Forum:Admins or Sysops

From the RuneScape Wiki, the wiki for all things RuneScape
Jump to: navigation, search
Forums: Yew Grove > Admins or Sysops
Archive
This page or section is an archive.
Please do not edit the contents of this page.
This thread was archived on 10 May 2010 by Chicken7.

With all the recent discussions over AEAE and people saying sysops have more power, etc, someone (I forgot who, I'll link if I can find, but basically-it's not my idea) suggested replacing the name admins with sysops. This would be quite an undertaking, but it might help dispel these feelings. Maybe it's a waste of time, I don't know, but I thought it was a pretty good idea, and thus I'm suggesting it.

One other thing (It is refered to as sysop by the cofounder of wikia, so to me it makes sense to be consistent with that.)

I just wanted to say that becoming a sysop is *not a big deal*.

I think perhaps I'll go through semi-willy-nilly and make a bunch of people who have been around for awhile sysops. I want to dispel the aura of "authority" around the position. It's merely a technical matter that the powers given to sysops are not given out to everyone.

I don't like that there's the apparent feeling here that being granted sysop status is a really special thing.

— Jimbo Wales [src]

HaloTalk 01:23, May 10, 2010 (UTC)

Discussion

Support - As nominator. HaloTalk 01:23, May 10, 2010 (UTC)

What are you proposing? ⁓ Hello71 01:28, May 10, 2010 (UTC)

Formally changing "Admin" to "Sysop", within the wiki system and such... 01:33, May 10, 2010 (UTC)
And what would be changed? ⁓ Hello71 02:10, May 10, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - First of all, there is no "official name" for them..some people call them admins and some call them sysops. And second of all, the name change doesn't change a thing..people still know they have the same abilities, and you even referred to them as sysops when you said they have a lot of power. Andrew talk 02:20, May 10, 2010 (UTC)

The technical name is System Operator, which is shortened to sysop. From there, we use "Administrator", which is actually the "official name" per say. Therefor, I oppose this proposal. Ajraddatz Talk 02:51, May 10, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - For semi-experienced editors, they're synonyms for each other and the occasional slip-in of sysop is fine. But people new to the Wiki concept will have no clue in hell what a "sysop" is. It's not what they'll search for and they won't be sure that's who they need for help. Sysop requests? Just isn't self-documenting, is it? Endasil (Talk) @  02:48, May 10, 2010 (UTC)

You do bring up a very good point. It is helpful for new members. I was just trying to think of a way to get rid of people thinking sysops are better than other users/have more of a say in discussions...because a large number of people seem to be confused about that. HaloTalk 02:59, May 10, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose - Wouldn't make much of a difference. We could call them "CornDogeoneers" and they would still have the same power and be different from normal users. Full Slayer Helmet! Evil1888 Talk A's L Dragon Platebody! 02:55, May 10, 2010 (UTC)

That's not the point. The point is to try to remove this false aura that they seem to have as being better than normal users in any way. "Administrators" makes them sound like they have more power (rightfully so), but that leads to people believeing that their say is worth more and such, which is incorrect. HaloTalk 03:01, May 10, 2010 (UTC)

Request for Closure - RS:SNOW + nominator request. HaloTalk 03:04, May 10, 2010 (UTC)


Closed - Due to unanimous opposition and nominator withdrawal. No action will be taken. Chicken7 >talk 05:59, May 10, 2010 (UTC)