it could be done. In any case, I support adding it in some form to infobox item. {{User:Myles_Prower/Signature}} 00:15, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
 
:'''Comment''' - Personally, I would rather see the second option of those two. I feel if we are going to add it somewhere, infobox item is the most obvious place for it to be, but it doesn't need it's own row (as my example) I just did it that way as an easy example of how it could be done. In any case, I support adding it in some form to infobox item. {{User:Myles_Prower/Signature}} 00:15, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
  +
  +
'''Oppose/comment''' - Unnecessary on the infobox, I think it would make it a bit crowded. Others have mentioned that all augmentable items should have redirect at the top of the article - I believe it should also be mentioned in the opening section somewhere - if not then that's something we can go about adding. {{Signatures/Superiosity}} 02:54, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 02:54, 5 February 2019

Forums: Yew Grove > Augmentable property

With the new mining and smithing rework it is not clear for me which armour and weapons is augmentable. A small suggestion: An extra property for armour and weapons -> augmentable: yes/no.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by The murda (talk) on 01:51,19 January 2019.

Discussion[edit source]

Comment - Don't basically all augmentable items link their augmented version right at the top of the page anyway? -Hourglass (2011 Hallowe'en event) detail.png I Am Me Talk III The Spark.png- 02:25, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Comment - I also found it confusing at first, even before the M&S rework. But as stated above, all items that can be augmented, should have links on the top of the page. There is also Category:Augmentable items. As soon as someone finds out where to find the information, having augmentable: yes/no would feel obsolete. I am not opposed to adding it to the infoboxes, but I am also not sure if it would really make a big difference in terms of clarity. Attamaris (talk) 11:07, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Comment - I'd also say it's not really necessary to add it to the infobox. Not only is there the category but the Augmentation page has a list broken up by tier and slot (it uses dpl to load it from the category). Seers headband 2 chathead.png Elessar2 (talk) 20:17, 19 January 2019

Support - As mentioned by users above, this information is available by other means. However, I can see where having it in the infobox could be beneficial. As an example of what this might look like, see this example using a sandboxed copy of the template/module.  RS AdvLogMyles Prower  Talk 03:31, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Comment - I would suggest one of the following:

  • Addition to infobox bonuses (since infobox bonuses already tracks drain rate for augmented items)
  • Addition to infobox item - sharing the cell with disassembly

I'm not particularly a fan of a dedicated row in infobox item but its an option I suppose. Quest.png Gaz Lloyd 7:^]Events!99s 11:16, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Comment - Personally, I would rather see the second option of those two. I feel if we are going to add it somewhere, infobox item is the most obvious place for it to be, but it doesn't need it's own row (as my example) I just did it that way as an easy example of how it could be done. In any case, I support adding it in some form to infobox item.  RS AdvLogMyles Prower  Talk 00:15, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Oppose/comment - Unnecessary on the infobox, I think it would make it a bit crowded. Others have mentioned that all augmentable items should have redirect at the top of the article - I believe it should also be mentioned in the opening section somewhere - if not then that's something we can go about adding.   SuperiosityQuick chat button.png: Come at me bro   02:54, 5 February 2019 (UTC)